The gang that can’t shoot straight

There are any number of interesting angles to the story surrounding Cheney’s hunting incident, but I still think the one that raises the most questions is about the delay in public notification. Given what we know, it almost seems as if the White House was never going to tell anyone that the Vice President shot someone.

The more than 18-hour delay in news emerging that the Vice President of the United States had shot a man, sending him to an intensive care unit with his wounds, grew even more curious late Sunday. E&P has learned that the official confirmation of the shooting came about only after a local reporter in Corpus Christi, Texas, received a tip from the owner of the property where the shooting occured and called Vice President Cheney’s office for confirmation.

The confirmation was made but there was no indication whether the Vice President’s office, the White House, or anyone else intended to announce the shooting if the reporter, Jaime Powell of the Corpus Christ Caller-Times, had not received word from the ranch owner.

One of Powell’s colleagues at paper, Beth Francesco, told E&P that Powell had built up a strong source relationship with the prominent ranch owner, Katharine Armstrong, which led to the tip. Powell is chief political reporter for the paper and also covers the area where the ranch is located south of Sarita.

Armstrong called the paper Sunday morning looking for Powell, who was not at work. When they did talk, Armstrong revealed the shooting of prominent Austin attorney Harry Whittington, who is now in stable condition in a hospital. Powell then called Cheney’s office for the confirmation around midday. The newspaper broke the story at mid-afternoon — not a word about it had appeared before then.

Asked if the information would have ever come out if Armstrong hadn’t called her friend in the local media, Cheney’s office “would not comment.”

This seems more than a little odd. As Josh asked, “The vice president shoots someone seriously enough to require ICU treatment in the hospital and the White House doesn’t see fit to make a public announcement?”

The answer, apparently, is yes.

In this case, there was a very tight lid on the information. The Secret Service notified the local sheriff’s office and top White House officials the day of the shooting, but no one else — outside the staff at the hospital that treated Whittington — knew about the incident.

At this point, there’s been no explanation for the delay.

Francesco, at the Corpus Christi paper, said she felt it was a bit odd that her newsroom had not received any information about the shooting since “we often call law enforcement in area, even on weekends. We checked in and didn’t hear anything about it.”

While E&P was first to raise the question about the delay Sunday afternoon, Frank James, reporter in the Chicago Tribune’s Washington bureau, put his how spin on it later in the day, asking, “How is it that Vice President Cheney can shoot a man, albeit accidentally, on Saturday during a hunting trip and the American public not be informed of it until today?”

Indeed, others raised questions as well. “There was no immediate reason given as to why the incident wasn’t reported until Sunday,” The Dallas Morning News observed. “The sheriff’s office in Kenedy County did not respond to phone calls Sunday.” […]

The delay in announcing the shooting “will likely be the main question asked of the White House about the apparent accidental shooting of a 78-year-old man during a Texas hunting trip by the vice president,” the Tribune’s James wrote on the Washington bureau’s blog at the newspaper’s site.

“When a vice president of the U.S. shoots a man under any circumstance,” James noted, “that is extremely relevant information. What might be the excuse to justify not immediately making the incident public?”

The White House’s reputation for preferring secrecy to sunlight is well-established, but there’s no reason to hide an accident. I imagine there’s a temptation to spare Cheney some embarrassment, but the Bush gang will need a better excuse than this.

It’s hardly unreasonable, given the circumstances, to wonder when the phrase “cover up” will be taken seriously.

what i found even more striking than the secrecy and the utterly careless act that led to its need, is the fact that cheney is followed by so many medical personal as if he’s about to drop dead at any minute.

  • I think the whole story’s hilarious. NRA chums blow “gun safety” big time. When the story’s finally blown (a day late) Cheney’s people are spinning it like Whittington’s spending the day chortling at the country club, while others say he’s in ICU. We’re asked to trust these guys with a war (wars) when they can’t handle a dove hunt. I wonder what they did to offend Katharine Armstrong?

  • Yeah I had my laughs at Cheney & Co’s expense along with everyone else, but after reading this, I’m no longer laughing…

    Monday’s hunting trip to Pennsylvania by Vice President Dick Cheney in which he reportedly shot more than 70 stocked pheasants and an unknown number of mallard ducks at an exclusive private club places a spotlight on an increasingly popular and deplorable form of hunting, in which birds are pen-reared and released to be shot in large numbers by patrons. The ethics of these hunts are called into question by rank-and-file sportsmen, who hunt animals in their native habitat and do not shoot confined or pen-raised animals that cannot escape.

    The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported today that 500 farm-raised pheasants were released yesterday morning at the Rolling Rock Club in Ligonier Township for the benefit of Cheney’s 10-person hunting party. The group killed at least 417 of the birds, illustrating the unsporting nature of canned hunts. The party also shot an unknown number of captive mallards in the afternoon.

