No wonder they think ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ is necessary

One of the aspects to the “[tag]Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell[/tag]” policy that’s always bothered me, aside from the transparent bigotry, is the Pentagon’s inability to explain the purpose of the rule.

Physically-fit, well-trained Americans, who want to volunteer for military service during a time of war, and who have conducted themselves as military personnel should, want to wear the uniform and serve their country. Their government tells them not to. Asked why, the Pentagon will offer vague rhetoric about “unit cohesion,” but the explanation not only lacks detail, it lacks coherence.

Maybe the policy has something to do with the Pentagon thinking gay people are mentally ill.

A [tag]Pentagon[/tag] document classifies [tag]homosexuality[/tag] as a [tag]mental disorder[/tag], decades after mental health experts abandoned that position.

The document outlines retirement or other discharge policies for service members with physical disabilities, and in a section on defects lists homosexuality alongside mental retardation and personality disorders.

Critics said the reference underscores the Pentagon’s failing policies on gays, and adds to a culture that has created uncertainty and insecurity around the treatment of homosexual service members, leading to anti-gay harassment.

The Center for the Study of Sexual Minorities in the Military, at the University of California at Santa Barbara, uncovered the document and pointed to it as further proof that the military deserves failing grades for its treatment of gays.

For what it’s worth, the document caused a bit of a stir yesterday, as medical professionals, nine members of Congress, and the American Psychiatric Association, among others, condemned the Defense Department Instruction. A Pentagon spokesman said the policy document is under review.

Maybe the Pentagon statement was written by the Vatican.

  • Was this policy classification active during the Clinton years or was it something that was brought back after 2001?

  • …on the other hand, you kinda need to have SOME mental issues to volunteer these days, what with Iraq and so on the platter… At least back in my day, it was only Kosovo and such- relatively peaceful.

  • Historically, the Pentagon has never been good at psychiatry so it should not be a shock.

    The US military in WW2 rejected the highest number of applicants as mentally unfit (10%), yet suffered the highest number of psychological casulties per capita than any nation involved in WW2.

    In Korea and Vietnam they pushed for more indoctrination and training (as seen in glimpses in Full Metal Jacket) in response to their WW2 issues.

    Psychological casulties were almost as numerous as VD cases.

    The best at it were the Nazi era Germans who took a more humane approach (Nazi? Humane? Only for the soldiers of the fatherland) to psychological cases (by treating them as wounded) and got great results. Where did they get it from? From a post WW1 American study on PSTD. Apparently, American generals didn’t like the egghead stuff and shitcanned it.

    Been pretty much screwed ever since.

  • Further proof, if proof was needed, that military intelligence is to actual intelligence as military music is to actual music as military justice is to actual justice. I’m the first to say we need a military, and that the people I served with and all the ones I’ve known ever since are fine individuals (though some can be pretty damn dumb, just like civilians), but I’ve never experienced in any other place than the military – both as a serving member and as someone who has written extensively about the service over the years since – more routine half-assed moronic stupidity on the part of the system and the kool-aidd drinkers who carry it out. Their stupidity is so fucking stupid it boggles belief and makes me wonder how we have ever been successful militarily. And then I remember most of the people I knew always felt they were doing their job in spite of the system (and frequently doing it to spite the system).

    “A Pentagon spokesman said the policy document is under review.”

    Yep, CYA, all the way, every day. No wonder my friend the late David Hackworth used to call them “the perfumed princes of Versailles-on-the-Potomac.”

  • Tom, I know you know that Military Intelligence has nothing to do with this and does not mean the level of intelligence in the military in general.

    Military Intelligence refers to those portions of the military concerned with the collection of military data from enemies (and potential enemies) on their capabilities and intentions and plans.

    The joke “Military Intelligence, there’s a contradiction of terms (an Oxymoron)” is funny, but not really to the point.

    Please don’t confuse the civilians.

  • I think “unit cohesion” suffers more from the lowering of standards the Army is currently implementing to attract more recruits, than it would by getting rid of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”.

  • Comments are closed.