Bush’s faith, by his own admission, shapes his foreign policy

[tag]Kevin Phillips[/tag] recently published a new book, “American Theocracy,” based in part on the idea that [tag]George W. Bush[/tag] is heading “the first religious party in U.S. history,” basing life-and-death policy decisions on the power of “the tens of millions of true believers viewing events through a Left Behind perspective.”

If [tag]Bush[/tag] hopes to disprove Phillips’ thesis, this probably wasn’t the way to do it.

Speaking to a business group in Irvine, Ca.,… Bush also explained, in unusually stark terms, how his belief in [tag]God[/tag] [tag]influences[/tag] his [tag]foreign policy[/tag].

“I base a lot of my foreign policy decisions on some things that I think are true,” he said. “One, I believe there’s an Almighty. And, secondly, I believe one of the great gifts of the Almighty is the desire in everybody’s soul, regardless of what you look like or where you live, to be free. I believe liberty is universal. I believe people want to be free. And I know that democracies do not war with each other.”

(The official transcript is here, and C&L’s video is here.)

Now, it’s possible that Bush was just emphasizing his belief that freedom is a universal concept, which he’s said before. In this context, the remarks were more in line with a Declaration of Independence-style “endowed by their [tag]creator[/tag]” kind of thinking.

But the key part of the quote was Bush’s claim that he’s basing his “foreign policy decisions” on his religious beliefs. That, in a word, is scary. Anyone, whether they’re president of not, who believes their policy decisions are based on God’s wishes, acts with dangerous certainty. They can not be dissuaded or discouraged because, in their mind, God “told” them what to do. Indeed, critics and opponents are not only viewed as incorrect, they’re seen as heretics.

This also, unfortunately, dovetails with recent reporting from [tag]Seymour Hersh[/tag].

Current and former military and intelligence officials have told me that the President remains convinced that it is his personal mission to bring democracy to Iraq, and that he is impervious to political pressure, even from fellow Republicans. They also say that he disparages any information that conflicts with his view of how the war is proceeding.

Bush’s closest advisers have long been aware of the religious nature of his policy commitments. In recent interviews, one former senior official, who served in Bush’s first term, spoke extensively about the connection between the President’s religious faith and his view of the war in Iraq. After the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the former official said, he was told that Bush felt that “God put me here” to deal with the war on terror. The President’s belief was fortified by the Republican sweep in the 2002 congressional elections; Bush saw the victory as a purposeful message from God that “he’s the man,” the former official said. Publicly, Bush depicted his reelection as a referendum on the war; privately, he spoke of it as another manifestation of [tag]divine[/tag] purpose.

Bush’s policies have been frightening enough; the idea that he believes he’s on some kind of religious crusade is simply breathtaking.

Kind of reminds me of Jake and Elwood Blues “mission from God”. Roughly as incompetent and boldly more dangerous.

If George starts sporting black Ray-Bans and doing back-flips we’re doomed.

  • The fundamental problem with this is that Bush also believes the Christian God is the one true God. It is not about freedom. If it were about freedom then Iran would be an example of Middle East Freedom to be held up high. The problem is that they are not Christian Fundies.

    The root cause of the problem is that Bush is an untreated alcoholic who holds onto external truths to deal with internal problems. All the concerns voiced during the 2000 campaign about incompetence and lack of intellectual curiosity have been proven true.

    Sadly, I do not find this breathtaking. I do not even find it surprising. The breathtaking part is that every American is not deeply disturbed by this.

  • Only one word comes to mind. Insanity. I mean it literally. Certifiably insane. Let’s pad the walls of the oval office, cut the phone lines, and seal the door.

  • My jihad vs is holier than your jihad. Bush sounds like Bin Laden.

    Bush IS right about one thing. I do want to be free. Free of tyrrany from a theocratic incompetent bungler who covers up his greed and corruption with a flag and a cross. Liberty from Bush!

  • Boy you guys seem to be reading more into this than it deserves.

    All Bush is saying is that people around the world want and deserve liberty and freedom because God made them with the desire for it.

    The joke is the claim that he bases his foreign policy on this belief. His embrace of Putin, Hu and other autocrats proves this to be untrue.

    I don’t think of Bush as insane. Damaged by years of alcohol and drug use, yes. And horribly self-deceiving. But not frothing insane. That’s Dick Cheney 😉

  • I believe people want to be free. And I know that democracies do not war with each other.”

