So long, Mr. Jefferson

If the reports are accurate, I have no qualms about throwing Rep. [tag]William Jefferson[/tag] under the bus.

Rep. William J. Jefferson (D-La.), the target of a 14-month public [tag]corruption[/tag] probe, was videotaped accepting $100,000 in $100 bills from a Northern Virginia investor who was wearing an FBI wire, according to a search warrant affidavit released yesterday.

A few days later, on Aug. 3, 2005, FBI agents raided Jefferson’s home in Northeast Washington and found $90,000 of the cash in the freezer, in $10,000 increments wrapped in aluminum foil and stuffed inside frozen-food containers, the document said.

The 83-page affidavit, used to raid Jefferson’s Capitol Hill office on Saturday night, portrays him as a money-hungry man who freely solicited hundreds of thousands of dollars in [tag]bribes[/tag], discussed payoffs to African officials, had a history of involvement in numerous bribery schemes and used his family to hide his interest in high-tech business ventures he promoted in Cameroon, Ghana and Nigeria.

In one instance, at an unidentified D.C. restaurant, Jefferson allegedly exchanged cryptic notes with investor Lori Mody and discussed illegal kickbacks for his children in a telecommunications venture in Nigeria in which she had invested. “All these damn notes we’re writing to each other as if we’re talking as if the FBI is watching,” he told Mody, who was wearing an FBI wire.

Over the weekend, 15 [tag]FBI[/tag] agents raided Jefferson’s Capitol Hill office — authorities said it was the first time the FBI had raided a sitting congressman’s office — and conducted an all-night search.

Of course there’s a presumption of innocence, but it’s fair to say things look really, really bad for William [tag]Jefferson[/tag]. If the [tag]bribery[/tag] charges have merit, and it appears they do, I don’t want him in our caucus; I don’t want him in our party; and I don’t expect him to get any support from Democrats anywhere.

I sure hope the local party is grooming a new candidate, or can find a new good candidate fast!

  • Under the bus it is. Now we just need to focus on getting equal media time for Republican scandals – each one of them.

  • The Dems need to get in front of this thing, and hang the guy out to dry. Beat the GOP to the punch—and leave their spin-artists with nothing but leftover crumbs and well-picked boned. Period.

  • Dems have to rant and rave about this corruption. I was listening to NPR this morning and a guest mentioned that Jefferson’s indictment proved that teh culture of corruption was not just a Republican problem. We cannot play into this. Dems have to be anti-corruption no matter who is corrupt. They need to call for a resignation. They need to disassociate Jefferson from the party and show him no support unlerss he is acquitted.

    The next statement after that needs to be “Now it is the Republican’s turn.” Why hasn’t the Republikan leadership denounced Ney? Why do they still support De Lay? Why have they not expressed remorse and shame about the Cunningham affair, or the Safavian/Abramoff affair, or the K street project?

    I was (insert tongue in cheek) amazed (remove tongue from cheek) to see Republikans leap into action when a Dem was in trouble after doing nothing to address the multiple Republikan corruption. This issue will resonate with voters. We need to press them on it.

  • I sure hope Pelosi handles this properly. Don’t know the proper procedures, but he should be immediately stripped of/from all positions/committees. He should remain a representative in name and voting rights only until the outcome of the investigation, unless and until he is conviced by the Dem leadership to step down to focus on his family.

  • What a shame. Takes only one to balance all the Republican scandals as far as the MSM goes, and that trickles down to the public.

    So throw the bastard under the bus twice.

  • Here is a graphic from yesterday’s NYTimes Week in Review section which illustrates the Republican Culture of Corruption . Where does Rep. Jefferson fit in? No where. He is an isolated case for the Democrats.

  • well, rege, don’t forget mr. mollohan (??) from West Virginia. These two clowns definitely do not help the cause.

  • bubba, I did forget that case and your point is taken. But, so far as we know, and there is no reason to think otherwise, there is no link between Jefferson and the WV Rep. The damming thing about the Republican corruption is the web of interconnection amongst them which suggest that it is systematic. The Jefferson and Mollohan are isolated from each other and do not serve as evidence of a systematic problem for the Democrats. So my point stands.

  • Bubba,

    I posted on this a few weeks ago (I think here). Pelosi was asked about Jefferson and she basically said 1) she hopes the charges are false, 2) She has not met with Jefferson, 3) She will not meet with Jefferson while he is under intictment, 4) he is innocent until proven guilty.

    This is the perfect approach. I just have not seen anyone else publicly reitterate these points. She distanced herself and the caucus from Jefferson without incriminating him. I was impressed.

  • Strange, where were the raids on Cunningham’s office? Or DeLay’s office? Or Ney’s office?

    Wasn’t DeLay’s staff running a ‘criminal enterprise’ out of his office? Isn’t that good enough reason to go on a raid?

    But Jefferson, ah, run into his office on an all-nighter!

    Pure partisanship.

