Maybe the wrong White House staffer is leaving

Andy Card may have resigned as WH Chief of Staff today, but according to Insight magazine, he wasn’t the White House staffer Republicans on the Hill are worried about.

An increasing number of House Republican members are urging President Bush to keep Karl Rove out of the driver’s seat in the 2006 congressional campaign.

GOP sources said House members have argued that Mr. Rove, White House deputy chief of staff and powerful Bush political adviser, is hampering what they believe could represent a comeback effort to retain control of Congress. The sources said Mr. Rove has been high-handed and out of touch with the interests of Republican constituents.

“There’s been increasingly greater ego and less substance in this man,” a senior GOP source said. “He’s caused so much needless friction between the president and Congress.”

If accurate, it sounds like Rove’s “Boy Genius” status is limited to the White House, which doesn’t have to worry about running another campaign.

What’s more, nervous congressional Republicans have some ideas about how Bush can improve their chances.

Instead of Mr. Rove’s pro-security agenda, House Republicans have pressed the White House for greater spending allocations to GOP-held congressional districts that face serious Democratic challengers. The sources said constituents have been judging the candidates by their ability to bring government funding and jobs to their districts.

“If we can’t deliver the pork, then we’re out of business,” the senior GOP source said.

That’s the ace up their sleeve? Pork?

On a related note, I feel compelled to add, as I always do, that this is the latest in a series of posts stemming from my fascination with Insight magazine, which is an off-shoot of Sun Myung Moon’s far-right Washington Times.

For those keeping score at home, this is the seventh Insight article in just the past few months that casts the Bush gang in an unflattering light. Two weeks ago, there was an article about Bush effectively delegating his responsibilities. Two weeks before that, it was a piece on Cheney becoming a political liability who will be thrown overboard after the midterm elections. Two weeks before that, it was “the largest crackdown in decades against whistleblowers in government.” The week before, it was an item on Karl Rove threatening to “blacklist” any Republican who goes against the president on warrantless-wiretaps. In January, Insight quoted “administration sources” talking about internal turmoil at the Bush White House. In November, Insight ran an item explaining that Bush has become melancholy and paranoid.

I know I’ve been on this for a while, but this seems like a terrific idea for an expose for anyone with contacts in Moonie circles. We are, after all, talking about the far-right Washington Times’ “sister publication,” which keeps publishing pieces that make Bush look bad.

I’m glad, but I can’t figure it out.

My first thought on the subject: “Pork the GOP”

  • and my first thought was “you mean, they don’t think they’ve had enough pork yet?”

    Given that reports suggest that grover norquist is spending more time with bush, i also expect a big push for “extend the tax cuts.”

  • Dude, don’t rock the boat. If the Moonie magazine accidentally hired some real journalists, we should just sit back and let the good times roll. We don’t want to know *why* this is happening, we only want to rejoice that it *is* happening.

    Of course, seconds after writing that, the political conspericy side of my brian kicked in and I saw another reason.

    Perhaps the Moonies are getting a bit nervous that the other religous right people get to have all the fun, and they’re publishing these stories to put pressure on Rove to throw some meat in thier direction. I haven’t been keeping as close an eye on the Moonies as I’d like to be able to, so I don’t know if they really feel left out, or even if they are distinct from the other religous right groups (though I suspect they are, being a scary cult and all), but this seems as likely a reason as any.

  • The pork thing is part of the GOP strategy (which Ken Mehlman and others have talked about), which is to localize the elections instead of nationalizing them. Rove wanted to nationalize the midterms around the national-security issue, even though the ongoing disaster in Iraq makes it clear how out-of-touch that is as an idea. Basically Rove thinks it’s still 2004 and you can still win by promising to “win” in Iraq.

    Interestingly, in 2002 the situation was reversed: I looked at Atrios’s post-mortem from November 2002 and he complained that the Democrats were afraid of nationalizing the elections while the Republicans made every effort to make the midterms a referendum on Bush and the Republican Party. It’s a welcome sign that it’s now the Republicans who are trying to run exclusively on local issues, because that’s usually the strategy of a) desperation and b) losing. Democrats learned that four years ago.

