The Washington Post’s attempt at ‘balance’

The New York Times’ two most recent additions to its legendary stable of op-ed columnists are David Brooks and John Tierney, both conservatives. CNN’s three most recent additions to the network’s political coverage are former Republican congressman J.C. Watts, moralist Bill Bennett, and far-right radio host Glenn Beck, all conservatives. And so when the Washington Post decided to expand its online operation by adding a new blog, I suppose it wasn’t terribly surprising that it chose Ben Domenech, a hardline conservative who used to work for Bush.

But the more one considers how and why this happened, the more ridiculous it is.

A former contributing editor to National Review Online, Domenech later became what he calls “the youngest political appointee of President George W. Bush.” After a stint as chief speechwriter for Senator John Cornyn (R-Tex.), he co-founded RedState.org and became a book editor at Regnery Publishing, where he worked with Michelle Malkin and others.

The idea, apparently, is to offer WaPo blog readers “balance” — with Domenech on the right and Dan Froomkin on the left. This is, of course, patently absurd. Froomkin is a professional journalist who offers hard-hitting analysis of the Bush administration. He is not a partisan, nor a hack, nor an ideologue. He’s written for the Post for a decade, on top of having written for the Winston-Salem Journal, the Miami Herald, and the Orange County Register. Froomkin is also deputy editor of niemanwatchdog.org, the web site of the Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University.

If President Kerry were in office, Froomkin’s “White House Watch” column would be as aggressive as it is now. As Froomkin himself has explained, “I do not advocate policy, liberal or otherwise. My agenda, such as it is, is accountability and transparency. I believe that the president of the United States, no matter what his party, should be subject to the most intense journalistic scrutiny imaginable.” Just as importantly, Froomkin brings 18 years of experience as a journalist to the task.

Domenech, on the other hand, is another creature entirely. He’s a 24-year-old Republican writer. Domenech has an agenda — to promote a far-right worldview and defend Republicans against any and all criticism. He is, for lack of a better word, an advocate. Already, his blog, called “Red America,” exists to promote the Republican Party, cast conservatives in a positive light, and denounce the left.

Froomkin provides a professional journalist’s take on news and events related to the White House. Domenech provides a conservative activist’s take on why Republicans are right about everything. If this is “balance,” the establishment media needs less of it, not more.

Look, if the Post wants to hire a right-wing blogger, that’s the Post’s business. It can make Ann Coulter a legal analyst, Sean Hannity responsible for election coverage, and put Fred Phelps in charge of covering war casualties. It can become the Wall Street Journal op-ed page, the Washington Times, and Fox News. It’s a private enterprise and it can do as it pleases.

But the Post continues to believe it can maintain credibility while kowtowing to conservative whining, and that’s why the paper deserves all the criticism it’s receiving. As Josh noted, if the Post is so concerned about “balance,” it could hire an actual liberal.

If they want to make a blogger Crossfire with a firebreather on the left and on the right, they should do it. It might even be interesting. But here they’ve just been played by bullies and played for fools.

The establishment media probably doesn’t realize how ridiculous it appears when it tries to make the right happy by hiring hacks like Ben Domenech. Conservatives have screamed “liberal media” for a generation to help undermine news outlets that shine a light on their misdeeds. There was never a kernel of truth to the claim that news outlets had an ideological axe to grind, but it didn’t matter — if the right could kill the messenger, it could kill the message.

So, we get results like these. J.C. Watts is now a political analyst for CNN. Ben Domenech has been promoted to a high-profile writing position at one of the nation’s most prestigious news outlets. The Sunday-morning news shows, on every network, allow conservative voices to dominate for a decade.

The establishment media thinks it’s offering balance. It’s actually embarrassing itself.

It’s a pretty good sign of the zeitgeist. “Balance” used to be about liberal vs conservative. Now it’s about fact-based vs fantasy-based. Hey, the fantasy-based tradition deserves representation too.

