Joe Wilson doesn’t sound done with this story

There have been rumors for quite some time about [tag]Joseph Wilson[/tag] and [tag]Valerie Plame[/tag] filing a [tag]civil suit[/tag] against Karl Rove and others in the White House for the now-infamous leak, and today’s statement from Wilson’s lawyers suggests they haven’t forgotten.

“We have become aware of the communication between Mr. [tag]Fitzgerald[/tag] and Mr. [tag]Luskin[/tag] concerning [tag]Karl Rove[/tag]’s status in the criminal investigation. We have no first-hand knowledge of the reason for the communication or what further developments in the criminal investigation it may signal. While it appears that Mr. Rove will not be called to answer in criminal court for his participation in the wrongful disclosure of Valerie Wilson’s classified employment status at the CIA in retaliation against Joe Wilson for questioning the rationale for war in Iraq, that obviously does not end the matter. The day still may come when Mr. Rove and others are called to account in a court of law for their attacks on the Wilsons.”

And one other thought on this: in one important way, the ongoing investigation became a convenient excuse for the White House not to answer questions about the scandal. If no one (else) on the president’s staff is going to face charges, Tony Snow and others will have one less excuse to blow off legitimate inquiries that the Bush gang has ignored. For example:

With the news that White House senior adviser Karl Rove apparently will not be indicted in the CIA leak investigation, Media Matters for America urges the media to ask the following question: What about his [tag]security clearance[/tag]?

As Media Matters has previously explained, both Rove’s apparent confirmation of CIA officer Valerie Plame’s identity to syndicated columnist Robert D. Novak and his alleged disclosure of her identity to Time magazine correspondent Matthew Cooper should trigger the loss of his security clearance under the Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement.

In November 2005, Knight Ridder reported that “sixteen former CIA and military intelligence officials … urged President Bush to suspend top political adviser Karl Rove’s security clearance following revelations that he played a role in outing CIA officer Valerie [tag]Plame[/tag].”

The Bush gang will probably find an excuse to blow this off again, but the old excuse no longer seems applicable.

If no one (else) on the president’s staff is going to face charges, Tony Snow and others will have one less excuse to blow off legitimate inquiries that the Bush gang has ignored.

Yes, but what if Rove flipped and Cheney’s under investigation? Stranger things have happened.

  • CB writes: “If no one (else) on the president’s staff is going to face charges, Tony Snow and others will have one less excuse to blow off legitimate inquiries that the Bush gang has ignored.”

    The Bush Sadministration won’t feel the least bit compelled to answer questions about this now, any more than it did before. To paraphrase the Chimp in Chief–“the interestin’ thing about bein’ pResident is that I don’t hafta answer to anybody, they gotta answer to me.” Bush makes his own laws and his own rules and continues to get away with it. If a straight shooter like Fitz can’t get these criminals to own up, I despair that anyone can. Certainly, Tony Snow won’t be shamed into answering anything.

  • If no one (else) on the president’s staff is going to face charges, Tony Snow and others will have one less excuse to blow off legitimate inquiries that the Bush gang has ignored.

    Sadly, I think the excuse will just change from “we aren’t going to comment on an ongoing criminal investigation” to “we aren’t going to comment on an ongoing criminal case [against Libby].”

    It’ll be a cold day in hell before they actual answer real questions about Rove’s involvement.

  • A well timed civil suit (where the burden of proof is less than in a criminal trial – I know this thanks to OJ) might keep Karl busy during the upcoming election season. It must be hard to coordinate a 50 state attack on all of your opponents while at the same time defending yourself in court.

  • I do not understand why Fitzgerald is not indicting rove, libby et al for outing a CIA undercover agent. Maybe I missed something, but wasn’t that the original reason for the investigation?

    Fitzgerald knows Libby, Cheney, Fleischer, Rove, Addington, and others were focused on Wilson for discrediting the WH reasons for going to war. And in retaliation leaked his wife’s name to the press — as there seems to be plenty of evidence — why is Fitz not pursuing charges against them for doing so?

    Intention seems fairly obvious … not too difficult to prove after all has been said and done. I don’t “get it”!! Or did I miss something down the line?

  • Pat Fitzgerald probably smoked a joint or stepped on some flowers at the dean’s house back in his school days, and some one is telling him to cool it or he’ll be next up for career assassination. (my whole house is lined with tin foil)

  • Comments are closed.