Cheney’s ‘vice squad’

If you haven’t already, be sure to check out[tag] Robert Dreyfuss[/tag]’ stunning American Prospect story on Dick [tag]Cheney[/tag]’s hyper-secretive, strikingly powerful White House operation. Speculation about how Cheney controls an insular group of ideologues is, if anything, understating the case. (via Kevin Drum)

Notoriously opaque, the Office of the [tag]Vice President[/tag] ([tag]OVP[/tag]) is very difficult for journalists to penetrate. But a Prospect investigation shows that the key to Cheney’s influence lies with the corps of hard-line acolytes he assembled in 2001. They serve not only as his eyes and ears, monitoring a federal bureaucracy that resists many of Cheney’s pet initiatives, but sometimes serve as his fists, too, when the man from Wyoming feels that the passive-aggressive bureaucrats need bullying. Like disciplined Bolsheviks slicing through a fractious opposition, Cheney’s team operates with a single-minded, ideological focus on the exercise of American military power, a belief in the untrammeled power of the presidency, and a fierce penchant for secrecy. […]

At the high-water mark of neoconservative power, when coalition forces invaded Iraq in March 2003, the vice president’s office was the command center for a web of like-minded officials in the [tag]White House[/tag], the Pentagon, the State Department, and other agencies, often described by former officials as “Dick Cheney’s spies.” Now, thanks to a misguided war and a bungled occupation, along with a string of foreign-policy failures that have alienated U.S. allies and triggered a wave of anti-American feeling around the globe, the numbers and influence of those Cheneyites outside the office have receded. No longer quite so commanding, the office seems more like a bunker for neoconservatives and their fellow travelers in the administration. Yet if only because of Dick Cheney’s Rasputin-like hold over the president, his office remains a formidable power indeed.

Despite having gotten every major policy question wrong since Bush took office in 2001, Cheney’s office manages an uncomfortable level of control — which is executed in secret and with such independence that “Cheney’s spies” help kill major initiatives by the State Department and the NSC whenever they think they should.

What’s more, Dreyfuss explained that Cheney assembled a “shadow NSC,” filled with loyalists, ideologues, and think-tank partisans, which operates independently — from everyone.

According to Wilkerson, Cheney’s office and the NSC were completely separate on foreign policy. Cheney, says Wilkerson, “set up a staff that knew what the statutory NSC was doing, but the NSC statutory staff didn’t know what his staff was doing. The vice president’s staff could read the statutory NSC’s e-mail, but the NSC couldn’t read their e-mail. So, once someone on the statutory NSC figured it out, they used various work-arounds. Like, for example, they would walk to someone’s office, rather than send an e-mail, if what they were going to talk about they didn’t want to reveal to the vice president’s very powerful staff.” But that was difficult because of Cheney “spies” within the bureaucracy, including people like John Bolton at the State Department, Robert Joseph at the NSC, certain staffers at WINPAC (the arms control shop at CIA), and various Pentagon officials, he adds.

And how does [tag]Bush[/tag] figure into all of this? One White House insider told Dreyfuss that the president isn’t, shall we say, well informed.

“The president is given only the most basic notions about the Korea issue. They tell him, ‘Above South Korea is a country called North Korea. It is an evil regime.’ … So that translates into a presidential decision: Why enter into any agreement with an evil regime?”

A power-hungry Vice President who operates in [tag]secret[/tag] with a small army of ideologues and a President who is lectured to like a child. It’s quite a White House.

Bush is out of the loop again. This equals incompetence.

Dangerous Incompetence in a time of war.

  • CB,

    Thanks for the link. The Prospect article is about the best explanation I have ever read of just how the Neo-Cons think and act to drag America to its impending doom.

  • Not surprised by the circled wagons mentality of the OVP, not surprised by the pResidents cluelessness. Cheney was put on the ticket precisely because Bush was clueless in most areas, most especially in foreign policy/defense, and Cheney was supposed to take the lead. Cheney was put on the ticket to make those voters that were uncomfortable about Bush because of his lack of foreign policy/defnese experience more comfortable. What we have going today is the result. What most didn’t understand is that Cheney was always secretive and the whole circle the wagons mentality that has developed because of 9/11, Plame, Iraq, etc has only made that worse.

  • Well, there are two possible bright spots.

    One, Bush seems to take more occasions to disdain Cheney, and by implication, his staff. Maybe Rice and a few other individuals with backbones can start to resist the insanity coming out of the OVP.

    Two, should Bush blow off Cheney after the November elections, Josh Bolton can see to it that the whole OVP goes and gets no other Executive branch jobs.

    Both may be wistful thinking, but it seems the best we have.

    I might offer the possibility that it was the OVP that leaked the idea of nuking Iran, and Bush may be really annoyed with them for making him comment on the ‘non’-plans for Iran.

  • It’s safe to say the idea of nuking Iran came from Cheney’s office. For all the talk of his “waning” influence, no one in the White House publicly disavows the batshit insane policy of using a nuclear weapon in a preemptive strike. When it comes down to it, Bush, who is completely divorced from reality, will continue to rely heavily on Cheney’s “judgment” on all sorts of matters.

