Just a couple of weeks ago, retired Army Major General Paul D. [tag]Eaton[/tag], the military official in charge of training the Iraqi military from 2003 to 2004, said Defense Secretary Donald [tag]Rumsfeld[/tag] has created “a climate of groupthink” that has led him to “put the Pentagon at the mercy of his ego.” He insisted that Rumsfeld “must step down.”
It seems to be a common sentiment among those with stars on their shoulder.
The three-star Marine Corps general who was the military’s top operations officer before the invasion of Iraq expressed regret, in an essay published Sunday, that he did not more energetically question those who had ordered the nation to war. He also urged active-duty officers to speak out now if they had doubts about the war.
Lt. Gen. Gregory [tag]Newbold[/tag], who retired in late 2002, also called for replacing Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and “many others unwilling to fundamentally change their approach.” He is the third retired senior officer in recent weeks to demand that Mr. Rumsfeld step down.
In the essay, in this week’s issue of Time magazine, General Newbold wrote, “I now regret that I did not more openly challenge those who were determined to invade a country whose actions were peripheral to the real threat — [tag]Al Qaeda[/tag].”
The decision to invade Iraq, he wrote, “was done with a casualness and swagger that are the special province of those who have never had to execute these missions — or bury the results.”
Newbold added that he believed advocates for the war were “zealots,” whose rationale “made no sense.”
For those counting at home, that makes three retired generals — Eaton, Newbold, and former Central Command leader Gen. Anthony [tag]Zinni[/tag] — who have called for Rumsfeld’s resignation. More officers would no doubt step up, if they weren’t still on active duty.
Though some active-duty officers will say in private that they disagree with Mr. Rumsfeld’s handling of Iraq, none have spoken out publicly. They attribute their silence to respect for civilian control of the military, as set in the Constitution — but some also say they know it would be professional suicide to speak up.
How about a vote of “no confidence”?