Another study for Bush to ignore on global warming

I’m not sure how the [tag]White House[/tag] will manage to dismiss these results as trivial and/or inconclusive, but I’m sure they’ll think of something.

A scientific study commissioned by the Bush administration concluded yesterday that the lower atmosphere was indeed growing warmer and that there was “clear evidence of human influences on the [tag]climate[/tag] system.”

The finding eliminates a significant area of uncertainty in the debate over [tag]global warming[/tag], one that the administration has long cited as a rationale for proceeding cautiously on what it says would be costly limits on emissions of heat-trapping gases.

For years, global warming skeptics suggested there were discrepancies in the temperatures. The earth’s surface was heating up, they said, but the lower atmosphere wasn’t. This study disproves the claim — both temperatures are going up.

Just as importantly, the [tag]Bush[/tag]-appointed commission also concluded that “the observed patterns of change over the past 50 years cannot be explained by natural processes alone, nor by the effects of short-lived atmospheric constituents such as aerosols and tropospheric ozone alone.” In other words, we’re driving the temperatures up.

Rafe Pomerance, chairman of the Climate Policy Center, a group that advocates mandatory curbs on emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases linked to global warming, said the new report settles the scientific debate over humans’ role.

“This puts the nail in the coffin of [the skeptics’] argument as much as anything I’ve seen,” Pomerance said. “It may not be the first time it’s been said, but it’s the clearest I’ve seen it stated coming out of a government agency. Game over.”

If only reality carried so much sway.

It’s overwhelming, right? Well, maybe, but as far as the Bush administration is concerned, yesterday’s report is just the first in a very long list of reports.

…White House officials noted that this was just the first of 21 assessments planned by the federal Climate Change Science Program, which was created by the administration in 2002 to address what it called unresolved questions. The officials said that while the new finding was important, the administration’s policy remained focused on studying the remaining questions and using voluntary means to slow the growth in emissions of heat-trapping gases like carbon dioxide.

Bush planned this well, not with regards to science or the environment, but in terms of passing the buck. Sure, this new study is conclusive and credible, but there are 20 more studies to go before the White House is prepared to do something about the problem.

By the time the Climate Change Science Program is finished publishing its reports, and proving to the president’s satisfaction that global warming is a genuine crisis, Bush will practically be on his way out of office.

Bush likes to say, “I believe the role of a President is to confront problems — not to pass them on to a future President, future Congress, or a future generation.” It’d be a better soundbite if he meant it.

The bitter legacy of this historically disasterous president will be with us for many years to come. Global Warming, Mid-East tensions, Deficit Spending, Right Wing Judicial Appointments, Energy Shortage, Poverty, A Broken Military, Decline of the Middle Class, Environmental Deterioration, Corporate Special Interests entrencment in all levels of government, and on and on….

A more accruate statement would have been
“I believe the role of a President is to intensify problems , not just pass them on but make them much much worse.”

  • By the time the Climate Change Science Program is finished publishing its reports, and proving to the president’s satisfaction that global warming is a genuine crisis, Bush will practically be on his way out of office.

    Since the reports were commissioned in 2002 and it only took 4 years for the first one, I think we can take that rate (1 report/4 years) and extrapolate and see that we will all be dead when the last report is issued 80 years from now… that is, if DC isn’t underwater by then.

  • Wouldn’t the first step in “voluntary reduction” be publicly acknowledging that there is in fact, a problem?

  • This is the crowd that doesn’t consider evolution a settled scientific fact yet–and they don’t even have to do anything about that. They will need another millenium to grasp global warming. And, my God, any action on this would hurt the moneyed interests, Bush’s gods on earth. Disturb the oligarchy for a bunch of penguins? You’ve got to be kidding. Let’s all just break out the sunscreen.

  • I have a friend who constantly calls global warming as junk science. He always directs me to Anti-science websites like Junkskience (SIC) and Faux News because he FEELS that this is all a scam. The mere mention of Katrina and global warming brought him to near hysterics. “All those global warming scientists are scamming us!” “It’s a lie!”

    When I mentioned to him that the Faux Skiense/sceptik Reporter was busted for not declaring ties to tobacco and oil companies all I heard was the sound of scilence.

    What is my friend’s science background? Uh, political.
    Who does he work for? Uh, the auto industry.
    What is his political affiliation? Rightwinger

    It’s obvious in my little circle of friends that the only folks who believe that humans have no effect on the environs are deluded ideologues who have a vested interest in keeping things the way they are.

  • Obviously, unless all 21 studies conclude the exact same thing the status of global warming will remain “inconclusive.” Logic would dictate that steps be taken to clamp down on this problem in case it was in fact true. If we put strict anti-global warming policies in place and then global warmng theory was proven to be incorrect what harm would have been done? I mean worst case scenario we end up with cleaner air and more advanced technologies. Sure corporations might have to redirect some funds from executive compensation to fund the updates but think of the R&D industry that would blossom to meet these requirements. Creating High-tech jobs in America, reducing obscene CEO salaries, and clean air. Sounds good to me.