    Here’s the thing that caught my attention: “He believes that in time of war, there is total authority for the president to waive any rules to carry out his objectives,” is how Congresswoman Jane Harman, the intelligence committee’s ranking Democrat, described Addington to The Washington Post. “Those views have extremely dangerous implications.”

    Bush has already assumed unprecedented executive powers. But what’s to stop Bush and Cheney from ignoring a possible Democratic majority in Congress? Would either step down if they were impeached?

  • So how would a shadow NSC spying on the NSC (deliciously ironic) and spies on every Executive Branch department staff influence a National Intelligence Estimate? Is it possible that Cheney misled W into war? Is it possible that Libby’s statement that W declassified Plame’s identity and authorized the leak was designed to take the pressure off Cheney? Is W a dupe?

    I keep going back and forth on this. Is Cheney the evil or is Bush the evil? Who would I rather see go down? Any chance this story will wind its way into the MSM and maybe even a Congressional Committee?

  • Wan’t Cheney supposed to assemble some sort of “shadow government” after 9/11? The argument back then was that someone needed to run things in the event elected Washington was brought down by an attack. The story didn’t last long (surprise!) but that doesn’t mean Bushco didn’t move forward anyway. Then there’s Cheney and his undisclosed locations. Anyone have any info or links on this?

  • Quick query: If the Dems retake both Houses of Congress this year, and Bush/Cheney are BOTH dumped via impeachment in early 2007, who’s “third-in-command?” I’m currently think it’s the Speaker of the House of Representatives that would, by default, become President…correct?

  • Hi Steve.

    Yep, Speaker of the House, who would be a Democrat by then. Which would certainly make the Democrats organization of the House in 2007 the most important election of the year. Pelosi as the first woman President 🙂

  • ” Dick Cheney’s Rasputin-like hold over the president”

    Nice comparison! Like Rasputin, Cheney isn’t going to go down easy…. with that mystic dark hypnotic sneer that steals the will of weaker men (especially from Texas).

  • To answer MNProgressive…

    The evil is definitely Cheney. He and his neo-con allies devised their power grab prior to the 2000 elections. Bush is simply a figurehead that they needed because 1) as an evangelical he would be able to ‘get out the vote’ and 2) Cheney is an ugly, unlikeable miscreant.

    I have been espousing that Cheney has been our shadow president all along. He’s the one calling the shots, detailing policies both foreign and domestic. He’s the one who held the secret energy policy meetings. He’s the one who orchestrated the attack on Iraq (with Rummy and Wolfy, who were looking to ‘finish the job’ since Bush I decided not to roll into Baghdad).
    Cheney is the one appearing on Rush and Lehrer and Fox positioning the admin’s spin, because W can’t be trusted to do it.

    IMPEACH CHENEY

  • All of this has been painfully obvious to any
    observant, thinking person for at least three
    years. It’s gratifying, though, to see confirmation
    of our suspicions.

    That this president is nothing but an assemblage
    of rags dangling from stings manipulated by the
    necon cabal headed by Cheney is absolutely
    chilling and terrifying. And this fool in the White
    House doesn’t even know how he’s been a
    mere prop, chosen solely for his “electability,”
    making the situation all the more ghastly and
    surreal. Bush really believes he’s president.
    What in God’s name would happen if Cheney
    and his crowd suddenly resigned?

    Our only hope: November 2006. Go for it!
    Let’s put our time and efforts into that.

  • Lance charts a pretty good (if difficult) course: take the House and Senate this Fall, impeach Bush/Cheney immediately (I think the country, aside from the knuckle-draggers, would heave a sigh of relief), and welcome House Speaker Nancy Pelosi as our first female President.

    I’d love to see the carving job President Pelosi would do on the GOP holdovers in the executive branch (and on the lazy self-satisfied Democrats in Congress). She’s been held back for years, by House decorum and minority status, not to mention corporate control of the media, but she got her training in San Francisco’s Phil Burton machine and she knows how to play dirty.

  • The more we know about this administration, the more Kremlin-like it appears. Cheyney plays the role of the head of the Communist Party, while Bush is the outward-facing and somewhat titular Premier. Cheyney has his “political commissars” he sends out to ensure and compel loyalty. And all this done with an obsession to secrecy and loyalty to the party.

    Who was it won the Cold War, again?

  • “Who was it won the Cold War, again?” – shargash

    There is a truism discovered from the Cold War.

    To fight the cold war, the Soviets became more like us.
    To fight them back, we became more like the Soviets.

  • “To fight the cold war, the Soviets became more like us.
    To fight them back, we became more like the Soviets.”

    I re-read that and got the worst chill down my spine.

    Imagine fifty years from now, when some blogger writes:

    “To fight the Wahabist Jihadists, America became more like them.”

    And to think, it didn’t even take us a year (torture, kidnappings, wiretapping, religious extremism, etc.)

  • Even as one who “knew” that Cheney was calling the shots, I found this article both scary and infuriating.

    Three observations:

    – It’s not “Darth Cheney”, it’s “Emperor Cheney”.

    – So much for “transparency” in government (totally lacking in this admin, I know, I know).

    – Excuse me, but our tax dollars pay the VP and his staff. They are public employees, OUR EMPLOYEES. I hope they all rot in jail when their crimes are exposed. (Go Fitz!)

  • Comments are closed.