When Republicans attack — each other

A former official in Bush’s West Wing believes conservative activists are making a mistake opposing Harriet Miers’ Supreme Court nomination. “They’re crazy to take [Bush] on this frontally,” the official said. “Not many people have done that with George Bush and lived to tell about it.”

Aside from the fact that, once again, the Bush gang sounds more like an organized crime family than an executive branch of government, these not-so-subtle threats haven’t made much of an impact with former Bush speechwriter David Frum and his allies.

Influential conservatives who oppose the nomination of Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court are raising money to escalate their campaign to persuade her to withdraw from consideration. […]

David Frum, the former White House speechwriter who helped coin the phrase “axis of evil,” is coordinating the anti-Miers fundraising effort.

The first phase of the campaign is estimated to cost between $50,000 and $100,000. Frum declined to comment on how or when the money might be spent, whether on newspaper, radio or Internet advertisements. He said underwriters had expressed an interest in putting up the money and he had planned to go back to them when he and other strategists decided the best way to spend it.

He is teaming up with other conservatives behind the scenes to generate opposition to Miers’s nomination, which his former colleagues at the White House are straining to sell to the conservative base.

At the same time, the right-wing Progress for America, which enjoys close Bush ties, is launching a competing campaign, with ads targeted specifically at conservative activists. The group has already bought $10,000 worth of ads on conservative websites, including the Washington Times, Weekly Standard, National Review, and about 20 to 30 conservative blogs.

This exercise, pitting far-right conservatives against far-right conservatives, could get ugly.

Pass the popcorn.

If the pattern holds, the White House will go after David Frum with a vengence. They just don’t tolerate this kind of dissension from someone who worked with them.

  • I find it disturbing that the religious right conservatives are still fanactically chasing their holy grail of overtuning Roe while all around them our country is suffering.

  • “Not many people have done that with George Bush and lived to tell about it.”

    What the…

    Who in the…

    How does anyone get away with saying this sort of thing??? The thought of it is incredible, and I’m speechless.

    Also, looking into after Miers’ nomination fails, as it ought to, how is this going to be good for the next nominee? The conservatives are raging not because she’s completely unqualified but because Bush nominated a neanderthal who isn’t neanderthal enough for them. “Oh my God, did you hear that? She believes in helping the poor! She’s a lib-uh-rul!” How is that good news for us, who will be happy just to get a qualified moderate who hasn’t already decided to overturn Roe? When her nomination gets shot down, who is Bush going to nominate next? A qualified justice, or someone with a sloped forehead?

  • Matthew Scully on one side, David Frum on the other, can anyone tell me why the fuck I’m supposed to care about what a speechwriter thinks about the Supreme Court nominee? Both these guys love the sound of their own voice.

    On BBC radio they’ve got Clinton’s speechwriters talking about what it means to work in a scandal plagued White House too. It seems like there’s a rise in credibility of the voice of the presidential speechwriter for some unexplained reason, mutating into some odd “in-the-know” pundit with good grammar and no apparent qualification on the subject. Or any subject for that matter.

  • It seems like there’s a rise in credibility of the voice of the presidential speechwriter for some unexplained reason, mutating into some odd “in-the-know” pundit with good grammar and no apparent qualification on the subject. Or any subject for that matter.

    Wait, wait, wait. You know who used to work in the Clinton speechwriting office? I did. Those speechwriters are some sharp folks with an interesting combination of skills — policy expertise coupled with a gift for prose. Their work has to cover political strategy, the president’s agenda, the presiden’t voice, and the articulation of sometimes-complex policies. For news outlets looking for qualified pundits, they could do a lot worse than calling on a White House speechwriter.

    I should add, however, that the above described Clinton’s speechwriters. Writing for Bush is a lot easier (no substance, weak prose, frequent attacks on opponents).

  • Heh heh…. Note to self: Do not insult speechwriters on a blog ran by a speechwriter…..

    Still, as much as I am taking much joy from seeing the great right-winged beast rip at its own flesh, I am worried who will be marched out of the cave once Harriet gets shot down. Will bush go farther right to apease his base (or what is left of it), or will he put a true moderate because he is pissed that someone stood against him and his cohorts.

  • Comments are closed.