‘You always want to polarize somebody’

[tag]Allen Raymond[/tag], a former [tag]RNC[/tag] official and one of the few Republican officials to go to jail as a result of the New Hampshire [tag]phone-jamming[/tag] [tag]scandal[/tag] of 2002, sat down this week with the Boston Globe for his first post-incarceration interview. Apparently, he’s had time to reflect on what his party is all about.

[Raymond] said the scheme reflects a broader [tag]culture[/tag] in the [tag]Republican Party[/tag] that is focused on dividing voters to win primaries and general elections. He said examples range from some recent efforts to use border-security concerns to foster anger toward immigrants to his own role arranging phone calls designed to polarize primary voters over abortion in a 2002 New Jersey Senate race.

“A lot of people look at politics and see it as the guy who wins is the guy who unifies the most people,” he said. “I would disagree. I would say the candidate who wins is the candidate who [tag]polarize[/tag]s the right bloc of [tag]voters[/tag]. You always want to polarize somebody.”

Raymond stressed that he was making no excuses for his role in the New Hampshire case; he pleaded guilty and told the judge he had done a “bad thing.” But he said he got caught up in an ultra-aggressive atmosphere in which he initially thought the decision to jam the phones “pushed the envelope” but was [tag]legal[/tag]. He also said he had been reluctant to turn down a prominent official of the RNC, fearing that would cost him future opportunities from an organization that was becoming increasingly ruthless.

“[tag]Republicans[/tag] have treated campaigns and politics as a business, and now are treating public policy as a business, looking for the types of returns that you get in business, passing legislation that has huge ramifications for business,” he said. “It is very much being monetized, and the federal government is being monetized under Republican majorities.”

As Digby put it, “It’s amazing what happens to people when they run into trouble with the law, isn’t it? Talk about your moral clarity.”

According to this former top GOP operative, today’s Republican Party believes in not only pushing the envelope in terms of what’s legal, but it’s also anxious to tear the electorate in half, and hopes the GOP is left with the bigger chunk. In terms of policy making, the distinction between cut-throat campaigning and governing is practically gone. It’s all part of the “broader culture in the Republican Party.”

This should come as a surprise to, well, no one, but it’s always nice to have an experienced Republican insider admit it.

And this post really clarifies for me my position on the Sunday Discussion topic. Yes, the Rethugs have had great success. Yes, we need to get a lot tougher and more willing to have a street fight to win. But it is imperative that we do so in a way that does not result in the loss of our own moral compass — we need to change how we do things, but not so much that we become what we despise. Winning formula or not, the above story should never be able to be told about us. Not only is it a betrayal of progressive values, it is simply bad for the country. It makes the government ungovernable. It encourages disunity among citizens. It undermines the nature of democratic institutions. It makes discourse and the innovation that comes from open-minded thinking virtually impossible. If this is the culture Delay helped accellerate, then my answer to whether we should be like Delay is a resounding “no.”

  • In the limited time that each of us has on earth, we have many opportunities to take the high road or the low road, and in the end, the choices we make determine who we are. We can treat others with respect or distain, we can leave the world a slightly better place or a worse place. Personally, I don’t know many people who at the end of the day are likely to say, “gee, I wish I’d been more of a scumbag,” but apparently Raymond and those like him are attempting to rule that out as a possibility.

  • Good point, Zeitgeist. It does sort of close the book on that discussion. And now…

    Let us pray. Our fallen brother Allen Raymond, having had slam-time to examine his life, hath seen the error of his ways. He hath moved away from parsibly legal electioneering tricks, telling the judge that what he hath done were indeed a bad thing. Yea, let us now hope brother Allen readeth brother David Brock’s story of his own salvation, Blinded by the Right”, and continueth on the path to righteousness. Amen.

    Sister Andy Coulter will now pass among you with a milk-bucket in which you may place your offering (the price of her latest sacred text).

