Testing the limits of partisan loyalty

Tom DeLay has given up his leadership post, at least for the time being, as his caucus’ rules mandate for a lawmaker under indictment. DeLay hasn’t resigned from Congress and, as far as he’s concerned, he’s planning to resume his duties after his trial.

The impact on the House Republican caucus is entirely unpredictable at this point. Will there be pressure on DeLay to resign from Congress? What about a power struggle among ambitious replacements? If DeLay’s trial drags on past the midterm elections, how patient are Republicans prepared to be?

The strains will likely be considerable.

The indictment means DeLay will be required to resign his leadership post, sparking a potential race to succeed the Majority Leader that could threaten a fragile balance of power within the Republican conference. […]

The announcement today is a major blow to congressional Republicans at a time when their overall approval ratings continue to sag. It also puts the focus back on ethics after a month of media coverage dominated by hurricanes and the flooding in New Orleans.

Even if Hastert & Co. planned for this contingency, today’s indictment could have unpredictable implications.

For example, I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if a member or two suggested that DeLay leave Congress altogether and devote all of his time to his legal defense. For House Republicans, it’s probably the least embarrassing and least inconvenient option.

About five months ago, when there were so many scandals surrounding DeLay they were almost hard to keep up with, there was sporadic talk in some GOP circles that DeLay was no longer worth supporting. Rep. Chris Shays (R-Conn.) called DeLay an “embarrassment to me and to the Republican Party.” Not long after, Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-Colo.) said it is “probably not the worst idea” for DeLay to step down. About a month later, 10 retired House Republicans, led by former U.S. Rep. Pete McCloskey (R-N.C.), went to Texas to try and recruit a primary opponent for DeLay in his district.

In response, DeLay did what all Republicans tend to do when overcome with scandal — he put his head down and waited for the story to go away. It worked, intra-party strife died down, and DeLay re-solidified power.

Of course, that was before he was facing a criminal conspiracy charge. Here’s a scenario that might be on the minds of some nervous Republican congressional leaders — DeLay is an albatross around their necks and will be a symbol of all that is wrong in GOP Land in 2006. If DeLay resigns from Congress, Texas’ Republican governor can name his replacement, ensuring the seat stays in Republican hands. If DeLay beats the charge, he’s set up with a lucrative lobbying gig anyway. If he doesn’t, well, they’ll visit him in jail.

And don’t forget those who want his job. A Majority Leader opening doesn’t come around very often. Whip Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) has been publicly supportive of DeLay, but he’d likely shed no tears if he won a sought-after promotion. There are a half-dozen Republicans thinking the same thing.

DeLay may have files with dirt on all of his colleagues, which in turn might help him keep the support he needs. But don’t be surprised if the long knives come out.

DeLay’s leaving Congress could be a mixed blessing. Aside from the continuing embarrassment to the right-wingers if he stays, being in Congress does mean that his movements remain under scrutiny. In other words, it’s better to have DeLay where you can see him.

Even if DeLay were convicted for any of his many transgressions I wouldn’t expect him to stop being a GOP power broker. Somehow no matter what these folks do they continue to be idolized by the right-wingers. Look at what happened to Newt– that somehow anyone thinks he’s a viable presidential candidate is beyond belief. And he’s not the only one — think Vin Weber, et. al. DeLay’s future fund-raising potential, one way or the other, will remain very high.

  • Here’s hoping that he stays in until at least next year, so we can keep using him as a model of the modern GOP.

  • If Delay held himself to the party-loyalty standard he holds the rest of the members to, he would not seek re-election while there is plenty of time to find someone to run. I doubt he will for no other reason that for Delay personally, I always felt the he thought party loyalty was for other members of Congress while he was more interested in getting what he could for himself.

    Of course I want Delay and his problems to drag the GOP down for the midterms and long-term so I think he should just stay and stink up the GOP back-room.

    I do wonder what his constituents and the Texas GOP is saying right now.

  • I don’t buy the assumption that DeLay will do what’s good for the party. Tom DeLay sees the party, and government in general, as his personal enrichment and patronage portfolio. From his perspective, if he goes to jail and and Republican party rallies then he’s still in jail. Period. Full stop.

    I’m expecting, and also hoping, that DeLay ignores the greater good and soldiers on right up until his court date. The only way to stop him, in my view, is to cut him off from the sources of patronage and easy cash. Good luck.

  • Tom DeLay has given up his leadership post, at least for the time being, as his caucus’ rules mandate for a lawmaker under indictment.

    Et tu, ‘Bagger? The possessive of “caucus” is “caucus’s.” The trailing apostrophe is for plurals, not for any word ending in “s.”

  • Comments are closed.