Apparently, I don’t read right-wing blogs and columns nearly enough, because if I did, I might have realized that some very high-profile conservative voices have been downplaying the significance of Hurricane Katrina’s devastation along the Gulf Coast.
We all heard early estimates about literally thousands of people who may have been killed by the storm. A couple of days after Katrina made land fall, New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin suggested as many as 10,000 people perished. Fortunately, those estimates proved incorrect
The New Republic’s Jason Zengerle noted today, however, that a surprising number of conservatives have concluded that the lower-than-expected number of deaths means that Katrina simply wasn’t as bad as we’ve been led to believe.
The erroneous 10,000 figure, in the eyes of some commentators, seems to be evidence that the media has exaggerated the extent of the Katrina disaster — and the importance of the Katrina story. Noting on Monday that the current death toll in New Orleans stood at 579, Cliff May crowed on National Review Online that the number was not only less than 10,000 but was also “much less than the more than 35,000 killed by a heat wave in Europe two summers ago. You recall the debate that set off about European heartlessness, racism, and discrimination? No, neither do I.”
Meanwhile, conservative columnist Victor Davis Hanson declared: “For all the media’s efforts to turn the natural disaster of New Orleans into a racist nightmare, a death knell for one or the other political parties or an indictment of American culture at large, it was none of that at all. What we did endure instead were slick but poorly educated journalists, worried not about truth but about preempting their rivals with an ever-more-hysterical story, all in a fuzzy context of political correctness about race, the environment and the war.”
I had no idea so many conservatives were making such a painfully ridiculous case. Zengerle ably sets them straight.
[T]he horror of Katrina was not just about the number of people who died in the storm. Rather, the horror was about the squalor and anarchy of the Superdome and the chaos at the convention center; the horror was about our poorest, most vulnerable citizens being all but abandoned in their hour of greatest need. Most of all, the horror was about the realization that this was actually happening in the United States.
I expected, perhaps naively, that any decent human being could see what was happening in New Orleans and appreciate the seriousness of the crisis. Apparently not. If thousands didn’t die, then, in the minds of some on the right, Katrina was “hyped.”
Are these same conservatives prepared to argue that early estimates of fatalities on 9/11, which fortunately proved to be too high, makes that tragedy any less significant?