I can appreciate that Samuel Alito’s allies are having trouble justifying Alito’s membership in the Concerned Alumni of Princeton, and the fact that he touted said membership in 1985 to help highlight his conservative bona fides. I can also appreciate the fact that Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) has a tendency to be, shall we say, a little foolish.
But this defense of Alito and the CAP is the nuttiest notion of the entire confirmation process.
Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) sought to defend Alito on the Concerned Alumni of Princeton (CAP) issue, noting that Coburn was a member of the American Medical Association and certainly did not agree with everything it did and said. Thus, he said, it was unfair to associate Alito with various comments, some of them said to be racist, made in a CAP publication.
Look, we’re talking about a group formed for the express purpose of opposing the admission of women to Princeton. CAP then branched out in order to criticize Princeton’s minority admissions, “permissive social norms,” and nondenominational religious services.
This is similar to the American Medical Association … in no way in particular. Is Coburn’s point that the CAP may have had a few less-crazy positions on issues? Maybe so; I don’t know of any, but it’s possible. But anyone who’d join the group — then brag about it — has to bear some responsibility for endorsing the organization’s agenda. Saying “I only agreed with their sane ideas” doesn’t work. Neither does, “I don’t remember anything.”
And comparing Concerned Alumni of Princeton to the AMA is just bizarre, even by Coburn standards.