Woodward’s source

Of all the angles to the Bob Woodward story from the WaPo this morning, probably the most important is figuring out who, exactly, told Woodward about Plame. The article makes it pretty clear we’re looking at a third White House source — someone who is neither Libby nor Rove.

Raw Story reported today that the man behind Door #3 is National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley.

National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley was the senior administration official who told Washington Post Assistant Managing Editor Bob Woodward that Valerie Plame Wilson was a covert CIA officer, attorneys close to the investigation and intelligence officials tell RAW STORY.

Testifying under oath Monday to Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald, Woodward recounted a casual conversation he had with Hadley, these sources say. Hadley did not return a call seeking comment.

Woodward said he was told that it was “no big deal” that former Ambassador Joseph Wilson was sent to Niger to investigate the veracity of the Bush Administration’s claims that Iraq was seeking uranium from Niger. According to the attorneys, he said Hadley dismissed the trip by saying his wife, a covert CIA officer who worked on WMD issues, had recommended him.

At the time, Hadley was working under then National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice.

“We think that Mr. Woodward was going to write a story about it, but discussed it with some other people within the Bush Administration and was told that it wasn’t anything big,” one attorney told RAW STORY.

Keep in mind, Hadley was a key member of the now-infamous White House Iraq Group. Not incidentally, when the head of Italy’s military secret service knowingly gave forged documents about uranium in Niger to Bush administration officials, then-deputy national security advisor Hadley was the primary recipient.

Also note that as recently as a month ago, there were reports that Hadley expected to be indicted as part of the Plame investigation.

I guess reports of the Plame scandal’s death were greatly exaggerated. Stay tuned.

Although I do not think this helps Libby in any real sense, does this help Rove? Woodward appears to be saying that the administration, through hadley, was telling him that Joe Wilson’s trip and who sent him was no big deal as Wilson’s wife was in the CIA and this was therefore nothing really unusual–it kept Woodward from writing a story on it. Could this claim support Rove’s claim that his comments to Cooper were to keep Cooper from running with a similarly “unimportant” story about the reason why WIlson was sent and his wife’s connection thereto (I forget the exact language used by Rove/Cooper)? I don’t believe anything these bastards say, but it is possible that even if not true this new discovery is being pushed out there to protect Karl.

  • I am very cynical about this revalation that Woodward testified. I believe that this is a White House or Rove attempt to exonerate Libby by questioning Fitzgerald’s investigation. That is there are other reporters and other sources for the leak besides Libby.

  • Anybody out there read Woodward’s recent books on Bush and his Iraq mess?

    If so, what sort of familiarity exists between Woodward and Cheney? Is any sort of a friendship implied in the books?

  • Wouldn’t Hadley’s being a participant in the investigation for so long, tend to weigh against his having suddenly remembered that he talked to Woodward?

    Or make that look very suspicious?

  • I know some of you remember me because I still get emails. I guess
    maybe it is a cosmic coincidence that I am posting this today!

    I’m the guy with the delivery company–a couple of my guys parked
    near the Dupont Scientology place, and the Scientologists went
    crazy when they mentioned blinkers. The Scientologists have been
    hassling me ever since then.

    [edited for space and for not having anything to do with the topic – CB]

  • I’m surprised at how little has been made of the similarities between Woodward and Judy Miller. How many reporters are running interference for the administration? I’m pretty sad to learn that a reporter I once held in high esteem would use “protecting sources” as an excuse for shielding the White House character assassins.

    I guess he owes them a lot, after all the money he made on “Plan of Attack,” which (under the guise of investigative reporting) served as an apology for Bush. So much for the press acting as a watchdog.

  • My previous post to this thread implied that Cheney may be Woodward’s source. But only if a deep friendship could be shown to exist between the two.

    After a tour around the blogs tonight I realize four things:

    1) My (11/3) post flipping the urchins is dead on prescient.

    2) Cheney is going down. Count on it. The whole focus of this administration has now shifted to saving Bush from the ultimate act of accountability: impeachment. And even if they can save him from that he is going to suffer three years of indignant ridicule. He is going to be mocked so much, he will wish he was physically tortured instead.

    3) The harder this administration and its “scream-machine” try to hold back the truth, the more the truth insists on washing them away. Folks…. we are witnessing nothing less than a tusunami wrapped in a hurricane. Or if you will: God is drowning these sick rats in their own excretment.

    4) Condisleeza Vice will be the next VP. Gear up right now to drown that bitch in her own phelgm. Here is the killer Condi question: What the fuck were you doing shopping for $3000 shoes while New Orleans drowned? Have you no sense of decency? And what do you mean the report said: Osama Bin Laden determined to strike America? And you didn’t do nothing? NOTHING? WTF you worthless bitch?

    Go for the aorta folks.
    Go for the aorta.

    Show your teeth, not compassion.

  • Comments are closed.