Clinton didn’t go for warrantless searches

For the past couple of weeks, too many Bush supporters have defended the president’s warrantless-search program by replying, “Clinton did it too.” The claim is wrong, but it’s been surprisingly common.

Today, the Big Dog himself addressed the approach his administration took.

When asked if the president should have constitutional authority to order domestic surveillance without a warrant during wartime — a controversy President Bush currently faces — Clinton said it is “a decision the Supreme Court would have to resolve.”

“My attitude was that once the Congress had spoken on it and given us the tools that we needed, we used it,” he said. “We used the law. We either went there and asked for the approval or, if there was an emergency and we had to do it beforehand, then we filed within three days afterward and gave them a chance to second guess it, because I thought it was a good — I think in the country you always have to try to balance these things out, so that’s what we did.”

Do you suppose this might stop Bush supporters from repeating the talking point? Never mind; don’t answer that.

Let’s just call it ‘shampoo politics’ from now on; you know: lather, rinse, repeat. 😉

  • In light of the big dick Cheny’s recent comments about Iraq/Al Quida (sic) ties, all I have to say is:

    Hey Republicans, go Cheny yourselves you bunch of Chenying liars!

  • The great irony is that right wingers spent eight
    years blasting Clinton as the anti-Christ,
    berating every single thing he did, including his
    mannerisms, speech, walk etc., and now the
    nouveau defense for Bush’s actions is “Well,
    Clinton did it.” and to top that off, Clinton didn’t
    even do it. But the Americans buy it, and so
    does the MSM.

  • Do you think the wingnuts will accept Clinton’s word for it? Their argument will be amended to, this is nothing new Clinton did it and you can’t trust that liar when he denies it.

  • Did Clinton not request information from british intelligence on surveillance that they conducted upon Sen. Strom Thurmond?

  • Force Majure, no that incident was alledged to have occured in the early 1980’s and was made public in 1988. So far as I know it has never been confirmed, but it is clear that even if it did occur it had nothing to do with your boogieman Clinton.

  • Comments are closed.