  • rege, et al, my point was that Mr. Jefferson is not an “isolated case” for the democrats. There are two major cases for the Dems. Yes, they may be isolated from one another and both cases do not involve the intricate web of corruption presented by the GOP. But the fact of the matter is that these two clowns provide potential cover to the GOP, rigthly or wrongly, and in particular to the Limbaughs, Hannitys and O’Reilly’s (and their listeners) of the world. Which is why it is important for folks like Pelosi and the Dem leadership to do all that is possible to strip these two of any additional influence anywhere within the party system pending investigations, and go beyond just words and comments.

  • bubba, I don’t want to belabor the point, but I will, because that’s what blogs are for. From the Free Dictionary,

    isolated – marked by separation of or from usually contiguous elements; “little isolated worlds, as abruptly disjunct and unexpected as a palm-shaded well in the Sahara”- Scientific Monthly
    disjunct
    separate – independent; not united or joint; “a problem consisting of two separate issues”; “they went their separate ways”; “formed a separate church”

    By isolated I did not mean singular, rather I meant unconnnected. While my original comment concerned only Jefferson, hence there could be no interconnection with other Democrats, the addition of the second Democratic Congressman did not change my point, because, in fact, there is no evidence of a connection between the two.

    I don’t think there is a real disagreement between us. I too think the Republicans will try to conflate the Democrats corruption with their own and the MSM will pitch in and give them a hand. My point is that we should push back by pointing out the systematic nature of the Republican corruption which is distinct from the isolated instances of Democratic corruption.

  • Lance captured my thoughts… They need to smear a Dem just to make it look bi-partisan… Jefferson has given the Republicans and their echo chamber in the media a very potent weapon.

  • Lance has a point. We absolutely should condemn Jefferson, but why is this the first time the FBI has ever raided a congressperson’s office? Why have there been no raids of the offices of Republicans, despite the multiple corruption scandals? It seems a bit fishy.

  • I share everyone else’s sentiments, I think. Dems should shun him and eject him from the party if that’s possible for them to do. (I don’t know how party procedure works.) I’m sure the GOP would be willing to accept him. But how many other Republicans with similar levels of blatant corruption is the GOP protecting?

  • Well, Harry Reid has been busy dealing with Jack Abramahoff. This scandal is still growing and it looks really bad especially given Reid’s well known early comments on this. More and more information has emerged (Yes, Abramahoff gave money to Reid through proxies). Unfortunately, this is how congress works. I’m sure 90% of other politicians have done similar things.

    Also, Patrick Kennedy’s cover-up on DWI and his false statements to police (“late for vote”) reminds people too much about the culture of corruption, cover-up (Chappaquiddick!) and elitism in Kennedy family. As a Democrat, I would not emphasize the culture of corruption too much as it can backfire.

    Sometimes it makes sense being silent (especially given that the image of Nancy Pelosi being house leader does not excite anybody).

  • BTW, what happens to Jefferson? Is he going to run in November and if not is his district a safe district for democrats?

    Is it too late to change a candidate?

  • Since Jefferson has claimed he will not step down, let me toss out a radical idea: what if the Dems moved for expulsion?

    It seems to me this does a number of useful things. First, it shows that we are consistent and hard on corruption. Second, however, it really begs the public to ask the question “there are Rethugs who did worse, why are they still around?” Third, it puts the Rethugs in an interesting spot. If they vote to support the Dems expulsion of one of their own, they help make the Dems look good and draw unfavorable comparisons to how they police their own transgressors. If they vote against expulsion, they appear to be saying it is ok for a Congressman to take $100,000 in bribes.

    What am I missing here? How is this not a good political move for the Dem caucus?

  • I’m not sure if I understood this right. Expulsion from congress?
    Is it legal? I’m a bit doubtful about that. Besides, he has not been convicted yet. It would be quite dangerous to allow congress the power to expulse elected officials from congress.

    Wouldn’t it be fun for the majority party to expulse all members of the minority party.

  • Expulsion is the proper means for remove someone from Congress. The reason the majority party doesn’t do so is that it requires a 2/3rds vote.

  • Ed, at #17thanks.
    Zeitgeist, I like your idea. I must ask at what point should Democrats move to do so. Although what we now know is pretty damning and it is hard to imagine any exculpatory circumstance, the fact remains that he hasn’t even been charged with a crime. Do the Democrats wait for an indictment? Do they wait for a conviction? Or do they move now?

  • “Expulsion is the proper means for remove someone from Congress. The reason the majority party doesn’t do so is that it requires a 2/3rds vote. ”

    Maybe we can get a two for one, and expel both Ney and Jefferson 😉

  • So once majority party gets 2/3 of seats then they can legally expulse all minority party members ?

    To be honest, I really don’t like this idea. Once convicted, then this is of course reasonable thing to do.

  • What does it take for the bleeding liberals to recognize a “crook” and just leave it there! All I read is now go after the Republicans! How about going after anyone that breaks the laws especially the one’s that hold such a powerful position! Whoever it is that abuses the system should be convicted and sentenced and on top loose any benefits or pension!!!! I sure do not remember any of you Demys saying this for the likes of Clinton et al!

  • Comments are closed.