‘If they’re spending that kind of money, they’re spending it to protect themselves from something’

The questions about Harriet Miers have been piling up, but nearly all have been about her lack of qualifications, her sycophantic tendencies, her lack of a record, and her unknown beliefs. Today, however, we learn of a slightly different question that might be even more difficult to answer.

The AP reported that Miers’ law firm collected huge windfalls in legal fees from Bush’s Texas gubernatorial campaigns, most of it for work done during his 1998 re-election bid. At first blush, this doesn’t appear to mean much. Miers represented Bush, Bush needed legal advice over the course of a campaign, and so Miers was compensated for her work, right?

Not exactly. When Bush first ran for governor in 1994, Miers’ firm collected $7,000 in legal fees from Bush. Four years later, that number went up. A lot.

Campaign records show Bush’s Texas gubernatorial campaigns paid Miers a total of $163,000 in legal fees, most of it for work done during the future president’s 1998 re-election bid. […]

The 1998 totals … are extremely large for campaign legal work in Texas, an expert said.

“I’m baffled,” said Randall B. Wood, a partner in the Austin firm of Ray, Wood and Bonilla, and former director of Common Cause of Texas. “I’ve never seen that kind of money spent on a campaign lawyer. It’s unprecedented.”

To put it in further perspective, Bush spent almost as much in legal fees in running for governor in 1998 as he did in running for president in 2004.

And no one knows why. That is, at least not yet.

In fact, let’s add some more perspective to this. Bush ran up unprecedented legal fees in the midst of a gubernatorial race in which he barely had to campaign at all.

Former Texas Land Commissioner Garry Mauro, a Democrat who was defeated handily by Bush in the 1998 campaign, said both the amount and the timing of the payments are curious. In late September, when Miers’ firm received the first of two $70,000 payments, Mauro said he trailed Bush in the polls by 35 points.

“If they’re spending that kind of money,” said Mauro, now an Austin attorney who estimates he spent less than $20,000 on legal fees during the campaign, “they’re spending it to protect themselves from something.” (emphasis added)

To its credit, the AP touches on the question that had to be asked.

Dana Perrino, a White House spokeswoman, said the legal fees to Miers’ firm were for routine campaign work, but declined to be more specific. Presidential aides declined to say whether Miers ever worked on researching Bush’s past, such as his military record.

What do you know, Miers’ nomination can get worse. I stand corrected.

Now we’re touching on something real. Suspended licenses, no public record, mushy love notes – those are nothing. This is real. She could be sitting on a bombshell and this kind of appointment practically guarantees cooperation and silence till death do they part.

  • You know, I learned something new about corruption today. Of course it’s entirely possible (even likely) that Miers was researching Bush’s past. Maybe even in anticipation of his presidential bid.

    But then again, maybe this is just routine corruption and an example of using some loose change in a campaign warchest simply to reward sychophants. After all, as Mauro pointed out, he was so far behind & what else was Bush going to do with the money just lying around? Give it to the poor?

  • Stories like this make me really, really hopeful that this nomination isn’t withdrawn & makes its way to the Senate for hearings…hopefully someone on the JC has the huevos to ask about this stuff.

  • I doubt very seriously that there is more to this than dumping cash on a loyal family retainer.

    It would be cool if it was more, and Bush got busted over it, but I also think it would be cool if I won the lottery.

  • Biff – you may be right but if I had given money to Bush for the campaign – I would be a bit irked if he turned around and gave it to a loyal family retainer just because they are a loyal family retainer. Of course we are talking about Bush supporters.

  • Definitely something fishy going on there.

    The law firm should have been giving them a DEAL on their work, since Junior was the shoe-in Republican candidate, and if elected would be in a position to repay any favors, big time.

    Someone needs to find all the people who worked at that law firm back then, and see what they have to say about the work they did.

  • I read somewhere last week that Miers helped Bush hide or destory his record(s) of having been AWOL (?) during his stint in the National Guard.

    Could those HUGE payments been payoffs for destruction/hiding/shredding of the true records?

  • One’s lawyer might be a good intermediary for paying off people who might have damaging things to tell the press.

  • Comments are closed.