Bush suffers his worst indignity yet

Usually there’s something in a national poll the president can find encouraging, but not the latest Gallup numbers. There are plenty of interesting results, but here’s the one Mr. “Restoring Honor and Decency” will find the most disturbing.

A 53% majority say they trust what Bush says less than they trusted previous presidents while they were in office. In a specific comparison with President Clinton, those surveyed by 48%-36% say they trust Bush less.

Bush not only loses to Clinton on the trust issue, he loses by a lot. I think I can hear Karl Rove whimpering from here.

Of course, this wasn’t the only compelling news in the poll. Here’s a sampling of some of the highlights:

* Approval rating — Bush’s job approval rating sank to a record low 37%. Among second-term presidents, only Nixon during Watergate had less support.

* On the issues — For the first time, a plurality disapprove of the way Bush is handling the issue of terrorism. Six in 10 disapprove of the way he’s handling foreign affairs, the economy, Iraq, and immigration.

* The war in Iraq — A record high 60% say going to war in Iraq was “not worth it.” In a finding consistent with previous polls, 54% say it was “a mistake” to send troops there.

* Bush and 2006 — Fewer than one in 10 adults say they would prefer a congressional candidate who is a Republican and who agrees with Bush on most major issues.

This has to be as low as Bush’s support can drop, right?

I figure Bush’s Veterans’ Day speech was designed not so much to convince anyone that the-whole-freaking-world-was-on-his-side when-we-invaded-Iraq-and-now-they’re-wimping-out-on-him — as pathetic an appeal as I’ve yet seen from him — as to try with forceful and confrontational language to win back his “base,” without whom he is helpless. This may work, but it should cost him further support from everyone else who had not yet been pushed over the line into 60% disapproval territory. So Bush’s support could drop even further.

  • It is stories like the FDA and Plan B, from another post, which makes Bush’s claims that he did not mislead us into war implausible. Everywhere you look in this administration decisions are made on fixed ideological notions. Kevin at Political Animal has a post today about what the Social Security debate can teach us about the Iraq war debate. Here you had an administration which misrepresented basic information. Fortunately, because it was a domestic issue everyone had access to the facts hence the misrepresentation could not be hidden. In fact, as I recall, Krugman used the Bush administrations misleading arguments and data on the economic as a template to judge his claims on Iraq. This is a very basic technique for judging a person’s credibility: have they lied to us before?

    On a personal level when a person repeatedly lies to you one eventually tires of trying to sort out truth from fiction. The solution is to cut-off contact with the liar. It appears that the electorate is finally headed in toward this solution.

  • Frankly, I have a mental picture of a limbo competition & the words ‘how low can he go’ running through my mind. 🙂

  • To be fair, I would bet that if the next president were to be in the kind of straits that our current head of state is in, people would answer that question the same way since people generally have a short memory for this kind of thing.

    Yet, I don’t mind seeing this at all.

  • How can 37% of the American people
    be this clueless?

    They’d vote for a hamster if it promised to let them keep their guns, make every knee bend at Jesus’ name, keep women, fags and liberals in their place, seal the borders, and make towelheads tremble in fear at the mention of the word “America”.

    For some folks “Yee-haw!” is not only a foreign policy, it’s the Law and the Prophets, the Decalogue, the Sermon on the Mount and the Constitution, all rolled into one.

    If Satre is right and hell is other people, parts of it are inevitably going to be warmer and more devil-infested than others.

  • Yes, but the remaining 36 % is getting stronger in their support, so it’s really just evening out!

    Like this crazy woman, imagine how much more she worships Bush now. Hell, it just started as a flag in her SUV after 9/11 and now she’s arguing the merits of attaching electrodes to the genitalia of captured “terrorists” with the woman at the gas station, riled up because she just dropped $62.95 on a tank of no-lead mid-grade. But that little foam ball on her antenna that says “I Love W” makes it OK for a little while.

    http://www.projo.com/blogs/shenews/photos/purpleheart.jpg

  • Comments are closed.