Rove at risk

Needless to say, the next few days will be exceedingly interesting for Karl Rove, Patrick Fitzgerald, and the political world following the ongoing criminal investigation of the Bush White House. Rove is poised to make his fourth appearance before the grand jury, and while few outside the courthouse know exactly what this means, the one thing everyone can agree on is that Rove is in a very tough spot.

Stephen Gillers, a New York University law professor, said it was unusual for a witness to be called back to a grand jury four times and that the prosecutor’s legally required warning to Rove before this next appearance is “an ominous sign” for the presidential adviser.

“It suggests Fitzgerald has learned new information that is tightening the noose,” Gillers said.

Here’s a summary of what you need to know from the last 12 or so hours:

* Murray Waas has learned that Rove’s testimony will come this morning, not next week. Rove will be “pressed about issues as to why his accounts to the FBI and grand jury have changed, or evolved, over time.”

* Fitzgerald has asked the New York Times’ Judith Miller to meet him next Tuesday to further discuss her conversations with I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, the vice president’s chief of staff.

* In recent days, Rove has been less visible than usual at the White House, fueling speculation that he is distancing himself from Bush or has been sidelined. (A Bush aide says Rove is with his family on a long-planned trip.)

* A continuing area of interest centers on a possible violation of the federal Espionage Act. Under this broad statute, a government official or a private citizen who passed classified information to anyone else in or outside the government could potentially be charged with a felony, if they transferred the information to someone without a security clearance to receive it.

* MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell predicted “at least three high level Bush Administration personnel” will be indicted, and possibly one or more very high-level aides will be labeled unindicted co-conspirators.

Here’s an idea: The reason Bush won’t admit to speaking with any of his cronies about the Plame leak is that he doesn’t want to be implicated. By declaring “There’s an ongoing investigation, there’s a gag order” even when there isn’t a gag order, he’s absolving himself of any ‘knowledge’ of the facts of the case. Remember what a fiasco it was when our last president was called to testify? After all, Dubya knows the worst thing he can do is speak without a script….

  • So, Rove is “on a long planned trip.” This is the guy who is supposed to be overseeing the rebuilding of NOLA after Katrina and Rita. Or, perhaps, it’s his kidney stones. Or the kids are sick.

    Yeah, whatever.

    I have a feeling our well-fed press corps in DC just doesn’t have the stones to call him out still. But, in the words of Josh Marshall, they seem candidates for “testiculagenesis.” With a 37% percent popularity rating (and still dropping), indictments either in place or looming, SEC investigations, corruption throughout becoming displayed on TV and in the papers, I think that the worm will turn.

  • As this unfolds, I think back to the scene in ‘The Usual Suspects’ as the conspirators are brought downtown for a mock police lineup. Rent that flick and watch that particular scene.

  • Think I’ll pass on today’s local news from my part of Texas about Karl and Darby Rove for your morning reading pleasure:

    ***

    Washington, DC – Today, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) announced that Frances Lovett, a registered voter in Kerr County, Texas, sent a complaint this week to Kerr County District Attorney, E. Bruce Curry, urging an investigation into whether Karl Rove, Deputy Chief of Staff to President Bush, violated Texas state law by illegally registering as a voter in Kerr County, despite never residing there.

    CREW had filed a complaint regarding this matter with the Elections Division of the Texas Secretary of State’s office on September 6, 2005. On September 8th, however, the Ft. Worth Star-Telegram reported that the Texas Secretary of State’s office does not have jurisdiction over this matter and that it must be investigated by county officials. They also said that CREW does not have jurisdiction to file a complaint, only a Kerr County registered voter can file such a complaint.

    “I have lived in Kerr County for the past 15 years and have never even heard that Mr. Rove or his wife lived in the area,” Frances Lovett said today. “Reading about Mr. Rove’s illegal voter registration in the paper, and knowing that a complaint could not be filed unless a Kerr County resident took action, I resolved to take this next step and send a letter to District Attorney E. Bruce Curry.”

    According to a report in The Washington Post on September 7, 2005, Mr. Rove and his wife, Darby, registered to vote in Kerr County in 2003 after they sold their Austin, Texas home. County property records show that Mr. Rove and his wife have owned two tiny rental cottages in Kerr County since 1997, the largest of which is only 814 feet and is valued by the county at $25,000. In contrast, the Roves’ Washington, D.C. home is valued at over $1.1 million. Other local Kerr County residents have stated that they have never seen Mr. Rove in the area.

    Texas law requires that a “qualified voter” be a resident of Texas and the county in which the application for voter registration is made.

    “Mr. Rove needs to be held accountable for his actions,” Melanie Sloan, executive director of CREW said today. “Ms. Lovett is a brave woman and we applaud her for standing up for what’s right.”

    ***

    Actually, I’ve seen photos of Rove’s cottages and know where they are. They are in fact small but quite nicely decorated, comfy riverside weekend spots. Apparently the Roves spend virtually no time there, or haven’t since they left Austin for Washington. As the reports in various TX newspapers said, “The cottages in Texas were part of the River Oaks Lodge that Rove and his wife, Darby, once owned on the Guadalupe River near Ingram. They sold the lodge in 2003 but kept the two cottages, which the bed-and-breakfast rents to guests….”

  • Comments are closed.