‘Like prescribing aspirin to take care of prostate cancer’

Reading over the coverage of the [tag]White House[/tag]’s new-found interest in [tag]gas prices[/tag], one thing seems clear: no one actually thinks Bush’s measures will do anything to make gas cheaper. Yesterday, the president emphasized that “every little bit helps,” but I don’t think [tag]Bush[/tag] appreciates the nuances of this political game.

Amid growing Republican unrest about the politics of $3-plus gasoline, Bush told the Renewable Fuels Association he will take the unusual step of suspending shipments to the nation’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve to boost supply and help hold down [tag]oil[/tag] prices. The president also said he will temporarily ease environmental regulations that require the use of cleaner-burning fuel additives to cut down on summertime pollution. […]

This could save consumers a few cents per gallon at best, energy experts said. Philip K. Verleger, an Aspen, Colo.-based oil consultant, said that Bush’s proposals were “more or less like prescribing aspirin to take care of prostate cancer.”

By any reasonable measure, yesterday’s pitch had almost nothing to do with energy policy and everything to do with a White House which is starting to panic a bit about a 32% approval rating.

The strategy seems to be that Bush will show Americans that he’s a) concerned about gas prices, just like they are; and b) doing something. But the risk is even greater than inaction — when Americans notice that gas prices remain largely unchanged, the president has positioned himself for even more [tag]blame[/tag], whether it’s deserved or not.

Indeed, the centerpiece of Bush’s new “plan” — suspending oil shipments to the strategic oil reserve — will, according to the WaPo, “increase the domestic supply by less than 1 percent.” The effort has been tried before, but it’s never had a meaningful effect. The LA Times noted that “even officials in the White House say [Bush’s] actions will have little effect on pump prices.”

On a related note, some of the competing proposals on the Hill were shot down by Republican leaders yesterday. They included plans to curtail tax cuts for oil companies and a measure that would impose a new [tag]tax[/tag] on some oil company profits. Raise your hand if you’re surprised.

With a war with Iran apparently looming it makes perfect sense to stop placing oil in the SPR… the worse the crisis that Iran “causes” the more leeway Bush thinks he will have to deal with them.

What an evil idiot.

  • I don’t think the even advisors who came up with these bits think they’ll do anything; they’re designed to do two things: 1. Do something so if prices happen to decline, he can claim credit. 2. Put the blame on regulations and environmentalists to try to keep people in the wingnut camp.

  • CB mentioned that 89% of oil money goes to Repubs.

    It’s hard to do an ass hand-ectomy based on those numbers alone.

  • Of course reform won’t pass now…it’s way too far away from November. America’s attention span isn’t th…oh look, a bird!

  • Suspending SPR deposits is going to come back and bite Kid George—square on the backside. Consider a replay of last September—remember what the hurricane season did to production capacity? Then, there’s the issue of two regional wars, the addition of a third (Iran), the possibility of the entire ME getting ticked off at the US (embargo redux, anyone?), the growing probability of Venezuela cutting off shipments (oh, but we can just sic Pat Robertson on them again), and the (ad-nauseum) Iran-debacle bringing Russia into play (the EU won’t hold long on action against Tehran if Russia threatens to turn off the oil/gas lifelines). It’s got the makings of a long, hot summer, methinks. Actual fuel “shortages” (there’ve been some spotty disruptions already) can have a disasterous effect on everything. Not just transportation, but manufacturing, utility supply, and even agriculture—I’d like to see someone rig out their great big John Deere with a mast and sail…LOL….

  • I totally agree with Steve. With one exception.

    2 regional wars + Iran does NOT = 3 regional wars

    2 regional wars + Iran = 1 big continental (world?) war.

    Remember, Iran is the only country in between Iraq and Afghanistan…

  • “Remember, Iran is the only country in between Iraq and Afghanistan” – Gridlock

    Hey, Gridlock, good point! (I’m being catty, I pointed this out a few days ago 😉 )

    Really, stop threatening Iran and maybe the price of Oil will drop some.

    Stop buying plastic toys from China to put in kids meals and maybe the price of Oil will drop some.

    Instead of having every state come up with their own ‘botique’ blend of gasoline, figure out multi-state regions based on refinery and gasoline shipments, and have all the refineries in that region formulate ONE least poluting blend. Then maybe gasoline prices will go down.

    Remember, oil companies and gasoline station owners make their biggest profit margins when the price of gasoline is going down (because you become too lazy to shop around for the best price) thus they are enjoying huge profits because Bush’s policies are yo-yoing the price of oil and gasoline.

  • Lance,
    The problem is a bit more intractable than that, alas!

    With the world approaching peak oil, whoever controls the oil (i.e., has an exclusive “arrangement” with the oil producer) is going to be in the strongest position to delay and lessen the effects of oil depletion on its country’s lifestyle/ambitions. As Gridlock noted earlier, you can get one discussion of what’s going on over at Clusterfuck Nation. What we’re witnessing with Iraq and Iran may be the first gambit in a global war over oil. That’s why we want bases there, I suspect. Unfortunately, we elected incompetent leaders, so we’re going to be totally unable to secure these resources when peak oil in fact gets here.

    As for not buying stuff from China, we again have no choice. There is no longer any manufacturing infrastructure over here, even if business was willing to turn back to the expensive US worker. We are entirely an economy of consumers–we don’t actually make anything anymore, we just consume. And bleed our wealth out in a trade deficit. In fact, the Chinese get us two ways: by buying our bonds and then using that leverage to basically require us to buy manufactured products from them. Here, again, we’re checkmated.

    The only solution is to rebuild an economic and lifestyle infrastructure that barely depends on petroleum. But there is no political will, so there is going to be an awful lot of suffering very soon because we keep letting problems get too complicated before making a serious effort to solve them.

  • Comments are closed.