  • Wow, I am apparently no longer shocked by Republican transgressions and “liberties” taken with the law but I find myself floored when one of these people comes clean. I wonder when this guy is going to be blamed for everything from small pox to terrorism.

  • Fear and hate are the other tools the GOP likes to use. Divide the populace along non-existent lines, then pump in the hate and fear.

  • “It is very much being monetized..”

    The essense of the dysfunction,and it cuts across party lines.
    Raymond describes government as a business in a way that compares to an AIDS like virus that disables the ability of government to function independently to protect itself from private interests
    Any politician attempting to fight a big money interest becomes infected with big money obligations to someone else.
    I do not see a clear solution on the horizion. Is real reform still possible or have we lost our democracy to monetizism?

  • #6 kali…

    Public financing of campaigns is not without it’s own problems but seems a reasonable place to begin — if we could ever get it on the table.

  • Raymond’s comments are valuable because they put a new spin on our perception of the GOP political machine. Every time we hear the name “Karl Rove” we remember the ruthlessness, but what’s new here are Raymond’s comments about politics and policy becoming a “business” and (as kali notes) the “monetizing” of government.

    This is what happens when people demand a “CEO president” or a “government run like a corporation.” Be careful what you wish for.

  • If the RNC published a contract with America today it would really be a contract, much like the one that the Duke is supposed to have had:

    Laws……………You pay only

    Tort reform…………..$ 20 Million
    Bankruptcy reform………$45 Million
    Prescription Drgu reform…….$100 Million
    Assorted earmarks………….$500,000 each

  • Or, to tweak that a bit:

    Bribe for Tort Reform………..$20 millio
    Bribe for Drug Benefit……….$100 million
    Local Earmarks………………20% of expected benefit

    Knowing BushCo will pardon you when you’re caught……..priceless.

  • The line that disturbs me the most is when Raymond says not only have the Repubs been treating public policy as a business, but they are also expecting returns. Returns? Elected officials are public servants. There should be no talk of expecting “business-like returns” on the public’s money just because these officials won the lottery and were elected to public office.

    Now Bush’s president as CEO remarks are becoming clear: just like other incompetent CEOs he’s still going to walk away from the burning hulk of the ship of state with a golden parachute and a satisfied feeling that no matter what happened it was only other people’s money that was at risk.

  • When I was growing up I was always taught that it wasn’t whether you won or lost, but how you played the game – sigh. I guess this further exposes the lie of Bush being a uniter and not a divider.

    Out of all the damage wreaked on the country by the Republicant’s over the last dozen or so years the unity of the people may prove to be the most difficult to fix.

  • Unity?

    The last time the country really had much unity was under Eisenhower, and it was a time of the nation foolishly pursuing a manic anti-Soviet policy, ignoring peace feelers from the USSR after Stalin (and the advice of even Winston Churchill to listen to them), the real growth into the modern ‘military industrial complex’, a period of paranoid McCarthyism and John Birch.

    Even under the following president, JFK, as he travelled in Dallas there was a full page ad saying he was ‘wanted for treason’, and his own Joint Chiefs were trying to push him into staging a phony terrorist attack as a pretense for war with Cuba and to send combat troops to Viet Nam, with much of the public agreeing.

    Unity is not that impossible. It’s all what the leaders choose to focus on.

    Imagine a leader saying our nation will work for freedom in more peaceful ways – few would disagree. It’s when the leaders trumpet gay marriage and choose division that the unity is difficult. Divisiveness has been used as a political tool by republicans (and occassionally democrats), especially recently but since at least 1948 in modern times.

    It brought us wonderful things like the arms race, when both parties found they needed to outdo each other in rhetoric.

    The democrats’ problem is getting the public’s attention on big issues instead of the republicans’ divisive ones.

    That’s where the media control established by the right helps a lot. Another round on gay marriage it is.

    The left needs to build more media itself.

  • Comments are closed.