  • From this morning CB post “… managing government spending? Democrats 46%, Republicans 31%” Americans believe the GOP is fiscally irresponsible. So they are going to counter this by trying to by off “real” ficsal conservative votes in their districts with big-time federal dollars. Hmmmmm….interesting idea. One more reason to fire Rove. If this guy gets his way the GOP won’t be able to get elected dog catcher.

  • Odd, M.A., your 2002 experience is the exact opposite of mine. Here, we had a vulnerable R incumbent, a good D challenger. The national party rolled in and pushed the campaign to use mainly canned commercials on health care, Medicare, and Social Security. This made some sense – those were, in theory, big issues in a rural state with an older population. But when they didn’t catch on (some were just bad commercials) there was no plan B. Part of why they didn’t catch on is they weren’t localized or targeted to the particular persons in this race. And the incumbent R was never aggressively attacked on some votes that were not bad nationally but were very troubling locally. I actually thought had the D challenger run/been allowed to run a more localized race, he would have won. Instead we lost about 6 points.

  • When it gets right down to the bottom of the Republicanite spittoon, I suspect that Rove is the scummiest glob of the lot. If the rest of the Republicanite party is starting to recognize that, I’m just as happy to welcome them back into the human family.

  • The, “‘If we can’t deliver the pork, then we’re out of business,’ the senior GOP source said,” quote really blows my mind.

    What “senior GOP source” in their right mind would say something like that so bluntly? What politician in general would admit to that?

    I’m going to go out on a limb & say they’re making this one up.

    This is like a freakin’ murder mystery – someone at Insight is not only out to tarnish this administration, but with this quote, the GOP in general. At first, I thought they were just trying to play up bush as “embattled,” but they obviously have a malicious intent with these articles.

    What is going on over there?

  • There was a little noticed — as yet — story by TWN and Raw News that Rove and the VP’s office have been at war since Rove started to put out feelers about ditching Cheney prior to ’04. Now with Rove feeding 250 pages of email about Libby to Fitzgerald, things have gotten considerably hotter. It would make sense that Insight may be closer to the VP than to Bush’s inner circle, and it may be that this is aimed at them…any thoughts?

  • There is an ad on this page asking Should Rove Resign?

    I wonder if his thoughts on this go “You first Dick (Cheney)”.

  • The Moonies are just covering their bets, in case the Bush administration implodes.

  • So, whatever happened to Rove’s ballyhooed plan for a “30-year GOP majority”? Where, really, are Karl’s loyalties/priorities?

    I’m genuinely curious about this.

    (As opposed to whatever happened to Rove’s being in charge of post-Katrina reparations, which was just a transparent lie; although I’d like to see reporters follow up on that as well.)

  • Greaters spending allocations?? Another piece of evidence to show that the GOP has thrown it (supposed) fiscal conservativeness on bonfire…..

    What those people that want Rover out don’t understand is that Bush needs Rover. If they think the pResidents performance is bad now, they should see what would happen without Rover.

  • That’s the ace up their sleeve? Pork?

    You scoff. But against all expectations, Sen. Kit Bond from Missouri has been re-elected repeatedly based solely on his ability to bring home the bacon. In fact, the only time he’s in the state is when he’s carrying a fat check back from Washington. There really is no other explanation for it.

  • Sun Myung Moon is all about money. He always has been all about money, and he shall continue to be all about money. He’s simply realizing that there’s money to be made—lots and lots of money to be made—by playing both sides of the journalistic field. He’s bought himself an audience on the right side of the aisle, and now he’s working to bring in the left side of the aisle as another audience. It’ll be extremely funny when the lights come back up, and the two sides find out they’re sitting next to each other ((kind of like “boy, girl, boy, girl,” but in this case it’s “lib, con, lib, con”) at the same banquet table. Or should i say: They’ve been served up “ON” the same banquet table?

