A ‘fair and balanced’ take on Alito advertising

I can’t say I’m terribly surprised, because this is just so typical.

Fox News is refusing to air an ad critical of Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito, citing its lawyers’ contention that the spot is factually incorrect.

A spokesman for the groups sponsoring the ad said the network’s decision reflects the political right’s effort to shield President Bush’s choice for the high court.

The ad says that as an appellate court judge, Alito has “ruled to make it easier for corporations to discriminate … even voted to approve strip search of a 10-year-old girl.” Referring to a document Alito wrote in 1985 while seeking a job in the Reagan administration, it quotes him as saying that “the Constitution does not protect a right to an abortion.”

On the substantive point about the Alito ad, it’s a pretty hard-hitting spot, but it’s hardly “inaccurate.” There are matters of opinion and perspective, but FNC suggested the ad is patently false. It’s not. Alito does have a controversial record on discrimination; his ruling on the strip search continues to be a point of contention, and on his application to become deputy assistant to Attorney General, Alito really did state his opposition to a constitutional right to an abortion.

Put it this way — if Fox News was willing to run Bush-Cheney 2004 ads, this should have made it through the network’s fact-checking process pretty easily.

On a side note, is it me or has the last year been awful for progressive voices seeking paid air time on TV? In January, MoveOn.org raised enough money to buy an ad during the Super Bowl, but CBS rejected it, noting its “long-term policy not to air issue ads anywhere on the network.” Just a few weeks prior, CBS and NBC refused advertising from the United Church of Christ because the church’s open, tolerant message of inclusion was labeled “too controversial.” More recently, a Utah television station (owned by Clear Channel) refused to air an anti-war ad featuring Cindy Sheehan.

I guess gaining access to the “public’s airwaves” can be challenging sometimes.

I like Factcheck.org’s take on it. Maybe someone could send the link to the Fox network.

http://factcheck.org/article360.html

  • Perhaps this report from the Mirror explains why the networks are hesitent to air ads from voices crititical of the administration. According to the Mirror,

    PRESIDENT Bush planned to bomb Arab TV station al-Jazeera in friendly Qatar, a “Top Secret” No 10 memo reveals.

    But he was talked out of it at a White House summit by Tony Blair, who said it would provoke a worldwide backlash.
    […]
    The No 10 memo now raises fresh doubts over US claims that previous attacks against al-Jazeera staff were military errors.

    In 2001 the station’s Kabul office was knocked out by two “smart” bombs. In 2003, al-Jazeera reporter Tareq Ayyoub was killed in a US missile strike on the station’s Baghdad centre

    This really is president that hates decent.

  • Betcha a buck and a beer that Fox will have no trouble airing the ads against Sen. Harry Reid that the RNC plans to run.

    Just for fun, I looked up the word “hypocrite” in my dictionary, and the first definition was “any member of the Rethug Party, especially those elected by fraud and/or annointed by a court;” and the second definition was “Roger Ailes and anyone associated with Fox News, especially the on-air talking bimbos and lying pigs.” Who wudda thunk it?

  • The Right pushed media concentration, an end to the fairness doctrine and a relaxation of public service requirments. The corporate right-wing media is the corporate right-wing media. The only progressive voices are singing castrato, if they are singing at all.

    Progressives, liberals and Democrats had better wake up to reality: thorough-going media reform is a necessity.

  • Bullshit!

    Fox News has run every anti-Roberts ad, every anti-Bush ad and every Moveon.org rant it has been offered. Dollars are dollars.

    Nonetheless, Jim Jordan and his cronies so desparate for money and publicity that they know they can just put this out on the wire like chum in the the water to get the BDS left’s juices and $ flowing.

    Publicity stunt. Nothing more. Nothing less.

  • Comments are closed.