Several reporters praised [tag]Tony Snow[/tag]’s first [tag]White House[/tag] press briefing, but there was one comment that might need some clarification.
A reporter asked [tag]Snow[/tag] about why the White House was reluctant to talk about the NSA’s phone-record database program. Snow said:
“I don’t want to hug the [tag]tar baby[/tag] of trying to comment on the program — the alleged program — the existence of which I can neither confirm nor deny.”
Now, the reporters in the room seemed unfazed. There were no gasps or immediate follow-up questions. But as the New York Times noted today, the “tar baby” phrase “carries vague [tag]racist[/tag] connotations,” and has been used as derogatory term for [tag]African Americans[/tag]. The NYT added, “most politicians and TV commentators prefer to avoid tar baby references.”
As a rule, that seems like a good idea. Think Progress summarized the issue nicely in “memo” to Snow.
Based on the context of the term, we believe you meant tar baby to mean: “a situation almost impossible to get out of; a problem virtually unsolvable.”
But in “American lore,” the expression tar baby is also a racial slur “used occasionally as a derogatory term for black people.” Use of the term has resulted in people being [tag]fired[/tag].
As Random House notes, “some people suggest avoiding the use of the term in any context.” Now that you are no longer at Fox News, you may want to take them up on their advice.
Given the context, I suspect Snow did not have malicious intentions, but it was certainly a poor choice of words. Will the flap linger? Will Snow face pressure to “clarify” his remarks? It seems unlikely — most reporters seem impressed with yesterday’s briefing — but the honeymoon could end rather quickly.