    I imagine there’s a “real” reason for Andy to bail out. Maybe he couldn’t stomach the Rove-ish-ness of it all any more. Maybe he just wanted to try new things; go in a different direction sort of thing and all that. But, I’ll wager, someone got worried that Card wouldn’t keep playing along with all the mess that’s coming down the pipeline. That would be so typical of today’s White House—protect the fox by putting the chicken outside the coop fence….

  • I thought the economy was supposed to create jobs, and since it’s allegedly doing just swell, what do these politicians have to be fretting about?

  • The real reason Sun Myung Moon is writing negative articles about
    Bush is that Moon thinks he’s God and doesn’t appreciate Bush
    who thinks HE is God. You can only have one God so one of them has
    to go.
    As for Rove, without Karl Rove there is no “George W. Bush.”
    Rove invented him and is the puppet master that keeps the act going.
    No Rove= No Bush.
    You think things are screwed up now? Wait till Rove leaves.
    Then you had better pray to the real God to get us out of the mess
    that is going to follow.
    Do you really think that George W. Bush, who can’t even get three
    words out of his mouth without sounding like a complete idiot,
    is capable of governing by himself? Not a chance.
    Still, it is nice to see that Rasputin has made enemies with the
    rest of the GOP leadership.
    With all the turmoil this could create it will leave the Republicans
    weak and divided and unprepared for the Fall elections.
    Wouldn’t it be nice to see the GOP Masters of the Universe having
    to answer questions before a Democratic-run Congress and have
    to give real answers? Now that will be worth seeing.

  • So Rove thinks that there will be a Republican majority for at least 30 years. I also remember another party talking about being in power for 1,000 years. It was called the third reich and their shtick lasted 12. Let’s make this group’s even shorter.

  • You make the mistake of thinking Moon has ever been on the right’s side. He has always used them.

    Moon’s media is NOT on the right’s side. It is only on Moon’s side — most who work for him don’t know or understand how they are tools. Moon has played the right for chumps. They fell for his “anti-communist” BS when in fact he doesn’t like democracy either; he wants his form of theocracy which he calls “Godism”.

    UPI was bought to give him a name and clout around the world. Always remember the articles written in it are often written for worldwide consumption. Moon intends for Korea to eventually be #1 and his sovereign nation, he doesn’t give a hooey about the USA or wingnuts, they/we are his toys to reach the world.

    Remember when Moon was crowned at the Dirksen Building in March 2004? Shortly after that there were stories being written that the ‘owners’ and people like Pruden at the Washington Times were infighting for control of the paper. What a crock of BS. That was just fiction to make the people who have been trained by the Washington Times the last 20 years to think that it is somehow “independent” of Moon’s plans for the planet was real…which is utter nonsense.

    The paper was designed to prop up hard right politics while Moon funded the fundies like Falwell, LaHaye, Viguerie and created fronts like the American Freedom Coalition to gather the “Christian” right together for political power. Moon says it is job as Messiah to ‘restore” Christianity to control America and he outspent Scaife doing just that. Moon is the conservative movement’s savior, literally, they do not control our nation without his ‘efforts’ the last 25 years.

    With an editor like Pruden, Moon doesn’t have to tell the WT what to write anyway. He is on auto pilot moving the nation right while Moon moved elsewhere to empower the theocrats.

    As far as Insight is concerned they are still pissed at Bush and the conservatives because they have never openly thanked Moon for being their savior. They had an editorial say as much a couple years ago…In the long run Moon is happy if we tear ourselves apart. He wants KOREA to be number one, that has always been his vision. He wants America to infight and act just like it is. He wants to be the night in shining armour to save the planet, if the world hate America it just makes him look more like the only answer…..

    scroll down here for an interview with Arnaud, he says Bush is an idiot when it comes to foreign affairs. He acts like he didn’t spend 20 years moving the nation right and making the nation right for freak like Bush to be elected. These are soulless beings.

    http://www.iifwp.org/publications/vopeace/

    Like all on the right, before 2008 they know they have to act like Bush isn’t a perfect theofascist so they can act like the next freak the republicans put up is new and improved.

    check these out
    http://www.cellwhitman.blogspot.com/

    pay close attention to the bottom couple quote boxes here:
    http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/12/15/221015/62

  • Comments are closed.