  • Hey CB,
    It’s Bill Bennett — Bob Bennett is his brother, who is a big-time Washington lawyer (one of Bill Clinton’s hired guns during Whitewater and impeachment).

    PS — Get yourself another cup of coffee.

  • Oh, it’s just dull and stupid. These old world behemoths are chasing Fox’s tail at the exact moment when the right wing punditocracy is becoming ridiculous. We are already well past the tipping point where the public has moved past their ideas. If these media corps had any brains at all they would realize that Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert et al are the models they should be following, not Brit Hume, Instapundit and Bill O’Reilly.

    At some point in the near future there will be a seismic shift in American politics when a genuine alternative to Bush emerges and at that point these morons will all be fired out of a cannon as the embarrassments they are.

  • But the one considers how and why this happened, the more ridiculous it is.

    I probably shouldn’t criticize your editing skills-glass houses and all of that-but I think this should read:But the more one considers how and why this happened, the more ridiculous it is.

    On the substance of this post, I think you have said it all.

    PS. Perhaps a third cup of coffee is in order.

  • Actually, I’ve always thought of Bill Bennett as one of those swarthy, cave-dwelling types from the movie “Deliverance”—and always refer to him as “Billy Joe Jim Bob Roy Bennett.” So, CB—Bob worked just as well as Bill….

    It seems as though the game-plan for these oafish brutes is to follow the text-plot from the book, “Harrison Bergeron.” Bend the message by handicapping the dissent to that message, if you will. I’m wondering what the “swift-boat” strategy will be for this coming November.

  • The lower the approval numbers the more desperate Rove becomes to take over the media… yet the more he tries to put lipstick on the pig, the more evident his manipulations become to the common man.

  • Anybody catch James Carville dismantle Laura Ingraham yesterday on the Today show? Crooks and Liars has the video, more than anything it shows the battle between reason and reality (Carville) versus talking points and rhetoric (Ingraham).

  • It’s pretty clear the media is scraping the bottom of the barrel with the latest round of hires. John Tierney can’t seem to get enough of promoting polygamy and telling women to learn their proper place — barefoot, pregnant and in the kitchen. J.C. Watts was until very recently doing infomercials. And Ben Domenech will probably prove to be a massive embarrassment to the Washington Post, if his previous pronouncements are any indication.

    If these hires represent the best of conservative thought, then there’s not
    much to worry about. Their views are so out of the mainstream and flat-out wrong it’s hilarious.

  • The corporations (and, unfortunately, also the Democratic party) just don’t get it.

    The “liberal” (truth-seeking, journalistic) bloggers, several overseas news outlets, and Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert and Air America are the only media worth reading/watching/hearing.

    Everything else may make people feel cuddly and warm or hateful and loathsome (just like in church), but they’re not informative in any way. They provide no “balance” to reality … rather, a flight from it.

  • It’s baffling, isn’t it? Especially when you compare it to the
    Clinton years.

    It seems the press, the MSM, will do anything to shore up
    this failed presidency, while for eight years they savaged
    the Clinton administration with unrelenting fury. Every day,
    for eight years, the witch hunts produced headlines and
    lead the evening news stories. And Clinton’s alleged
    misdeeds, save for the groundless rumors about Vince
    Foster, were mere peccadilloes compared to the crimes,
    lies and world shaking fiascos of the Bush administration.

    I cannot understand what has happened to this country.
    It’s just madness. There’s no consistent, underlying,
    unifying force that can explain it.

  • hark,

    Ah, but there IS a unifying force that DOES explain it: money. All of the media consolidation, the other vertical integrations allowed since Reagan in all of our industries (especially in communications and the military industrial complex), has aligned itself perfectly with an (mis)Administration that is willing to bust the budget to stuff the corporatists’ coffers with taxpayer dollars. It is a perfect storm, where the thiefs of the corporate world have fed and cared for the liars that then successfully manipulated the system (K Street Project; electronic voting being hacked, threats to the judiciary, etc.) so that like a virus that overwhelms the body’s immunity systems, the corruption flows like vintage wine without a bottom to the barrel. There IS NO BOTTOM beneath which they cannot and will not sink.

