DeLay nervously lashes out at primary rival

In Texas’ 22nd District, former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R) routinely faces token opposition in Republican primaries. The challengers are never taken seriously; DeLay never deigns to even pretend they exist; and local Republican voters always dispatch the primary opposition at the polls easily.

But this year’s different. DeLay’s constituents may be conservative, but they are getting sick of him and his ethical scandals. Moreover, DeLay has a real primary opponent, Tom Campbell, whose campaign is generating serious attention.

Campbell, a lawyer in DeLay’s home town of Sugar Land, worked on Bob Dole’s and the elder George Bush’s presidential campaigns. Moreover, Campbell gained valuable federal experience serving as general counsel to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration under Bush. Far from facing derision from Texas Republicans for taking on DeLay, Campbell’s campaign manager is a former Harris County Republican Party official.

How nervous is this making DeLay? Consider this: for the first time in his life, DeLay is not only acknowledging a primary opponent, he’s lashing out against him publicly.

U.S. Rep. Tom DeLay’s campaign attacked the credentials of his main primary opponent Tuesday, claiming that Tom Campbell lied about his role in local politics, disagrees with the state Republican platform and hasn’t voted regularly.

The attack marks the first time that DeLay, R-Sugar Land, has gone on the offensive for the seat he has held comfortably for more than 20 years. It also follows television ads by Campbell’s campaign suggesting that DeLay is distracted by his legal troubles.

DeLay’s campaign alleged that Campbell, a Houston attorney, “tried to hide the fact” that he’s voted in only two Republican primaries since registering to vote in Fort Bend County a dozen years ago. The campaign also alleged that Campbell lied about his activities with the Fort Bend Republican Party, that he is raising money outside the district and that his campaign commercial contains footage from Michigan.

Are the charges against Campbell legitimate? I don’t know, and frankly, it doesn’t matter. The point is that DeLay is a powerful, 11-term incumbent in a district whose lines were literally drawn by DeLay’s lawyers. And right now, he’s so worried about losing a Republican primary that he’s on the attack against a guy no one ever heard of up until a few months ago.

The Texas primary is March 7. I don’t seriously think DeLay will lose, but it’s oddly entertaining to see him sweat it out.

Maybe Campbell could improve his chances by blasting DeLay in the face with birdshot?

  • It pleases me that there’ll be a second, bonus, round of the “F*** Tom DeLay” referendum in Texas this year. Campbell should be happy; I hope Campbell is running with this: “Tom DeLay called me a liar? That’s rich, coming from a crook like him.”

  • The Texas primary is March 7. I don’t seriously think DeLay will lose, but it’s oddly entertaining to see him sweat it out.

    Assuming DeLay wins the primary, care to share your thoughts on whether or not he’ll win in November?

  • Delay’s nasty mouth will sink him. People are tired of attack politics. This still wouldn’t stop him from killing off Campbell’s chances by running as a writein or independent. And he would cut his own throat to do it. I can’t wait for this melee.

  • If I was a Dem donor with a hell of a lot to spread around, I would make a very substantial contribution to Campbell’s campaign, if it could threaten to sink DeLay.

    Then, if DeLay loses this primary, he becomes a much more fruitful anecdote against Republican corruption when Democrats are discussing things on the national scale.

  • Delay losing the Republican primary might make a better anecdote against corruption, but I think the Dems have a better chance of winning Delay’s seat if Delay is the opponent. And as a TX Democrat, I must say that his seat going to a Dem would be a truly delightful thing.

  • This may be an interesting harbinger of how much “attack fatigue” might affect campaigns this year. The Republicans have done so much of it for so many years now, might some of the public be less inclined to pay attention to it than before? It really is just the same old stuff, only the names and specific details vary.

    It would sure be nice if it started damaging the attackers more than the attackees for a change.

    And even if DeLay is dumped but the Republican candidate still wins, he’ll still be just another freshman in Congress without much clout or influence, so it will still be an improvement over having DeLay in office himself.

  • Hm, ok Sagacity, point taken. I was assuming that a Democratic win would be a long-shot, but I know next-to-nothing about DeLay’s district.

    If a Democratic win is a long-shot, though, then I stand by my comment at #6– I’m just imagining the copy that would last for months: “couldn’t even make it past the primary, due to the cloud of corruption hanging over him. . .” and so on.

  • Comments are closed.