Meet John Boehner

With Tom DeLay’s reign as House Majority Leader officially over, the race to replace him is on. If House Speaker Dennis Hastert steers clear of the leadership shake-up, which is by no means a certainty, the fight to fill DeLay’s shoes will likely boil down to two Republicans: Reps. Boy Blunt of Missouri and John Boehner of Ohio (pronounced BAY-ner).

For most political observers, Blunt is the more recognizable name and face. He was tapped to be acting Majority Leader after DeLay was hit with the first of three criminal indictments (and counting), and served as the House Majority Whip for a few years. Jesse Lee noted over the weekend, “If Tom DeLay is the chief architect of the culture of corruption, Blunt has been the foreman on the construction site.” It’s a fair description; Blunt has been up to his ears in ethically-dubious schemes, a DeLay-like K-Street fundraising machine, and dubious deals for years.

John Boehner, however, may not be as well known. Long-time political junkies may recall that Boehner was in the House leadership in the mid-1990s, but was ousted in 1998, in a move driven in part by Tom DeLay, after Republicans unexpectedly lost seats in Clinton’s last mid-term cycle. He’s worked his way back up, however, and is making a play for the post formerly known as DeLay’s job.

In light of Blunt’s well-deserved reputation for playing fast and loose with congressional ethics, Boehner has picked up some support as a more “moderate” alternative. But before anyone thinks of this guy as a reasonable voice for change, consider Boehner’s record — he enjoys a 100% rating from the American Conservative Union, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and the Christian Coalition. Boehner was one of only a handful of House Republicans to vote with George W. Bush’s position literally 100% of the time last year.

As Sam Rosenfeld noted, “reform” is the last thing on Boehner’s mind.

As Republican Conference chair from 1995 to 1998, Boehner himself initiated the formalized, semi-official marriage of lobbyists and GOP lawmakers now commonly associated with DeLay: in the words of David Maraniss and Michael Weisskopf in their history of the Gingrich years, Boehner served as the leadership’s “liaison to business,” conceiving of and hosting the Thursday Group, a “weekly strategy session with business and trade association leaders.” In 2004 Jeff Birnbaum described Boehner’s Thursday Group as “the granddaddy of all [the] mutual-back-scratching sessions” between lawmakers and lobbyists that now occur on a daily, regularly scheduled basis.

And then, of course, there’s Boehner’s Abramoff ties.

Another possible candidate for majority leader, Rep. John Boehner of Ohio, also had financial links to Abramoff.

According to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics, he received $32,500 in campaign contributions from Abramoff and the lobbyist’s clients — more than DeLay did.

And in the mid-1990s, Boehner was criticized by public interest groups for passing out campaign contributions from tobacco companies to lawmakers on the House floor.

In other words, Tom DeLay will soon be replaced by a far-right conservative who toes the party line and has a history of questionable conduct that dances along the ethical line — no matter who House Republicans pick.

Works for me.

A jerk named “Boner”, who took more Abramoff money than Tom Delay.

Excellent!

  • I consider it a procedural position, so I don’t think anyone can reasonably expect the GOP to put someone in it who doesn’t toe the party line, and I don’t think we can particularly complain because they don’t put in some RINO moderate. However, what they ought to be concerned about is finding someone who isn’t likely to engage in corrupt hijinks like holding midnight votes, keeping 5-minute votes open for hours. I guess I hold the conceit that someone can be a conservative representative but an honest, hard-working one who abhors excess, or that someone like that exists in the House. Silly me.

  • I could not care less who wins but I do hope that they decide just in time for the winner to be implicated by Abranoff and or The Duke. How fun would it be to have every rep in Congress rally around the new boss (same as the old boss) and then watch that guy end up exactly where DeLay is. Is it too late to ask for a Christmas gift from Santa!?

  • I hope they vote in Blunt or someone else closely tied to all of the past. That will provide solid election fodder.

  • I don’t know about election fodder. Delay and all his corruption issues didn’t seem to resonate with voters in 2004. I would think it would take forever for them to notice if the next guy turns out rotten too. It seems to take the electorate forever to even realize who is in the position.

  • I agree with Rian. Unless the congressperson appointed to the position is from a voter’s home state, they could care less.

  • Well, living in Boehner’s home district, and having interacted with his office on several occasions, I can vouch that he is slime. I get his weekly e-mails, just to see what kind of nonsense he’s peddling for my neighbors – typical tripe. Last week it was defending Bush’s NSA shenanigans. This guy is slick, and devious plain and simple.

    His office never responds to any of my requests (mainly because I ask them to send me proof of the assertions he makes in his weekly e-mails . . . verbotten!).

    He’s dashing and handsome, tho – and can tell lies just like the rest of ’em, so I’m sure Mr. & Mrs. Q Public, if they bother to pay any attention at all, will think he’s just swell.

    sigh.

  • I’m a tiny bit surprised that Delay clones like Blunt and Boehner are such prominant early contenders. The frustration amongst rank and file RepubCo with Delay seems to be more related to the power vacuum created by his absence than with any shame attached to his behavior despite some protestations of dismay about his pus covered aura. In the great tradition of righties being unmasked as more “deviant” than their conservative proclamations would indicate, maybe they like being dominated. Maybe they hold out for a public arm twisting after three hours of foreplay during a vote because they like the pain and humiliation. Maybe this is why the right is so cool with torture. It’s not about information. The torture is an end in itself. The whole right side of the show is far freakier than they let on. They’re all wearing some kind of groin constrictor which brings them a perverse grinding pleasure and our country a great deal of pain.

    Sorry, that’s an odd digression but I see RepubCo as the biggest pack of charlatans ever. What amazes me is how so many have gotten on the same page at the same time. I guess that’s where the usefulness of a “Hammer” comes in. Should be interesting to see who they choose to wield the paddle next. Maybe Roy and John can set up a spanking line so the undecided voters can determine who dishes out the best punishment. But it’ll never be like it was with Tommy.

  • Comments are closed.