It’s unanimous — Bush needs to come clean on Abramoff

It’s been 26 days since the Bush gang promised the public a “thorough report” on Jack Abramoff’s White House connections, but the president and his aides are no longer willing to talk about the subject. Who’s urging the White House to come clean? At this point, everyone.

Democrats want the White House to come clean.

Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid urged President Bush Tuesday to “come clean” in next week’s State of the Union speech and acknowledge “the costs of Republican corruption.” […] “President Bush needs to quit stonewalling about his White House’s connection to corruption, and finally tell us how he’s going to reform Washington,” Reid said.

The media want the White House to come clean.

Here is what we don’t know about Jack Abramoff and the White House: whom he met with and what was discussed. Nor, if the White House sticks to its current position, will we learn that anytime soon. Press secretary Scott McClellan told the White House press corps: “If you’ve got some specific issue that you need to bring to my attention, fine. But what we’re not going to do is engage in a fishing expedition that has nothing to do with the investigation.” This is not a tenable position.

The public wants the White House to come clean.

A strong bipartisan majority of the public believes that President Bush should disclose contacts between disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff and White House staff members despite administration assertions that media requests for details about those contacts amount to a “fishing expedition,” according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll. The survey found that three in four — 76 percent — of Americans said Bush should release lists of all meetings between aides and Abramoff…. Two in three Republicans joined with eight in 10 Democrats and political independents in favoring disclosure, according to the poll.

And now congressional Republicans want the White House to come clean.

Republican lawmakers said Sunday that President Bush should publicly disclose White House contacts with Jack Abramoff, the lobbyist who has pleaded guilty to felony charges in an influence-peddling case. Releasing the records would help eliminate suspicions that Abramoff, a top fundraiser for Bush’s re-election campaign, had undue influence on the White House, the Republicans said.

As it happens, these guys really didn’t hold back.

Sen. John Thune (R-S.D.) said, “I’m one who believes that more is better, in terms of disclosure and transparency. And so I’d be a big advocate for making records that are out there available.”

Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.), a leading House conservative, said all White House correspondence, phone calls, and meetings with Abramoff “absolutely” should be released. “I think this president is a man of unimpeachable integrity,” Pence said. “The American people have profound confidence in him. And as Abraham Lincoln said, ‘Give the people the facts and republican governance perhaps will be saved.'”

Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.) said Bush should release the photos to avoid giving Democrats unnecessary political ammunition. “Get it out. Get it out. Come on,” Hagel said, adding the photos will eventually leak out anyway. “I mean, disclosure is the real issue. Whether it’s campaign finance issues, whether it’s ethics issues, whether it’s lobbying issues, disclosure is the best and most effective way to deal with all of these things.”

Your move, Karl.

I’ve got to hand it to Pence…”I think this president is a man of unimpeachable integrity” and “The American people have profound confidence in him…”

Either (1) he needs to get out of his gated community more, or (2) the only people who qualify as “Americans” are those who register Republican.

  • Bu$hCo and his minions have successfully stonewalled many times before, and the Rethug-controlled Congress let them get away with it. Why should this time around be any different, ESPECIALLY when the WH’s cooperation would likely reveal brutally damaging mendacity and incompetence that will burn ALL of the Rethugs?

    Expect more of the same plays out of the same playbook…. and the CCCP will meekly shrug their collective shoulders and go back to bleating about Bush’s great SOTU speech and his “rebounding” in the polls! It’ll be business as usual, while the country and the planet slide towards oblivion…

  • Unfortunately, Pence lives in the dreamworld known as Indiana. And he’s in a long line of idiots (Dan Quayle, Dan Coates, Dan Burton — maybe it’s the name, I dunno!) from my proud (?) state.

    I never understood my fellow Hoosier voters’ attraction for Pence. He’s not a man of ideas (well, actually he does have ideas — they’re just a hundred years old or so), or action and he’s got a personality of stone.

    But, he’s got some cute blonde kids and follows the Fox line so I guess that puts him in with Hoosiers (who, unfortunately, pretty much buy that line and repeat it ad naseum).

    At least we did have Birch Bayh back in the day and (at one time) an “honest” conservative in Richard Lugar (before he became just a Bush rubber stamp). Evan Bayh may turn out to be okay if he can ever decide to become a consistent Democrat!

  • What dreamworld does that clown live in?

    The United (subsidiary) States of ( Corprate) America. one (multinational) entity, under God (as a public relations cover), (morally) indefensible, with liberty and justice for all (who can afford it). .

