President Bush has been routinely criticized for his lack of curiosity, but his visit to India this week has magnified just how little the president cares about foreign countries and their culture.
Newsweek’s Richard Wolffe and Holly Bailey noted that when Clinton visited India in 2000, he spent a week touring the country, “famously visiting rural villages and wowing Indian politicians during a speech before the Parliament.”
And then there’s the current president, demonstrating his interest — or lack thereof — in a fascinating country with a burgeoning culture, rich history, and diverse population.
Bush’s visit this week will be speedy and meticulously coordinated. Indeed, the president won’t even visit the Taj Mahal — an omission he blamed on the White House scheduler. “If I were the scheduler, maybe I’d do things differently,” he told a group of Indian journalists last week.
It’s something that has puzzled the locals, at a time when Bush hopes to deepen economic and political ties with the world’s largest democracy. It also frustrates his own aides, who have repeatedly pushed the president to spend time on the softer, cultural side of his foreign travel. According to those aides, it is the president — not his scheduler — who cannot be convinced to carve out time to respect the local culture.
I find it impossible to relate on a personal level, but Bush apparently just doesn’t seem interested. No museums, no cultural or historical landmarks, no meaningful interaction with Indians. For that matter, the fact that he’d blame his aides is not only dishonest, it’s cowardly — he’s arguably the most powerful man in the free world, but he won’t visit the Taj Mahal unless his scheduler tells him it’s okay? Does he expect people to believe this?
The India trip wasn’t unusual in this regard. In November, Bush took a week-long trip through East Asia. As he barnstormed through Japan, South Korea and China, the president “visited no museums, tried no restaurants, bought no souvenirs and made no effort to meet ordinary local people.”
There are, to be sure, security concerns. Before any president can wander into a store or a restaurant, precautions have to be taken, and that no doubt limits Bush’s options. This does not, however, fully explain the president’s lack of curiosity. After all, Clinton spent a week in India exploring different parts of the county and engaging in conversation with as many regular people as he could.
The difference, it seems, is that Bush just doesn’t care. Why this man asked to be a world leader, despite having little to no interest in the world, is something I will never understand.