Shelby gets away with controversial leak

When it comes to classified leaks, most of the attention has focused lately on the Plame scandal and the CIA’s “black sites” prisons. But let’s not forget that a sitting U.S. senator has been under investigation for about two years for his role a controversial leak of his own.

Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.), who was investigated by the Justice Department and the Senate Ethics Committee, was identified as the source of a leak to reporters about sensitive 9/11 intelligence. Though the reasons are a little murky, Shelby was quietly let off the hook last week.

The chairman and vice chairman of the [ethics] committee wrote to Shelby on Friday, saying the Justice Department had referred the matter to the panel in a letter dated July 20, 2004.

The FBI began searching for the source of the leak after news reports that the NSA had intercepted two messages on Sept. 10, 2001, that hinted at an impending action, but did not translate them until Sept. 12.

The story surrounding Shelby’s controversy has always looked damaging. In August 2004, Fox News’ Carl Cameron confirmed to FBI investigators that Shelby verbally divulged classified intercepted messages to him during a June 2002 interview, literally minutes after Shelby’s committee had been given the information in a classified briefing.

Shelby was chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee for over five years. He, of all people, knew all about legal restrictions on passing classified information over to the media, leaving him no excuse for this kind of recklessness. (Better yet, it didn’t even meet Fox’s standards — Cameron did not air the information Shelby gave him.)

Shelby said in a statement last week that he feels that he’s been “vindicated.” That’s a bit of a stretch. National Journal reported that the Ethics Committee had “insufficient evidence” to continue the probe, which is hardly a wholesale exoneration.

Ultimately, however, it looks like another Republican who can’t handle classified materials — and who’ll get away with it.

Speech recognition software on the fritz again? “black cites” should read “black sites.”

  • It’s important to point out why there isn’t enough information to make a case.

    Witnesses leery of testifying while Roberts stays on leak investigation

    Two witnesses interviewed by the FBI in its probe of classified information leaked from a joint congressional inquiry in 2002 say they are very concerned about cooperating with a Senate Ethics Committee review of the matter because Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan.) has not recused himself from the review.

    Roberts is a member of the Senate Select Committee on Ethics and chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. Good-government advocates have called on Roberts to recuse himself from the committee’s probe into the leak case, which the Justice Department referred to it last summer.

    The witnesses are reluctant to cooperate with the ethics panel because, they said, the FBI’s investigation focused on Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.), who at the time was the top Republican on the Intelligence Committee, and because Shelby’s former staff director Bill Duhnke and deputy staff director Jim Hensler now serve as Roberts’s top aides on Intelligence.

    Recusing is for Democrats. What is the point of gaining power if you can’t take it easy on your buddies.

  • Comments are closed.