So much for ‘cooperation’ with the Katrina probe

After Congress created an investigatory committee to review what went wrong in response to the Hurricane Katrina disaster, the White House pledged cooperation. But like so many Bush promises, the assurances were meaningless.

The Bush administration, citing the confidentiality of executive branch communications, said Tuesday that it did not plan to turn over certain documents about Hurricane Katrina or make senior White House officials available for sworn testimony before two Congressional committees investigating the storm response. […]

The White House’s stance on storm-related documents, along with slow or incomplete responses by other agencies, threatens to undermine efforts to identify what went wrong, Democrats on the committees said Tuesday.

“There has been a near total lack of cooperation that has made it impossible, in my opinion, for us to do the thorough investigation that we have a responsibility to do,” Senator Joseph I. Lieberman, Democrat of Connecticut, said at Tuesday’s hearing of the Senate committee investigating the response. His spokeswoman said he would ask for a subpoena for documents and testimony if the White House did not comply.

The announcement that the administration would not cooperate with Congress came a day after reports indicated that the White House was told before Katrina hit that the city would likely be flooded by breached levees — contradicting public statements from the president that no one “anticipated the breach of the levees.”

This sets up a key showdown between the White House and Congress. If ever there was a gut-check opportunity for lawmakers, this is it.

Last fall, the Bush gang blew off requests for documents — relating in particular to communication records between agencies during the crisis — prompting House Government Reform Committee Chairman Tom Davis (R-Va.) to say he was “ready to proceed with subpoenas.” True to form, Davis backed down shortly thereafter.

Now, it’s official. Congress wants records from an administration that badly flubbed a response to a disaster. The administration is refusing to answer questions and, in the process, is thumbing its nose at the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue. What are lawmakers prepared to do about it?

When this special committee was created in Katrina’s wake, congressional Dems initially refused to participate because they assumed Republicans would be afraid to push the administration, even when necessary. This is a chance for the GOP to prove Dems wrong.

Here’s the only question congressional Republicans need to ask themselves in an intellectually serious way: What would they do if this were a Democratic president?

Fascinating logic.

Congress can not conduct oversight over the Executive because everything the Executive does is confidential.

No matter how screwed up they are, no matter how BAD the advice they give the President, it’s confidential.

Blah!

  • Last I checked, the President was supposed to work for us.

    One can argue that there are subject matters on which it is counterproductive to show all the process (security issues come to mind), but what possible rationale can be used to “secret-ify” the response to a natural disaster? Isn’t the republic well-served by figuring out what went wrong and how not to repeat the mistakes of the past? Who is well served by having every conversation in the White House be a secret?

    It’s appalling.

  • “There has been a near total lack of cooperation that has made it impossible, in my opinion, for us to do the thorough investigation that we have a responsibility to do,” Senator Joseph I. Lieberman, Democrat of Connecticut, said at Tuesday’s hearing of the Senate committee investigating the response.

    I think the next JoeMo decides to break with Dems to cooperate with BushCo. insisting that one must engage in good faith negotiations this should be thrown back at him.

  • This is the silliest use of executive privelege I have ever seen. Most would agree that the executive has a need for confidential advice. None seem to agree where that line should be drawn. In this case, what was there to deliberate? Acceptable loss of life and property? God’s will, perhaps?

    They are clearly citing executive privelege in order to conceal their massive failure. No one can honestly argue that executive privelege extends that far.

    If congress pushes back, I wonder how far it will go until the Bush regime starts citing national security for their silence. I can almost hear Scottie McGibberish explain to the gaggle that exposing our disaster recovery plans would only serve to strengthen al qaeda.

  • Why do people think this administration is so great? They are the worst group of people we have ever had in power!

  • Wonder if Senator Vitter will actually, like, represent, the people of his state and scream for answers, or will he keep his mouth shut like a good little republican.

  • “Wonder if Senator Vitter will actually, like, represent, the people of his state and scream for answers, or will he keep his mouth shut like a good little republican.”
    Comment by Scott

    Rhetorical question, right?

  • His spokeswoman said he would ask for a subpoena for documents and testimony if the White House did not comply.

    Doesn’t Lieberman realize that the President, acting as Commander in Chief, does not have to obey subpoenas issued during a time of war?

    Really, how is an all powerful, all knowing POTUS supposed to ru(i)n a country with all of these interruptions from congress?

  • You missed something else just as obscene in that article, CB–the White House tomahawked a bailout plan for homeowners and mortgage lenders.

  • It is not necessary for our Imperial King, or his minions, to deign to answer questions from the subjugated bodies of either the House of Unrepentant or the Seenot.

    Their impudence should have been punished by public horse-whipping, if not draw and quartering. Their sheer gall of presuming to question His Highness or his decrees will soon be unimaginable, as it is now established that His Majesty IS THE LAW, and possesses the power to abrogate or even rewrite that bogus document the Subjects of this land formerly referred to, quaintly, as their Constitution.

    It does give one pause to think: if the Emperor decided to use the US military to attack his domestic enemies, which are legion, WILL THEY COMPLY? Or are there still command grade officers out there that would risk the King’s ire for failing to shoot and kill the Royal Highness’ citizens?

  • “No one anticipated the breach of the levees” – sort of like the explanation of that PDB, huh?

  • Comments are closed.