Snarlin’ Arlen isn’t lying about spying

Following up on an earlier item about the Bush White House quietly allowing the National Security Agency to spy on Americans, on U.S. soil, without getting a warrant, at least one Republican senator is bothered enough to consider hearings on the issue.

A key Republican committee chairman put the Bush administration on notice Friday that his panel would hold hearings into a report that the National Security Agency eavesdropped without warrants on people inside the United States.

Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., said he would make oversight hearings by his panel next year “a very, very high priority.”

“There is no doubt that this is inappropriate,” said Specter, a Pennsylvania Republican and chairman of the Judiciary Committee.

If the Senate Judiciary Committee follows through on this, it would likely be the first major hearing of a Bush-related scandal since, well, ever.

Not surprisingly, administration figures are on the defensive. Condoleezza Rice, on NBC’s “Today” show, said she wouldn’t comment on “intelligence matters,” but added that she believes the president “has not ordered people to do things that are illegal.”

The Center for National Security Studies disagrees, telling the WaPo that the secret order may amount to the president authorizing criminal activity.

Sounds like the kind of question that can be explored in a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing.

Arlen will recant in 3…2…1…

  • So Condi doesn’t think the Pres ordered people to anything illegal.

    Which is because she believes the President makes things legal by ordering them.

    As far as the Bushies are concerned, if it’s got to do with the war on terrorism, Bush is not restricted by any laws written by a mere Congress.

  • So are these hearing going to be held before or after Specter deals with the Terrell Owens suspension?

  • A big part of this is, or should be, why the
    New York Times withheld publication of the story
    for a year. And it leads to a broader question:
    exactly how much information that the public
    ought to know is being withheld willfully by
    the press and media, ostensibly for “national
    security” reasons?

    I’m also curious as to how long that “year”
    actually is. Might it even extend back to
    November of 2004? Or even before the
    election? Even if the answer is no, there’s
    something really insidious going on –
    maybe. Will Arlen’s hearings probe this
    aspect? If they occur at all, which I doubt.

  • Another lovely piece of legal atrocity authored by the ever-fun John C. Yoo. It must be nice to be completely devoid of conscience…

  • Comments are closed.