Moving America backwards

Some of Bush’s more blindly loyal supporters are taking to the airwaves to bolster support for the war in Iraq. You’ll never guess what they’re saying.

The television commercials are attention-grabbing: Newly found Iraqi documents show that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction, including anthrax and mustard gas, and had “extensive ties” to al Qaeda. The discoveries are being covered up by those “willing to undermine support for the war on terrorism to selfishly advance their shameless political ambitions.”

The hard-hitting spots are part of a recent public-relations barrage aimed at reversing a decline in public support for President Bush’s handling of Iraq. But these advertisements aren’t paid for by the Republican National Committee or other established White House allies. Instead, they are sponsored by Move America Forward, a media-savvy outside advocacy group that has become one of the loudest — and most controversial — voices in the Iraq debate.

In one sense, I can understand the appeal of insisting — facts be damned — that Bush was right all along. After all, in 2002 and 2003, when arguments about WMD and ties to al Qaeda dominated, the war enjoyed considerable political support. It’s only when the discussion shifted towards reality that Americans started to believe that the war was a mistake. In this sense, it was only a matter of time before some brilliant conservative strategist said, “I know! Those old arguments worked before, so let’s use them again!”

Just as importantly, Move America Forward, which claims to have no formal connections to the White House or the RNC, has raised more than $1 million for its efforts — and they’ve been awfully busy. The recall effort against Gray Davis? These guys. Ads supporting John Bolton’s United Nations nomination? Ditto. Backing abuse at Guantanamo Bay? Them again. Five far-right radio-show hosts broadcasting from Iraq for a week? Same group.

And now Move America Forward, which somehow manages to be a tax-exempt non-profit organization, is hitting the airwaves with bizarre ads about non-existent weapons stockpiles. I have to admit, the group has the shtick down pat — spend a little money on modest ad buys with a ridiculous message, then wait for news outlets to start repeating the ad as part of their political coverage.

It’s an effective page from the far-right playbook. Just ask the Swiftboat guys.

Gotta love the power of denial.

  • Is there not some FCC rule about truth in advertizing?
    Could some reality-based group sue these ass-wipes for churning out lies?

  • Even if this group produced a picture of Saddam Hussein and Ossama Bin Laden posing together in front of of a 55 gallon drum of mustard gas, I don’t think people are going to buy it. The war in Iraq was a terrible mistake, and I think many people supported it primarily because they were blinded by their outrage over 9/11. What Bush and company did by tying Al Qaeda to Iraq, knowing that it was untrue, was a disgrace. Time has given people an opportunity to consider the Iraq question more closely, especially in view of the actual threat that they posed to our national security, and the cost in lives and money that it has consumed, and I think it will cement Bush’s legacy as one of our worst Presidents. And this is coming from a moderate to conservative republican.

  • You’re right, Dave. Only the most willfully self-deluded will accept unsupported statements anymore. These days most people will likely ask difficult questions like, “Ok, where are these papers? Who found them, where were they found and when? Show them to us, we want to see them.”

    These ads are just one more sad example of the one-trick pony that is Karl Rove and his offspring. If anyone believes them it will be pure gravy for the forces of darkness, but I hope people by now will be so weary of the same old slime that they won’t even pay attention.

  • “Only the most willfully self-deluded will accept unsupported statements anymore.”

    Very true. But the problem is that this is a large and growing demographic in the good ol’ USA. Thanks, primarily, but not entirely, to folks like Robertson, Dobson and co.

  • It will also be interesting to see which media outlets will transmit this crud. Will those which have refused to air progressive group ads turn these down as well? Something to be noted.

  • The above commentors give the American people–or the “average American”–far too much credit in this age of “Intelligent Design.” These ads are obviously aim at the wavering elements of the Republican base–and “the great unwashed masses.” The conservative method of selling lies is: Repeat, repeat, repeat, and repeat again. Too many people just want to believe in Bush–facts don’t matter.

  • It will also be interesting to see which media outlets will transmit this crud. Will those which have refused to air progressive group ads turn these down as well?

    Is there any recourse if the media outlets that refused progressive group ads are the ones playing these? Can we petition the FCC or something?

  • Too many people don’t trust the Administration — just look at the poll responses. I don’t think they’ll trust this stuff either. It will give some professional wingnut shouters something to get them through the January doldrums, but the piling up and piling up of evidence of lies will smother them eventually.

  • These guys aren’t to “Swift” and seemed to have missed the boat. Their timng is terrible. The talk around my Christmas table was about the President, and what suprised me was the lack of any support for him.

    Agree with those above and we should be tracking which media outlets play these ads.

  • I hate to lower ourselves to their level, but shouldn’t some people not affiliated with the DNC make some slimy attack ads? It’s not hard to see how easy it would be to make the commercials.

    Right now I wouldn’t even care if they are personal character assassinations of Move America Forward, Bush family corporate partners, or corruption-related murders in Africa when Cheney was head of Halliburton. But maybe I’m just angry and will want the high road when this passes.

  • Comments are closed.