Corruption has not gone by unnoticed

There’s a widespread belief among congressional Republicans that their caucus’ legal and ethical scandals are of limited significance to voters. When they hold town hall forums, few ask about corruption, leading many to assume that this is a “inside the beltway” uproar that is yet to strike a chord with “real people.”

If the GOP is counting on this to be true, they may want to consider a Plan B.

Indictments, investigations and a congressman’s guilty plea for taking millions in bribes have left most Americans convinced that political corruption is a deeply rooted problem, according to an Associated Press-Ipsos poll. […]

Sixty-five percent of respondents disapproved of lawmakers’ work in Washington and only 31 percent approved, the worst numbers since AP-Ipsos began asking the question in January.

Several of those interviewed said corruption was endemic to a political system awash in colossal amounts of lobbying money and beset by an insatiable demand for campaign cash.

In all, 88% of Americans, according to this poll, said misconduct among politicians is a “serious problem.” The AP also reported that poll respondents “had no trouble reciting the names associated with offenses and inquiries,” in particular Tom DeLay. And though the margin is by no means large, Dems were considered more ethical than Republicans, 36% to 33%.

Looking ahead, congressional Dems have a clear, specific policy agenda that would fundamentally change how Congress operates and would give the Hill “a good scrubbing.” If voters are as concerned about corruption as they appear to be, it’s an agenda that might find a receptive audience.

What I find interesting is that those that believe corruption was endemic and disapprove of lawmakers work are just as likely as the others to say “not my congressman.”

  • From a Melanie Sloan essay at TPM:

    “Congress has a constitutional obligation to police itself, but members are full of excuses as to why they can’t or won’t file ethics complaints. The truth is that the Democratic leadership doesn’t allow anyone to file a complaint for fear of retaliation, not exactly a profile in courage. Congressional inaction on ethics has forced the Department of Justice to criminally investigate conduct once left to the jurisdiction of the ethics committees. It is abundantly clear that the House leadership – both Democratic and Republican – will take ethics seriously only when we, as citizens and voters, force them to.”

    http://www.tpmcafe.com/story/2005/12/8/171912/291

    A stronger agenda on ethical behavior in congress is commendable without a doubt. But talk is cheap. A significant portion of citizens seem to be aware of their poor performance and are upset about it. Is congress listening or just running their yaps? How does the public get to speak as loud as corporate cash and gifts? The public is not a member of this insiders club called congress.

  • ” And though the margin is by no means large, Dems were considered more ethical than Republicans, 36% to 33%.”

    I think that’s the key point – they’re all bums, Dems and Reps
    alike, in the public’s mind. A three percent difference is
    insignificant. And I also think the recent round of scandals
    is simply confirming what the public has always believed –
    that they can’t trust Congress or government. I don’t believe
    any new ground is being broken. Not to say it won’t, if it
    really opens up, but so far I think the Republican view is
    the correct one. Nothing to worry about – yet.

    And will “yet” happen? I just don’t think anything is going to
    touch the Bush administration or the Republican Congress.
    It should have, and hasn’t. So what’s it going to take?
    Clinton would have been impeached and convicted a
    dozen times already. But not these guys.

  • The sad thing is that arguably, the GOP has unfairly damaged the Democrat’s reputation by association through their own sheer corruption as well as their intransigence. (I don’t think the Democrats are anywhere near as crooked as the GOP. Dems aren’t in government to tear it apart, they are there to make it work better for people. Generally.) The voters expect the parties to cooperate and work together, but the GOP has no intention of reaching out to the minority party, only forcing through their own agenda by hook or by crook (literally, sadly.)

    How can the Democrats seperate themselves from the GOP, and send a clear message to voters that they aren’t corrupt like the GOP? Having a clear, specific policy agenda is great until it tanks because you’re the minority party and the majority has no interest in cleaning up their own corruption.

  • How can the Democrats separate themselves from the GOP, and send a clear message to voters that they aren’t corrupt like the GOP?- Rian M.

    I heard Rahm Emmanuel, (sp?), today on Air America talking with Al Franken and he was like a terrier shaking the culture of corruption concept. It sounded great.

    I also heard a cut of British Parliament during a recent question and answer period and it gave me the idea that the Dem’s should sound like that. Certainly there won’t be a formal opportunity for interrogating ShrubCo until hell freezes over but the public forum could be used much more effectively with an intelligent, focused and coordinated “noise machine” of our own. And the noise machine doesn’t have to be a chaotic racket. I think it’s perfectly feasible to cause some pointed ruckus regardless of our minority position. But that scenario then circles around to the Dem’s as a whole not providing anything resembling “profiles in courage” or seemingly any desire to speak with one voice so “Nightmare on Pennsylvania Avenue continues.

    And I’d like to think that RepubCo primarily are the real crooks but are the Dem’s looking cleaner at the moment because of superior innate morality or less opportunity in our current RepubCo controlled K Street world?

    Look at how freaked out ShrubCo got when Clinton spoke today in Montreal. If that’s all it takes to get their panties in a knot than we need to keep twisting. They’ve got this passive/aggressive thing going on where they are either the badasses telling the world how it’s going to be or the wounded, sensitive compassionate conservatives just carrying their crosses for the good of mankind. It’s such transparent crap but they keep getting mileage out of it.

    It doesn’t seem like it has to be this way.

  • Comments are closed.