    “This wasn’t a hunting ground. It was an open-air abattoir, and the vice president should be ashamed to have patronized this operation and then slaughtered so many animals,” states Wayne Pacelle, a senior vice president of The Humane Society of the United States. “If the Vice President and his friends wanted to sharpen their shooting skills, they could have shot skeet or clay, not resorted to the slaughter of more than 400 creatures planted right in front of them as animated targets.”

    I’m not a hunter, and never will be, but my wife’s grandfather and uncles duck-hunt and I suppose that’s fine. But what Cheney does is the equivelent to shooting fish in a barrel. That’s not hunting—that’s skeet shooting with living targets. Does one get bored after shooting their 30th pheasent? 40th? 60th?

    That’s a callous disregard for life that speaks of sociopathy. That’s not a kid killing or torturing animals that’s the supposed moral leadership of the country gunning down living birds for shits and giggles.

    A serious question: When somebody can suit up for the day and kill fifty to a hundred of anything—where does one draw a line? Birds only? Or would Cheney and pals shoot deer in a corrall? Big game in a zoo? It’s the stuff of science fiction—but these are the kind of maniacs that would be hunting people if they could.

    As far as the guy he shot, if this was one of those expeditions and he was a party to it, any sympathy for him just flew out the window. Every one of them deserves a nice “peppering” of birdshot.

    A 78 year old asshole is every bit as deserving as a cage-raised quail.

  • I’m waiting for someone to put the spin on the whole story. To begin with, Whittington comes up “behind” Cheney, as Cheney is sighting on a covey. If Whittington is “behind” Cheney, then what kind of marksmanship trick is the VP employing, in order to shotgun someone who’s nowhere near being in the line of fire? If I’m aiming a gun to the West, how do I hit a target that’s to the East—behind me, for crying out loud? And, if the bird took off in Whittington’s direction (quail, by the way, tend to flee sensed danger by flying away from that sensed danger—this one would have had to fly right by Cheney and alongside Whittington), how did Cheney follow the bird around with the gun, sight on it, and not see another human in the line of fire?

    This ought to be as good as those “18 minutes of blank tape” from the Nixon era….

  • They were waiting to see if the guy was going to die or not before making it public.

    If he died, it would have been covered up.

  • Angry Young Man,

    Dick Cheney could die at any moment. With the pacemaker, the cardiac “incidents” and the secret hospitalizations for “old knee injuries,” it’s pretty clear Dick isn’t long for the world. It’s a scandal the White House won’t come clean about Cheney’s medical condition.

  • Gotta go with Josh that it is strange the WH is mum and left it to Armstrong to do the PR work.

    I was tring to think of a clever comment on how Cheney getting his multiple deferrments was a good thing but decided that it would be tack to take pot shots (no pun intended) a Cheny at someone else’s expense.

  • I suspect we’ll hear more about Mr. Whittington’s true condition eventually.

    I’ll be the first to suggest it: you know that there is a “talk like a pirate” day? I suggest we declare a “talk like Elmer Fudd” day in honor of this event.

  • What Im curious about is, when Cheney is away in his “bunker”, exactly how much time does he spend working, and how much is fartin around shootin stuff time? Also, what type of hunting does he engage in? It’s hard to imagine someone in such poor health would be able to hunt quail the way you normally would – walking around in the woods, with dogs, flushing out quail from a natural environment, then attempting to shoot them. Im guessing his hunting is more along the Texas style of release and shoot. I also wonder if he has ever engaged in any of the rather unsavory types of hunts that go on in this country, where endangered animals are basically put in front of you with a big target on it, you shoot it, then hang it on the wall. Me thinks the reason this was kept under wraps is that it says a lot about the leisure activities that such a man finds rewarding, the amount of time he actually works, and the pathetic condition he is really in.

  • Cheney is finally picking on somebody his own size in shooting at lawyers who can take his ass to court.. not defenseless little birdies.

  • What they don’t want to come out is that they weren’t hunting quail, they were hunting humans.

    Cheney specifies his quarry must be older than 75.

  • There once was a hunter named Dick
    Whose pull on the trigger was quick
    But is aim was quite scarey
    When he plugged ol friend Harry
    and then tried to hush up his trick

  • In the Veep’s defense, he didn’t think they were hunting quail so much as they were hunting Quayle. And a human is the one thing the Veep hasn’t shot during a canned hunt (sure, out in the wilds of Wyoming, maybe one or two, but that was with a high-powered rifle at considerable distance), so when they called and told him about the Quayle hunt…well damn!

    And everyone knows that Quayle tends to be a bit of a sneak, so when the twig snapped behind Cheney he was on him faster than a NSA wiretap on a father-son phone conversation about the long bomb thrown at the company picnic football game.

