Dick Cheney has routinely enjoyed scrutiny-free weekend hunting trips, with reporters having shown little interest in covering the VP’s occasional recreational breaks. First, unlike the president, Cheney refuses to release a schedule. Second, pictures of Cheney shooting a quail hardly make for interesting journalism.
As a result, Cheney can usually come and go without much attention. After all, the assumption has always been, if something newsworthy were to happen on one of these outings, surely the White House would let the public know.
Obviously, the world now knows that this isn’t the case. And as National Journal’s Marc Ambinder noted today, news outlets are no longer willing to take the chance of missing a story.
We hear that major television networks and some print entities are trying to figure out a way to follow the Vice President during his weekend sojourns. […]
[T]he networks are thinking about establishing an informal pool to stake out the Naval Observatory and to exchange, on a limited basis, editorial information to facilitate that pool. Print outlets will also ramp up their coverage.
This may be harder than it sounds — Marine choppers often ferry the VP from the Observatory to nearby destinations and to Andrews Air Force Base, where planes designated as Air Force II are kept ready for takeoff — but Ambinder offers some tips.
If a helicopter takes off from — or lands at — the Observatory, neighbors surely notice. (Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton is one of them.) And the aircraft arrival and departure frequencies for the Washington, D.C. area are public and not encrypted.
Usually, the vice president’s airplane is given the call sign “Air Force Two” — which means that any scanner buff with a cheap 1980s’ model handheld radio scanner can figure out if the Vice President is leaving or coming — and when. (We’ve heard the call sign ourselves on our trusty Pro-96.)
That knowledge won’t compromise security — but it might help the media keep tabs on a very private VP.
Note to Dick: you brought this on yourself. If you didn’t want increased media scrutiny, you shouldn’t have hid the news about shooting a man.