    So what does that make us? My money’s on dictatorship.

  • “And I know that democracies do not war with each other.” – George W

    Strangely, Mexico was a democracy when we went to war with it in 1848. Which means I suppose that the U.S. of A. was not one????

    Ammusingly, the Mexicans gave the presidency of Mexico BACK to Santa Anna (the dictator during the Texan War of Independence) to fight the Americans, which they did for quite a while, forcing the U.S. forces to march on Mexico City to end the war the way we wanted it ended.

    By the way, we went to war because Mexico couldn’t make its debt payments. Something Bush should think about every time he sells bonds to the Red Chinese to cover the trillions of dollars of government debt he is running up.

  • He’s just telling the faithful a somthing convenient to hear.

    He’s not as crazy as this passage makes him out to be.

    Incompetent – yes. Pandering to religious right – yes. Wiliing to knock down the wall between Church and State for personal/partisan gain – yes. Crazed theocrat – not quite.

  • I agree emphatically with MNProgressive (#2): The root cause of the problem is that Bush is an untreated alcoholic who holds onto external truths to deal with internal problems.

  • The fact is, and I’ve said this before in this forum, that Bush believes God wanted him to be president and so any arbitrary decision he makes is coming from God. Whatever thought enters his head is coming from God. This plays into his narcissism and grandiosity but also his laziness and moral indifference. It lets him off the hook for the horrific results. God works in mysterious ways, you know. And yes, one could look at his presidency in a biblical, Christian framework and see him as the AntiChrist. He’s certainly doing his best, wittingly and not, to bring about the end of days.

  • Having “In God We Trust” on our currency never bothered me but if this crap keeps up…

  • digression alert: considering bush’s statement about democracies not making war on each other, i’ve heard that a better measure is that places with mcdonald’s don’t make war on each other (sarajevo was the first, i think). my question is, did baghdad have a mcdonalds? and does tehran?

  • One of my favorite quotations seems to fit Bush perfectly:

    “I distrust those people who know so well what God wants them to do because I notice it always coincides with their own desires.”

    . . . Susan B. Anthony

  • Bush is making up his own theology. There’s isn’t a damn thing in the bible about democracy. In addition, freedom’s not even a big issue (except maybe the Jews’ exodus from slavery in Egypt) in that book either. He’s just making this sh*t up as he goes along.

  • “freedom’s not even a big issue [in the Bible], except maybe the Jews’ exodus from slavery in Egypt” – petorado

    That’s only because the Jews were the slaves. Once they had their own country, they were happy to enslave others.

  • I think the bigger question is does God believe in George Bush?

    As a great man once said:

    Both read the same Bible and pray to the same God, and each invokes His aid against the other. It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God’s assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other men’s faces, but let us judge not, that we be not judged. The prayers of both could not be answered. That of neither has been answered fully. The Almighty has His own purposes.

  • Maybe they showed Bush how “God” can actually change people’s votes inside those fancy electronic voting machines. Talk about proof that God wants your party to retain power!

    How else would that happen anyway?

  • I may have mentioned this before, but I saw Kevin Phillips recently when he was in Seattle for his “American Theocracy” book tour. Sy Hersh’s article had just made news. Phillips voiced his opinion that the influence of Bush’s religious beliefs over his selection and implementation of policy is an impairment – as in Section 4 of the 25th amendment impairment. Phillips felt that Bush’s continuing comments regarding his being “chosen” by God for this role in history was disturbing in the extreme. Not surprisingly, Phillips felt such comments by Bush call out for Congressional action. He felt impeachment might not be the right remedy. So, he put forward the 25th amendment idea. I did not get a chance to ask him if he could seriously expect that a Congress that dodges its responsibility at every turn would ever dare question the President’s constitutional ability to fulfill the duties of his office – particularly on the grounds that he thinks himself the direct instrument of God’s will on earth.

    I watched the “Televangelist Bush” video on C & L last night and wondered if CB would comment on it. If this were an isolated incidence of “Bush as Evangilical Preacher,” I might not have been nearly as disturbed by it as I was. But, it seems a progression in his behavior. HIs fervor seemed to go well beyond that of a political leader trying to rally support to an unpopular policy. The fervor was fired by what came across to me as the desperation of the delusional. Some may be positively moved by Bush in his role of Preacher in Chief. I found it spooky and disconcerting.

  • Comments are closed.