Just two weeks ago, reemphasizing his support for Harriet Miers, James Dobson made a point of explaining that his endorsement of Harriet Miers for the Supreme Court was not being offered casually.
“If I have made a mistake here,” Dobson said, “I will never forget the blood of those babies that will die that will be on my hands to some degree. That’s why I don’t take this lightly.”
He acknowledged the Miers nomination had “angered and disillusioned many Christian conservatives, many of my friends, many whom I love and have worked with for years.”
But asking if it makes any sense that President George W. Bush would sabotage the base of conservatives who worked and gave and supported him, Dobson answered his own question with a resounding — “I don’t believe it!”
Two weeks later, Dobson wants everyone to know he never really meant all of that unambiguous support he offered.
“I believe the president has made a wise decision in accepting Harriet Miers’ withdrawal as a nominee to the Supreme Court.
“In recent days I have grown increasingly concerned about her conservative credentials, and I was dismayed to learn this week about her speech in 1993, in which she sounded pro-abortion themes, and expressed so much praise for left-wing feminist leaders.
“When the president announced this nominee, I expressed my tentative support, based on what I was able to discover about her. But I also said I would await the hearings to learn more about her judicial philosophy. Based on what we now know about Miss Miers, it appears that we would not have been able to support her candidacy. Thankfully, that difficult evaluation is no longer necessary.”
Even by Dobson standards, this kind of amateur hackery is embarrassing. He expressed “tentative support”? Wrong, he offered unequivocal praise. He “would not have been able to support her candidacy”? Wrong; he had already endorsed her.
This is just sad.