Bush is annoying the wrong age demographic

A new NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll was released late yesterday, showing Bush’s approval rating soaring all the way to 39%, from 38%. (An MSNBC headline, which is no longer online, described this as Bush getting “a boost” in popularity. I’d call it a “rounding error,” but I’m not a national cable network.)

But even more important than just the latest job-approval numbers is the breakdown among age demographics. The WSJ’s John Harwood has an interesting take on the poll results today, paying particular attention to the fact that elderly voters are ones Bush is loosing the fastest.

In a period of broad-ranging public discontent, that among senior citizens stands out as most worrisome for Republicans aiming to keep control of the House and Senate in the fall.

“They’re a pretty cranked up bunch and they’ve got to be handled with enormous care by incumbents,” says Republican pollster Bill McInturff, who helps conduct the Journal/NBC survey. So far, adds his Democratic counterpart Peter Hart, “the Bush administration has done more to alienate them than to gain their support.”

The results can be seen in Americans’ attitudes toward Congress 11 months before Election Day 2006. By a 65%-19% margin, Americans age 65 and above disapprove of the performance of Congress; those under 65 are also negative but less lopsidedly, 58%-27%. Moreover, senior citizens say by 47%-37% that they want Democrats rather than Republicans to win control of Capitol Hill. Those under 65 prefer a Democratic victory by a narrower 45%-39% margin.

Interesting. According to the 2004 exit polls, Bush beat Kerry by most age groups, but did the very best among those 60 and over. Now, those same voters disapprove of Bush by wider margins than any other age group.

This is more than just poli-sci trivia. As Harwood noted, voter turnout among senior citizens is traditionally higher than anyone else — particularly in the midterm cycle.

Bush, in other words, couldn’t have picked a worse age group to annoy.

Bush isn’t running again, and by the time the next election rolls around they’ll have some other fake controversy ginned up.

Like the business class from which it comes (and which it primarily serves), this administration thinks more about the next quarter than the next year or the next decade. Apres nous le deluge.

  • Bush has fallen and he can’t get up.

    He refuses to meet with the real (i.e. unscreened) seniors at their once a decade meetings in DC, as CB noted previously.

    And most seniors I know do tend to remember such abysmal performances and, more than other groups, are willing to vote for the other party–stubbornness? Maybe. But this is definitely a positive sign for 2006.

  • So what the hell are the old geezers complaining about? They knew what they were getting when they voted for him, so now they can live with him just like the rest of us.

    At least they won’t have to live with the consequences of Bush’s presidency for as long as I probably will. That’s one silver lining Bush could offer them.

  • Medicare Part D is going to be a ratfuck of epic proportions, and it all begins in exactly 17 days. Actually, the PR rollout has already begun, but the enrollment period itself begins January 1, and ends, if I’m not mistaken, June 30. There are penalties for not signing up during the enrollment period. The program itself is incredibly complex, doesn’t really do much for seniors, and is already reviled. Which is why Junior wouldn’t make an appearance at the once-every-ten-years senior conference happening in DC this week.

    If Karl Rove is such a genius, why is this program coming into effect during the runup to midterm elections? This thing is guaranteed to lose votes for anyone who voted for it.

  • Even though seniors were not to be affected by Bush’s three-card-monte game with Social Security, they got the most fired up about it, because they know all the good Social Security can do.

    Is there any way we can persuade Junior to start his Social Security hucksterism again?

  • Just when those seniors are all trying to figure out how to sign up for their new Medicare “benefit” and keep their grandchildren out of Iraq.

    And I’ll bet they could give a rat’s ass whether you say Happy Holidays or what.

  • The third rail of politics is back: Social Security.

    Medicare Part D is going to be a ratfuck of epic proportions

    bling is so right. Part D is being executed as a bonanza for the insurance and drug companies. Seniors are being bombarded from every angle and are thoroughly confused. Seniors are getting angrier every day with the confusion.

    And who gave America’s seniors Part D by holding open a 15-minute vote in the House for nearly three hours? The Republican Party. Does America’s senior need to be reminded early and often? Yes, indeed!

  • Is it possible that those of us who are older have seen more “styles” of governing for comparison purposes? And maybe even a somewhat more complete education in how our government is supposed to work?

    Those factors and better reporting of late may be what’s turning elders against Bush.

  • Comments are closed.