How big a Bush bounce?

Not quite two weeks ago, news outlets had it all figured out for us: [tag]Bush[/tag] has the momentum and will inevitably surge in the polls. Indeed, in many instances, the media didn’t wait for the public to express their [tag]approval[/tag]; they simply asserted it.

Knight Ridder said Bush “is on a bit of a roll.” Roll Call reported that “Republicans are taking the past two weeks’ run of good news as evidence that the party’s political fortunes may be on the rebound.” The WaPo emphasized the “spate of positive developments” that may interrupt “the president’s months-long slide in opinion [tag]polls[/tag].” The New York Daily News quoted a top Republican source saying, “We’ve got so much good news popping out these days I don’t know where to start.”

That was shortly after Zarqawi had been killed. So, how big a “Bush [tag]bounce[/tag]” are we talking about here? Well, as it turns out, it’s a pretty modest one.

Bush’s approval rating is at 37%. After hitting the low point of his presidency at 31% in May, it rose to 38% in mid-June. His standing, which slipped below 40% in February, hasn’t rebounded above that level since then.

In other words, according to [tag]Gallup[/tag], the president’s support has slipped a little since the headlines trumpeted all of the good fortune that had come Bush’s way.

The president fared a little better in a new Washington Post/ABC News [tag]poll[/tag], where is approval rating is up to 38%, but that’s the same as it was in April. For that matter, 48% of Americans in this poll said they “strongly disapprove” of how Bush is handling his job — an all-time high in a Post/ABC poll. A big Bush bounce? I don’t think so.

The polls also had some interesting data on public perceptions about the war in Iraq.

A majority of Americans say Congress should pass a resolution that outlines a plan for withdrawing U.S. troops from Iraq, according to a [tag]USA TODAY[/tag]/Gallup Poll taken Friday through Sunday. […]

The poll finds support for the ideas behind Democratic proposals that were soundly defeated in the Senate last week. An uptick in optimism toward the war after the killing of terrorist leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi earlier this month seems to have evaporated.

In all, USAT/Gallup found that 57% of Americans believe Congress should pass a resolution that outlines a plan for withdrawing U.S. troops, and 50% want redeployment “immediately or within 12 months.”

The Post/ABC numbers were slightly different — 51% said we shouldn’t set a deadline; 47% said we should — but the momentum seems to be shifting in a more progressive direction. In December, 60% said no deadline, while 39% wanted one, but after a week of non-stop “[tag]cut and run[/tag]” rhetoric from the [tag]GOP[/tag], a deadline for withdrawing/deploying troops seems to be far more popular than it was a few months ago.

Why so many congressional [tag]Democrats[/tag] are afraid of taking a popular position on the war is a mystery.

“Why so many congressional Democrats are afraid of taking a popular position on the war is a mystery.”

There is no mystery. They have lost touch with ordinary Americans, just as have the More-of-the-Same Rethugs. That is complicated by the fact that too many of the Dems suffer from the “Charley Brown Syndrome,” characterized by too many times of trusting the electorate but having the electoral “football” pulled away at the last second, and also as the result of the smear and distortion two-step so effectively practiced by the RightWingNoiseMachine.

There is no mystery. When more Americans worry about who will win American Idol or The Donald’s show (I don’t even know the name) than worry about the dissipation of their rights, then it is hard for the Dems to fight a losing battle. But fight they should, and more seem to be finding what’s left of their spines. If Americans can wake up from their collective snooze and stop being so happy in their misery, maybe we can throw the bastards out.

  • Ed said, Maybe the solution would be to put ALL elected officials on the Minimum Wage.

    That would be one way to ensure that the minimum wage was increased on a regular basis!!!

    As for W’s bounce…there’s a term used in the stock market that he should be familiar with: Dead cat bounce. That’s about the size of it.

  • Didn’t 2004 prove that the American Voter is the morale equivilant of the callow youth who seduces the girl then dumps her the next day. Americans are telling the polsters they want America out of Iraq. But if the Democrats take up America’s cause, they are just going to get screwed and left with a soiled reputation, because the American Voter votes for “Leaders”.

    It’s far better to focus on the Bushites’ incompetence and make the case that Democrats are not going to follow the polls but rather implement policies that Americans, on reflection, will decide to support.

  • “Why so many congressional Democrats are afraid of taking a popular position on the war is a mystery.”

    Clinton was right about trying to reform healthcare and it was a popular position. Until it wasn’t. These vague polls are meaningless until you actually get policy and the two parties’ positions out there. And like its been said over and over, the left was right about Vietnam and it’s been paying for it ever since. If there was no tension between good policy and good politics, the dems be in control of all three branches and not the GOP.

  • ***A big Bush bounce? I don’t think so.***
    CB

    Now, CB…you know full well that the GOP is “the profession of making mountains out of mole-hills.” But then again—in response to the Viagra comment by kali—they’re going to need a lot more than drugs to get the rating “up….”

  • “Why so many congressional Democrats are afraid of taking a popular position on the war is a mystery.”

    Not very mysterious at all. I recall polls suggesting 80% support in the public at large for medical marijuana, yet I’m reasonably certain the Hinchey-Rohrabacher Amendment to leave that issue up to the states won’t come anywhere near passing (went down 2 to 1 last time, I think). Since unseating an incumbent congressperson is nigh-impossible these days, they have little incentive to care where the public stands on the issues.

    My guess is that congressional Democrats are in tune with their true constituents’ , that is big $ donors’, concerns. Its only natural to dance with the ones who bring you to the party.

  • Comments are closed.