  • Pence…”I think this president is a man of unimpeachable integrity”

    Notice the clever use of the word “Unimpeachable”.

    Wonder how often we will be seeing that show up in Republican language?

  • Are Thune and Pence out of their minds? God knows what’s going to come out of the Abramoff investigation next. The White House, from a purely defensive position, is right to stall and obfuscate.

    BTW, I haven’t posted much here lately (time constraints) but the last time I did, I wrote about a Mississippi company, Travron Inc. which appeared to have been sold to members of the Coushatta Tribe by Travis Lott in 1999. Travis Lott was a former director of the Gulf Regional Airport Authority and is now a director of the Gulf Foreign Trade Zone, two patronage jobs, but I don’t know if he is related to Trent Lott.

    I first posted about Travon in the TPM Cafe on November 29. On December 7, the Travron corporate registration was amended and filed with the Mississippi Secretary of State. Three officers including Lovelin Poncho, president, were removed and new officers, all with Louisiana addresses were named. Poncho was Coushatta tribal chairman in the Abramoff era. Hmm…

  • No surprise that the rats are deserting a sinking ship. It’s the smart play for them. If Bush rides out the storm they will become his biggest supporters once again.

    If he doesn’t, they will exclaim, “I am shocked, shocked I say, to find that this awful stuff that I had absolutely nothing to do with was happening right under my nose without any knowledge on my part at all nope nope nope nope nope. Now kindly re-elect me because it wasn’t my fault, ok?”

    Can you spell “pond scum”?

    I knew you could!! 🙂

  • Hey, I live in NV, and I’d like Harry Reid to come clean!!! How about that 60,000 smakaroonis he took???

  • Helen–any idea what Reid got from the tribes BEFORE Abramoff took many of them over as clients? Odds are he got more from them before Abramoff, and that Abramoff’s influence ended up causing Reid to receive less. You can be darn near certain, though, that Abramoff did not steer any money to Reid.

  • This is pretty alarming!
    ———————————————————————————-

    Feb. 03, 2006
    Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal

    Tribes gave to Reid after hiring Abramoff

    By TONY BATT
    STEPHENS WASHINGTON BUREAU

    WASHINGTON — Sen. Harry Reid of Nevada began receiving campaign contributions from at least four American Indian tribes only after they hired Jack Abramoff, Republicans charged this week in an effort to tie the Senate Democratic leader to the disgraced lobbyist.

    On Thursday, Reid shrugged off questions about money he received from tribal clients of Abramoff, who pleaded guilty last month to three felonies after being accused of exchanging meals, travel and gifts for political favors.
    Advertisement

    “I’ve said that I received money from Indians in the past and will continue to do so,” Reid said.

    Asked what he would say about tribes who did not give him money until after hiring Abramoff, Reid said, “What I’ve said all along.”

    The National Republican Senatorial Committee this week revived a charge that Reid received more than $50,000 from four tribes with gaming interests between 2001 and 2004 after they hired Abramoff. The Nevadan had received no money from those tribes before then, Republicans said.

    The donations included:

    • $19,500 from the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians of California.

    • $5,000 from the Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana.

    • $7,000 from the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians.

    • $19,000 from the Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan.

    “Harry Reid’s ties to Jack Abramoff are too substantial for him to dismiss with Washington, D.C., denial and hypocritical accusations,” Republican spokesman Tucker Bounds said.

    Reid has acknowledged receiving $61,000 from tribal clients and lobbying colleagues of Abramoff. He has said the money was legally raised, that he has done nothing improper and does not plan to refund the donations.

    An analysis by the Center for Responsive Politics, a campaign watchdog group, shows that Indian gaming tribes as a general proposition increased their political donations substantially since the late 1990s, spreading money wider and deeper among members of Congress.

    In the 1998 election cycle, tribes donated $1.5 million. In the 2004 cycle donations had increased to $7.2 million, the center found.

    Gaming tribes “didn’t break $2 million until 2000, and then it started going up,” said center spokesman Massie Ritsch. “How much was due to Abramoff’s influence, I don’t know, He did not represent all the tribes.”

    The American Prospect, a self-described liberal publication, commissioned a study of donations by Indian tribes that Abramoff represented compared to tribes who were not clients.

    The study, performed by campaign finance specialists Dwight L. Morris and Associates, suggests “it’s likely that Abramoff had little impact on giving to Democrats,” the publication said in a Jan. 27 report.

  • Comments are closed.