Herbert to Cheney: ‘It’s time to go’

The New York Times’ Bob Herbert hasn’t been pulling any punches when it comes to the Bush White House, but today, I’m fairly sure Herbert became the first writer for a major newspaper to call for Dick Cheney’s resignation.

Herbert uses the shooting incident as a kick-off point, but his case has far more to do with Cheney’s overall record, not one poorly-handled accident. As Herbert sees it, Cheney embraces secrecy and shuns transparency because his record — on Iraq, classified leaks, secret meetings with energy companies, etc. — is “not the kind you want to hold up for intense scrutiny.”

Mr. Cheney is arrogant, defiant and at times blatantly vulgar. He once told Senator Patrick Leahy to perform a crude act upon himself.

A vice president who insists on writing his own rules, who shudders at the very idea of transparency in government, whose judgment on crucial policy issues has been as wildly off the mark (and infinitely more tragic) as his actions in Texas over the weekend, and who has now become an object of relentless ridicule, cannot by any reasonable measure be thought of as an asset to the nation or to the president he serves.

The Bush administration would benefit from new thinking and new perspectives on the war in Iraq, the potential threat from Iran, the nation’s readiness to cope with another terror attack, the development of a comprehensive energy policy and other important issues. […]

Mr. Cheney would do his nation and his president a service by packing his bags and heading back to Wyoming. He’s become a joke. But not a funny one.

OK, Bob, now tell us what you really think.

Atrios’ responded to Herbert’s column by saying, “On the whole Cheney’s resignation would be bad for Democrats. Better to keep the snarl in place to scare the children and the voters. But, yes, his resignation would be good for the country.”

I’m very much inclined to agree. When it comes to politics, Cheney’s departure removes an unpopular figure and clears the way for Bush to tap an heir apparent. But when it comes to the integrity of the government, a Cheney resignation would be an immediate improvement to the administration.

Dick won’t go down without a fight, guns blazing…

Sorry, take 5 pounds of crap out of a 50 pound bag o’crap, and you’re still left with a big bag o’crap.

  • a Cheney resignation would be an immediate improvement to the administration.

    Not knowing who Bush would appoint, this isn’t necessarily so. If Bush were forced to jettison Cheney, his likely response would be an enormous F-you to his critics. Think Tom Coburn or Dana Rohrabacher.

    When Nixon picked Ford to replace Agnew, it was because the elders in congress told him he had to. There’s no similar constraint on Bush now. And he’s a particularly vindictive SOB.

  • Best be Cheney be gone before the Republicans lose the Senate in 2006, ’cause masa Bush is wanting to pick his sucessor for 2008 and he needs a compliant Senate. 😉

    Really, I’m of two minds on this. If Cheney does resign, then the Republican controlled Senate and House get to vote in his replacement, who immediately becomes the front runner for the Republican nomination in 2008 (not necessarily a great thing, when you think about it).

    ..Section 2 of the 25th Amendment provides that “Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.” ..

    If Cheney stays until after 2006 and the Democrats win in the House, then they can vote out articles of impeachment. I know that Cheney CLAIMS that there is an executive order giving him the authority to declassify the National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq, but I would really like to see this thing. And leaking parts of a NIE through your chief of staff is not proper declassification of top secret information. And the VP giving orders on 9/11 to shoot down an commerical airliner that had no terrorists aboard was also a violation of law. And frankly, his keeping his stock options for Haliburton while ensuring they got all the bidding opportunitities for Iraq reconstruction before the war (because they had the security clearances to know that we were planning to invade ?????, please!) is defrauding the American public.

    If the Democrats don’t win the Senate, it would still be great to impeach the guy!

    If the Democrats don’t win either house outright, I expect them to make gains. The ducks in the WH are going to get more lame all the time.

  • There’s a big thread shaping up over at Kos on this topic in response to a column (trial balloon?) by of all people, the WSJ’s Peggy Noonan.

    One scenario that they might be able to pull off is installing someone like George Allen. Set him up as a crusader/reformer coming in to clean up in Cheney’s wake.

    I’ve long thought they’d tap someone like Condi—an insider, loyal, and the bonus of being a black woman. Some discount her chances because it would upset a certain faction of the GOP base. I say bullshit. What willl be the neanderthal faction’s alternative in 2008? Hillary? They will grudgingly vote for Rice…

    I’m leaning away from Rice at the moment, however, because I think the White House really might need to go outside the circle for appearence’s sake.

    Cheney always has the health card to play, and as lon as he doesn’t throw it in the midst of an active scandal, it willl work. If Cheney exits, he can assume much of the White House’s baggage, and it might breathe new life into the Administration’s chances.

    Regardless of a victory for the GOP in 2008, Cheney will be pardoned of any trouble that arises for him no longer having the protection of the office.

  • Republicans – all of them – are by corrupt through and through. I hate to think of who they’d come up with to replace Shooter. Better to keep the scary clown (though he probably won’t come out of his rat hole anymore).

  • It’s hard to think of the white house without that lovable steely eyed crooked smiling rascal lurking in the shadows. Cheney’s departure would force the hidden shadow government behind the puppet king to bring in a new face that will not interfere with hands on control of the chimp in chief…… but not be too obvious about it. I think Brownie would do a heck of a job.

  • Ed – You made a “funny,” even if that is not what you intended. First, a Scooter resigns, now people are wonderiing if a Shooter should resign. Who’s next? A Hooter? A Tooter?

  • the president he serves??

    Hmmmm ……only nominally and only on the org chart. In reality isn’t it the other way around? After all the WH deferred to Cheney with regards to informing the public of this incident.

  • “I’m leaning away from Rice at the moment, however, because I think the White House really might need to go outside the circle for appearence’s sake.” — Mr. Furious

    Nope, Rice is thought by some to be the anti-Rumsfled, anti-Cheney force in the White House. If Cheney goes, she works fine. Besides, since when does the White House care about appearances with anyone but their 40% base?

    Sen George Allen (VA) on the other hand has the potential to annoy a whole covey (word used advisedly) of Republican Senators who are trying for the 2008 nomination. Rice they will think they have a great chance of defeating.

  • Dick Cheney must stay put. He is the albatross hanging from George W’s neck. For the Democrats, Cheney’s a five-story neon sign that says “Culture of Corruption, Contempt for Democracy.”

  • I suspect the nod would go to Santorum, since his days are numbered as the junior Senator from PA.
    He plays well to the bible thumpers…

  • “But when it comes to the integrity of the government, a Cheney resignation would be an immediate improvement to the administration.”

    Hate to disagree, but as long as Karl Rove is in the White House integrity in and of the government will be nonexistent.

  • Dick Cheney has been ‘dicking’ America for the longest time, and we are not doing anything that really matters to stop him. Because of that, to Dick, America is a sitting duck.

  • Comments are closed.