    Face it, America’s goose is cooked, as America — in any way which can be given effect — is no longer “good” as too many evil (or lazy, or disengaged, whatever) persons have corrupted it. Absolute power ultimately does corrupt absolutely. This action by the WaPo is just the latest manifestation.

    Money. The root of all evil. Money, the GOP’s lifeblood, is coalescing more and more in fewer and fewer hands. MONEY explains it, hark, it explains all of it. And the Rethugs have more of it and are willing to use it in unethical, illegal, immoral, and evil ways to maintain what they have and to get more of it.

    It’s a simple formula: Money + Rethugs = Evil Incarnate.

    More simply: Money = GOP = Evil

  • im with analytical liberal. Always follow the money. Same reason we have a war in Iraq and a ridiculous energy policy. Look who benefits? Bush and his chronies are all oilpeeps and Cheney and co are Halliburton related war beneficiaries. It makes perfect sense to want to keep a long war going and never make a dent in oil conumption. Status quo rules. No matter how bad things get for the country, if the money keeps flowing to the top, they will keep the power, and they will do just fine. Always watch the money. What really galls me is that for the dozen odd reasons that the administration has shifted amongst, not one has been the obvious one. The only reason weve ever cared about that part of the country is oil. Why would it be any different now? It really is amazing that with all the history out there about our involvement in the region and the stated reasons by the very same people (Cheney Rummy) that we used to help Iran and Iraq kill each other, no one calls them on this. Absurd. The MSM is almost useless today, in fact, it is starting to become worse than useless it seems now. How can the WaPo even think about hiring a stooge like this? It would be like the NYtimes hiring one of the trolls that hung out here.

  • Great posting! If anyone is puzzled over the fact that polling tends to show “self described liberals” as some 16% of the population, while “self described conservatives” make up some 36% of the population, one need only look at what’s become of the media over the years. As far-right conservative voices are promoted, unabashedly and proudly liberal voices have been hushed and pushed aside. With so much propaganda, misinformation and slander being bandied about, it’s a miracle that even 16% of the population describe themselves as liberals.

    Of course, the fact that significant majorities of the population agree with specific liberal policies merely heightens the disconnect. Americans are far more liberal than the government and the press, but a fantastic PR offensive on the part of conservatives has them voting the other way.

  • Bill Bennett should be reviewing something he knows about, like casinos and slot machines. Now that’s must-see TV.

  • If you want to do something besides complain about this illiterate little goose-stepper wannabee, here’s something good – links to Ben Domenech and his real-screenname posts at RedState.org, with a link to the Washington Post, where you can quote his looniness to them and ask if this is really what they want to be associated with.

    http://yourlogohere.blogspot.com/2006/03/run-stephen-run-ben-it-is-you-via.html

    Have at it. I found a couple of real howlers. Further proof the Romans were right about not letting people vote till they were 30.

  • How ironic is it that a pro-Republican website is called RED America? I can hear McCarthy scream all the way from hell.

  • The evolution of print media: The Flamewar…
    Brady knows that freak shows like “The Jerry Springer Show” & the “700 Club” draw in a large crowds from the “Red States” and this seems to be his attempt to cash in on that demographic while at the same time pulling liberals into a flamewar. It really does seem that the Post wants to stir the pot with this inflammatory new blog. By not allowing comments on the new blog the Post is creating a pressure cooker, which will fuel the fire all the more. Many of the comments at the Post blog imply that the poster will stop reading the WaPo because of this… I think that the opposite of this is true, and no doubt so does Brady. Every time this idiot posts a new article on his blog it will be flooded across the online progressive community. The hits for Red America will be though the roof – not from conservative readers, but from liberals. I think the Post is gambling that this avowed partisan hack will draw its left leaning readership much in the same way decent people stop to gawk at a horrific car accident.
    It’s a win-win for the Post. It will draw more conservatives, and the liberals will be reading it just to tear it up. It’s good for the numbers.
    On the plus side for us progressives is the fact I have not seen mentioned yet – This is a real opportunity for the rabid right to speak to a wider audience, and I am confident that with exposure to it many moderates and independents will run from it, fast.
    Cheers,
    Xero