  • Wow, so the administration tried to stack the deck as much as it could by appointing a noted global warming skeptic, John Christy, as one of the scientists looking into this?

    And even he had to admit that the alleged discrepancy is no longer present?

    Oh well, he was quickly able to shift to the new “meme”, i.e. that we cannot do anything about so therefore should just adapt to it.

    What a sad bunch of adults we have running this country.

  • White House officials noted that this was just the first of 21 assessments planned by the federal Climate Change Science Program

    Well, that was the report of one group of so-called scientists, but we still haven’t seen the reports from:

    Scientists for Christ, The Lord’s Lab Assistants, Moral Men of Faith and Science, Abstinence Makes the Heart Grow Fonder, Scientists Against Darwin (SAD), and the joint conclusion of several other groups that a few degrees of warming is nothing compared to the fires of hell. I can hardly wait.

  • Interesting to contrast their action on Iraq with
    their non action on global warming, isn’t it?

    Iraq was never a threat to anybody, even if
    it still had WMD.

    Global warming is a threat to everyone.

    So we turn the nation upside down to attack
    a non problem and ignore a coming catastrophe.

    And the American people sit on their asses
    and watch American Idol.

    I give up.

  • Disgusting to think about the taxpayer dollars being wasted on those additional twenty studies. Does anyone with a brain really need 20 more studies to convince them that this is real????

    Even if you’re not 100% on board, MNProgressive has the right idea – why not be proactive? Better safe than sorry and all that. As hark points out, this administration seems to view pre-emptive action as a great idea when it comes to blowing stuff up and lining the pockets of the Halliburtons of the world, but when it comes to global warming they couldn’t be more “cautious.” What a bunch of assholes. Some days I can practically see, feel, even HEAR the contempt for these vermin oozing out of my pores…

    So thanks, Jim Strain, for the list of yet-to-be-heard-from scientists.

    ROTFLMAO.

  • The prez also said we are addicted to oil. Solution: increase supplies. Same scenario a few years ago in response to the blackout. Increase generating capacity. Increase coal mining. Build many new coal fired power plants. Grow. Build. Mine. Drill.

    Some time, some how, some where, some people have to really start questioning the entire idea in which our capitalistic, consumptive economy is based upon — growth. There comes a point in which a threshold of sustainability is crossed when the natural support base is degraded beyond repair and the technological base designed to mitigate the erosion of the natural base can no longer be sustained due to depleted energy and natural resource inputs. The pyramid is turned on its head and collapse becomes inevitable.

    The prez leads the exemptionalist, collusion by delusion brigade that threatens life on this planet. We have met the AXIS of EVIL and our leader is leading the stampede to the apocalypse. But the last people on earth will be free. Some right to lifer this brush cutter.

  • Hey Guys,

    http://www.harvardmagazine.com (May-June 2006) has a provocative article on global warming and its effects in the near future – the article is entitled “Fueling the Future” by Jonathan Shaw. I’m still reading and digesting it. Here’s the link:

    http://www.harvardmagazine.com/on-line/050692.html

    It maintains that global warming is real (of course) and that CO2 levels will almost double within this century even if action is taken immediately. There are some sobering photoshopped satellite pics of inundated coastlines if action is not taken. For example, if half the Greenland ice sheet melts and sea levels rise 3.5 meters, then Lake Okeechobee becomes southernmost Florida (the peninsula further south is underwater), and Manhattan is flooded south of about 25th Street. This could all happen within this century…

    Anyway, “Fueling the Future” is one stop shopping for some cool graphics and statistics and it paints a broad picture of what we will be facing – and it maintains that carbon sequestration (burying carbon dioxide) is inevitable if we’re going to get a handle on global warming…

    I imagine the upcoming hurricane season will put global warming issues on the front pages again…we’re learning that the Bush administration suppressed public discussion of global warming on the part of scientists at NOAA and NASA…insurance companies are already beginning to redline US coastal development…do we really have the luxury to delay debate (and action) any longer???

  • One should note that if Manhattan only floods to around 25th Street, then the sub-basements of all those wonderful skycrapers are going to be flooded. That’s where their physical-plant facilities are. Power systems, security/mainenance sections, et al. Also—the subways will be inundated. In addition rise of that magnitude will prevent some vessels from accessing inner port facilities. But, let’s not quibble about the Big Apple—it’s a liberal stronghold, right? Let’s instead concentrate on coastal oil facilities—the meat and potatoes of the Republikanner warchest. Bulk offloading stations, coastal storage terminals, and the mass of refinery facilities that are fed by these systems, will all be just so much junk. No matter how much money the uberweathy have, they won’t be able to buy petroleum products if there aren’t any petroleum products to buy.

    My neighbor’s Amish buggy is looking better all the time….

  • Comments are closed.