Can the 20s be far behind?

Oh the indignity. The [tag]Bush[/tag] gang not only has to endure a new [tag]poll[/tag] pegging the president’s approval ratings at a stunning 33%, but they’re also in a position in which they can’t bash the news outlet that produced the poll — [tag]Fox News[/tag].

President Bush’s job [tag]approval rating[/tag] slipped this week and stands at a new low of 33 percent approve, down from 36 percent two weeks ago and 39 percent in mid-March. A year ago this time, 47 percent approved and two years ago 50 percent approved (April 2004).

Approval among [tag]Republicans[/tag] is below 70 percent for the first time of Bush’s presidency. Two-thirds (66 percent) approve of Bush’s job performance today, down almost 20 percentage points from this time last year when 84 percent of Republicans approved. Among Democrats, 11 percent approve today, while 14 percent approved last April.

“It seems clear that many Republicans, while they may still like and support [tag]George Bush[/tag], are growing uneasy with what may happen to their candidates — and the policies they support — in the November elections,” comments Opinion Dynamics Chairman John Gorman.

“This unease about the direction of the party is now showing up as an erosion of the near unanimous support Bush has enjoyed among the Republican rank-and-file for the last six years.”

Asked specifically why they disapprove of the president, 48% noted the war in Iraq as the top reason, 24% said Bush is doing a bad job in general, 22% disagree with him on the issues, 17% noted the economy, and 11% said they just don’t like him personally.

Following up on the Fox News poll, [tag]Paul Krugman[/tag] said today that there’s “a great revulsion” among the electorate — and it’s overdue.

“I have a vision — maybe just a hope — of a [tag]great revulsion[/tag]: a moment in which the American people look at what is happening, realize how their good will and patriotism have been abused, and put a stop to this drive to destroy much of what is best in our country.”

I wrote those words three years ago in the introduction to my column collection, “The Great Unraveling.” It seemed a remote prospect at the time: Baghdad had just fallen to U.S. troops, and President Bush had a 70 percent approval rating.

Now the great revulsion has arrived. The latest Fox News poll puts Mr. Bush’s approval at only 33 percent. According to the polling firm Survey USA, there are only four states in which significantly more people approve of Mr. Bush’s performance than disapprove: Utah, Idaho, Wyoming and Nebraska. If we define red states as states where the public supports Mr. Bush, Red America now has a smaller population than New York City.

The proximate causes of Mr. Bush’s plunge in the polls are familiar: the heck of a job he did responding to Katrina, the prescription drug debacle and, above all, the quagmire in Iraq.

But focusing too much on these proximate causes makes Mr. Bush’s political fall from grace seem like an accident, or the result of specific missteps. That gets things backward. In fact, Mr. Bush’s temporarily sky-high approval ratings were the aberration; the public never supported his real policy agenda.

That’s true, and it also points to the inherent difficulties of a “comeback.” At 33%, Bush can’t bolster his public support by touting policy prescriptions that he believes in (Social Security privatization anyone?). He’s simply stuck — low support, unpopular agenda, disastrous war.

Maybe Bush and his allies can “fear and smear” their way through one more election cycle, maybe not. But it’s hard to see how the president personally recovers without a drastic change of direction and priorities.

Bush said he intended to spend his political capital, and now he’s politically bankrupt with 1000 days left in office. Like a retiree who has outlived his nestegg, Bush will be eating political catfood because his political budgeting skills matched his financial budgeting abilities. The guy just cant think ahead.

  • CB, I have great confidence, despite all the naysayers, in Mr. Bush’s abilities to move his poll numbers. No matter what anyone says, I’m quite certain he’ll be able to see his way clear to getting his popularity (at the very least) into the 20’s.

    Since Atrios has this pony thing going for sub-40 Bush polls, what do we do when he goes below 30%? Unicorns? Stuffed wombats? Corpse Bride dolls?

  • Eating political catfood. That is really funny!

    The more important question is what are all these people who disapprove going to do about it? If they do not like the man, his policies, his corrupt cronies, etc. then what happens? Do they embrace a Democratic Congress in November? Do they vote for their Republikan Representative and hope everyone else boots theirs out?