    Link to comment section at Post Blog regarding Red America:
    http://blog.washingtonpost.com/washpostblog/2006/03/new_blog_red_america.html

  • 2Manchu – James Carville & Mary Matalin are too, too weird for me. When I watch them on Meet the Press, I get a really uncomfortable feeling. If Carville is sincere about his convictions, how does he sleep with someone who participated in the White House Iraq Group? Mary Matalin, along with Condoleeza Rice, Karl Rove, Karen Hughes, Scooter Libby, Andrew Card, Nicholas E. Calio and Stephen Hadley, made up terrible lies to convince Americans to support an invasion and occupation of Iraq.

    Many people have died or been dismaimed and disfigured because of Mary Matalin’s lies. Billions of dollars has been wasted and stolen. That’s our money, not Mary Matalin’s.

    What does Mary Matalin have to do before James Carville throws her sorry ass out on the street? Kill 6 million Jews? Or is James Carville a bullshit artist like every other millionaire pundit in Washington DC?

  • I am sure somebody else has noticed this as well, but does anybody think Ben Domenech should from here on out be referred to as Bendovermuch seeing as he takes it up the but for the repugs!!!!

  • What is it with this right-wing obsession with twenty-somethings these days? Is it that their youthful intensity and lack of cognitive judgment makes them simply irresistible to the old men who pull the strings?

    Or do they simply want to seed the future by putting them into the infrastructure early so they can pillage and plunder for decades to come?

    They’ve done this at NASA, the Intelligence Committee, now the WaPo, and who knows where else. Gives me the creeps, I tell you.

  • mrs panstreppon,
    I’ve wondered why they’re married myself. Great sex? Who knows. She is a total Koolaid slinger, and lives in a bigger bubble than Bush. As for Carville, I just watch him because he fights the wingnuts on their terms. He’s a bullshit artist, but a damn good one.

  • Curmudgeon,
    What they lack is a sense of commitment and sacrifice for our country. They love war, but as long as it’s someone else doing the fighting. Wusses.

    I think we all here have a moral obligation to e-mail WaPo’s new wingnut and ask WHY he isn’t fighitng for this country. Can’t wait to here his answer.

  • Here’s a question, what was Froomkin doing in 1999, or 2000 or even 2003? I don’t know, though I do know what Ben Domenech was doing. He was attending The College of William and Mary and writing for theFlat Hat, the school newspaper. Do you think that Dan was dispensing advice to freshman in 2000? Nah, me neither, but Ben was.

    A search on the school’s web site yielded the following results. Go explore for yourself. Here are a few things you can learn about Ben.
    He was home schooled from the age of five until went to college. Ben was responsible for publicity for the campus Christian group InterVarsity. He finds the chairs at William and Mary uncomfortable-something he mentions in at least two of his essays for the paper. Then there is this revelation,

    I’ve always been something of a political wonk. Maybe it comes from living so close to D.C. or from having a father who’s a lobbyist

    Ben is just another under qualified Republican with the right connections.

  • rege,
    Under qualified Republican with the right connections?

    I give you the future President of the United States, my friends.

  • WaPo is getting a lot of heat for this incredibly imbecile move.

    I don’t know what Jim Brady is smoking along with Deborah Powell, but when the bean-counters at WaPo see the bottom line sinking, they will set these twits straight.

    Either that, or the powers-that-be at WaPo have embarked on a policy change, and have decided to make WaPo the equivalent of the New York Post (is Murdoch throwing money at WaPo?).

    Any road, I am no longer going to read that rag.

  • Comments are closed.