  • 8 simple questions:

    1 How do we know it’s accidental? Why just take the property owner’s word for it?
    2 What typically happens when a hunter shoots another hunter? License suspended? Investigation? Nothing? Let’s follow the law on this.
    3 What if a hunter had “accidentally” shot the VP? Are we supposed to belief that the VP is allowed to engage in an activity when people are “often” shot by accident?
    4 Are the other hunters really armed? If so, how does the Secret Service protect the VP?
    5 Is it plausible that 28 guage blast from 30 yards away will cause the injury described?
    6 Who else was there? Shouldn’t everyone be required to give an account?
    7 Should the VP — or any VP — ever be allowed to hunt again?
    8 Was the VP medicated? What does he take for his medical conditions?

  • “I suggest we declare a “talk like Elmer Fudd” day in honor of this event.” — smiley

    “Be wery wery cwite, I’m hunting Texan lawyers.”

    Cheney doing his own bit for tort reform.

  • The report quoted by Mr. Furious is truly
    shocking. If anyone had any doubts that
    Cheney is a mean sob, a sociopath, that
    should dispel them. The man is subhuman.

  • Wouldn’t it would just be rich for the WH to cite privacy? Afterall the only people who want privacy are people who have something to hide.

  • Well, I’m a hunter…big time. Paid my way through college and grad school guiding people in the marshes and ricefields of SE Texas.

    There is no excuse for peppering a fellow hunter. None. Period. The person who fires the gun has the sole responsibility to assure…prior to shoulder the gun…the exact location of every hunter prior to flushing the covey. Even then, the rule is to not squeeze a round if the line of fire is within 45 deg. of a fellow hunter (which means you ensure that those who aren’t walking up the covey are directly behind you….no exceptions). Moreover, when quail hunting, two and only two folks are to have shooting privileges….the rest lay behind and wait their turn. Finally, after all that, when the birds are flushed, the proper safety guideline is to make sure that the quail clears the horizon at a minimum of 30 deg. before you fluff it.

    It matters not one wit whether the old man walked into parallel position w/ the VEEP.

    And the above references to the ethics shooting pen birds are exactly correct….even if it was a flying pen. What makes this even more absurd and preventable is that pen raised birds may….a big may….fly a mere 60 yds. before dumping back down, as compared to wild coveys that scatter like crazy and put at minimum 125 yds. between them and the hunter before landing.

    That means that the VEEP should have not only pulled off the bird when it came back, but by not shooting he would have to walk a mere 40 yds. or so to flush it again.

    It’s not hunting….by any stretch of the imagination….when flushing pen birds. The bad thing is that a party rarely….if ever….kills all the pen-raised birds. Those that are left do not have the instincts of wild birds and are nothing but a feather-covered sandwich for the next song dog (eg. coyote), bobcat, hawk, fireants, etc. Those that do survive taint and nest taint the genetic pool of the wild birds to the point that the chicks oftentimes lack the wild instincts of their free-roam brothers and sisters (especially if the pen-raised bird is the hen).

    The fault lies strictly and solely with Cheney. There is zero excuse for this to happen….none. It’s a mistake that would cause me to take my 8 y/o’s gun away for 2+ seasons, and make him retake the hunter safety and gun safety course 3 more times before he regained privileges.

    I’m pissed off about them putting the burden on Whittington. He should be, too.

  • The Rovians’ PR genius is how they used Ms. Armstrong for the initial disclosure–distancing, distancing!–and how well-coached she was. Whittington hadn’t been shot, he was “peppered,” and it’s so common that even Armstrong herself has been peppered. It almost sounds like fun, doesn’t it! Wouldn’t you like to be a Pepper, too? Rovians don’t need a reason to cover up, and then lie when found out. It’s their instinctive response to everything. The only suspense is how they will package the deceit.

  • W Action:

    I doubt very seriously that Rove & Co., Inc. “coached” her to that he was “peppered.” That’s an extremely common colloquiem, and frankly the term of choice, used by us hunters down here in Texas….regardless of one’s political affiliation.

    Trust me when I say I’m as yelladawg a D and populist as anyone you’ll ever meet, and the first descriptive term I used in my first post to describe the gross negligence of Cheney was “peppering.”

    Check out the first sentence of the second para. in post 20…

    And I, too, have been peppered 3 separate times: hell’s bells, one old man I was guiding shot 1/3 of the bill of my hat off one morning when he was a mere 2 feet away….not only ruined my favorite huntin’ hat, he caused me to metaphorically pollute my waders. My right ear is still ringing (seriously, a permanent tinnitus resulted b/c the muzzle of his Model 12 was only 4 inches from my right ear) and that was 17 years ago.

    I immediately made the old bastard, his son, and his grandson case up their guns and go home.

    Gun control is not eliminating weapons from the public domain, it’s making sure the gunowner knows that there is no second chance when it comes mistakes.

    There is rarely, if ever, a true hunting accident that could not have been prevented by the exercise of commonsense, common knowledge gun safety precautions. I’ve only heard of one that I would consider an “accident”…more appropriately, a freak accident. Fortunately, no one died.

  • Comments are closed.