    I have a feeling that if Dems win in November the last 800 days of W’s reign will be very interesting. Remember Republikans need an enemy to strike fear in their supporters. A tax and spend Dem congress might fill that void nicely. These guys may be scummy ideologues but they are not stupid…

  • Krugman concludes: “In retrospect, then, the 2004 election looks like the high-water mark of a conservative tide that is now receding.”

    Receding? Hell, we can’t be satisfied until a “tsunami of change” washes the Bush-Rove-Delay-Santorum party far into the backwater of American politics and society.

  • One can only wonder when the corporate news outlets will realize that the viewers who pay the bills hate Bush? Once that gets through their addled brains, they’ll stop listening to the Republican “liberal bias” attacks and really lay into the Bushies. That will drive those numbers done to about the 8% of the population living in religious compounds waiting for the second coming!!

  • slip kid:

    I would say that the Republican high water mark can still be plainly seen on the sides of the buildings in New Orleans.

    kali:

    “Political cat food” — brilliant!

  • I just hope the American public understands that Mr. Bush did not do this all on his own–there are about 290 enablers and co-conspirators sitting in the House and Senate. This election cycle their voting records should be plastered on their shirts/jackets/skin, whatever, like a big scarlet “A”.

  • I’ll go Krugman one better (yeah, I know, how presumptuous of me!), and claim that the conservative tide — along with the Neocons and the Rethugs who have foisted it upon us– are now swirling like the filthy waste they are in a well-used toilet bowl. When they ARE flushed into the septic tank of failed history — and they will be — it won’t be a moment too soon!

    On the other hand, I do FULLY expect a 9/11 part 2 incident come no later than this September, OR an attack on Iran (with the claim that the AUMF in October 2002 gives the Royal Buffoon the authority to do so without further action from Congress being required). NOTHING should be ruled out of the realm of possibility — or expectations — for these “lying murderous bastards” (to quote AAR’s Mike Malloy).

    kali, I agree that “Bush will be eating political catfood” is brilliant, and I will add it to my daily prayers for God to be merciful to our country and the world!!

  • This is an interesting little fix that Bush is in. He’s stuck. A person less egotistical than he is will realize that there’s no further good he can do, and resign in favor of someone who can rally the party. But Bush probably won’t resign because it would be a horrible blow to his pride. Meaning that if he does anything in the remaining years of his presidency at all, it will have to be through the exercise of raw power rather than leadership.

    Another thought–this super-low poll numbers can actually be bad for America. He is now free to use his self-given presidential power any way he likes without fear of negative opinion. Like attacking Iran. So what if he offends anybody by doing so–everybody hates him anyway! He has nothing to lose.

    Kali and yam–damn. That’s all I can say. I’m definitely going to have to remember those lines.

  • Sorry to post so soon again, but I just have to add to bubba’s comment:

    There are an awful lot of Dems in the House and the Senate that are just as complicit as all of those who wear the Rethug label. For example, we have Jomentum (on just about all of the major things that are wrong with BushCo); all the Dems on the 2001 tax cuts; those who voted for and refuse to now denounce the Iraq debacle; those who voted for the bankruptcy bill and the class action lawsuit changes; or the confirmation of Condo Rice for SoS, Abu Gonzo for AG, and Alito for SCOTUS; and lots, lots more that have soiled and killed America and the world and its people in so many disgusting and decidedly UN-Christian ways.

    This may not be the time to purge these bastards from our ranks (because taking back the Congress is the first necessary step to stopping the insanity and therefore of much higher CURRENT priority), but the DLC and all those DINOs and Rethug-Lites masquerading as Democrats MUST eventually be taken out. That necessary step must, unfortunately, await another day.

  • A.L., agreed, with the possible exception of the 2001 tax cut (if that was the first one). Some bipartisanship at the beginning of a new administration, one that did run at least partially on such things as at least one round of tax cuts, should not be a reason to tar those who supported that cut, regardless of whether one supports or opposes such cuts (and I am not defending them, I was against them). The bigger issue is that the Dems got little to nothing in return for such support and then once they saw exactly how this Sadministration (and GOP Congress) operated, they should have learned their lesson–their is no compromise with or bipartisanship in, this Sadministration . Many, fools that they are, did not.

  • Mr. Flibble,

    The problem with your conclusion that W will flail his Presidential power like a blind drunk in a bar fight is that if the people, media, and everyone else opposes W we do have the Constitution to fall back on. The only reason W can do as he pleases is that nobody is stopping him. It is unlikely but overturning vetoes, opening investigations, and impeachment are avenues of control on W. I hate to be optimistic (it is not in my nature) but the best resolution to a situation where an Executive over-extends his power is to have Congress and the voters neuter him. In this case I vote for a tree stump and meat cleaver as opposed to chemical castration but I can live with either.

  • To follow onto MNP, I really do think that the best route GOP Congressfelons can take to bolster their chances would be to support censure of Bush/impeachment investigtion. Not gonna happen, though.

  • I too am a little worried about a President “Nothing Left To Lose” Bush.

    Frankly, even if Bush isn’t popular he knows Americans tend to be pretty complacent much of the time, we’re not much for radical, collective public action. If he tried to bomb Iran what would The People do?

  • My concern is that Bush’s disapproval is entirely
    passive, and may result in no changes at all.
    There are no anti-war movements, anti-Bush
    movements, pro Democratic movements that one
    might expect from such horrible poll numbers.
    And the Democrats seem intent upon running
    a stealth campaign. The reaction to the worst
    administration in history is showing up only
    in media polls. Outside of those, a visitor from
    outer space would conclude everything in America
    is proceeding along hunky-dory and everyone is
    happy, watching American Idol and getting fat.
    Worse, that could quite possibly be true. The
    attitude seems to be: “Oh yeah, now that you’ve
    asked, Bush isn’t very good, now back to
    my Nascar races,” and that’s the last this polled
    American will even think about the matter.

    Remember, in the last poll only 33% of the
    American people thought Bush should be
    impeached, and less than half, censured.
    Dissatisfaction with Bush is passive, and that
    does not bode well. And it’s the Dems fault
    for not rallying the people. And they may very
    well eat it in November.

  • Zoe is right. I think the risk of Bush going for broke is pretty big. He’s a gambler, and he knows what happened to his numbers when he invaded Iraq. They went up, for NO REASON other than that the American people want to support the president in times of war. And I do not trust our press to ask the tough questions when more “intelligence” is trotted out against Iran.

  • MNProgressive,
    I agree that there are those constitutional remedies, but I disagree that anyone will be inclined to use them. Ever. And I suspect the Democratic leadership is having to work hard to disguise its drooling at the prospect of taking over the management of the quite remunerative political machine the Republicans created. And who will stop them? The GOP is probably going to have to be tube-fed and on a breathing machine for a few years.

    Or, put differently, I’ve seen hardly any evidence that anyone–Democrats included–are committed to restoring integrity to the federal government. In fact, I’ve seen quite the opposite. How many Dems treated Feingold’s censure resolution like it was dripping with leprosy? We have to set aside the rhetoric (lame as it has been so far) and observe the deeds. And what I see is not encouraging.

  • Can I just ask those 11% of Democrats that approve of the job he is doing – What the hell are you thinking/smoking?

  • My guess is that the majority of the people polled by Fox were more concerned about the price of gas than anything else. Saw a post elsewhere that had comments from a call-in radio show…some guy who drives 128 mile round-trip to work every day, concerned about the rising cost of gas, asked what George is going to do about it. The oil companies alone could bring up Bush’s numbers by reducing their profits.

  • Head’s up. There’s a good article by John Dean that addresses this topic very well. Find Law. All I have time to say is scary, and meow.

  • I think the plan was to distract the nation with arguments about immigration reform, and that didn’t work out very well.

    PessimisticClown has it right, I think, with the gas prices. And, he’s right again with the fact that, should Bush make a show of petitioning Big Oil to dig deep and help the common man he can raise his approval ratings quickly.

    Of course, they’re hiking the price before the sale, though, but I wouldn’t be suprised to see some drops in the fall, a few cents here and there.

  • “A person less egotistical than he is will realize that there’s no further good he can do, and resign in favor of someone who can rally the party.” _ Mr. Flibble

    The problem is not so much his ego as the fact that the Republicanites are not really ‘his’ party. He is the leader of the Texas Mafia, and they are not going to give up control if they can help it.

  • Here’s my question: Does Bush nuke Iran before or after his approval rating drops into the 20s?

  • I’m betting he can break the record going low, whatever it is.

    What’s the line in Vegas on this anyway?

  • Comments are closed.