Deposing some top Republicans — and not just in the Plame case

Yesterday, the announcement that Valerie and Joseph Wilson are filing a civil suit against top White House officials involved in the Plame scandal sparked speculation about the interesting insights to be gained through the [tag]discovery[/tag] process. But as long as we’re talking about deposing [tag]Republicans[/tag] in a civil suit, let’s not forget the [tag]New Hampshire[/tag] [tag]phone-jamming[/tag] [tag]scandal[/tag].

A New Hampshire judge yesterday cleared the way for Democrats to question top Republican Party officials — including its former national committee chairman — in connection with a 2002 phone-jamming scheme, as a local political scandal continues to reach into the realm of national politics.

Hillsborough County Superior Court Judge Philip Mangones granted the Democrats’ request to allow depositions of Republican officials. Each subpoena would have to be granted on a case-by-case basis, however. If individual subpoenas are granted, officials will be forced to answer questions under oath about whether they were involved in the plan to tie up Democratic get-out-the-vote hot lines on Election Day 2002.

“We want to figure out the scope of the conspiracy,” said Finis E. Williams III, an attorney for the New Hampshire Democratic Party. “Was the White House involved in this? We’d like to know that. The Republicans have never to this day come forward and come clean and said who was involved in this and who wasn’t.”

That hardly seems like an unreasonable position to take. Indeed, I can think of five pretty important questions that Republicans have been avoiding from the beginning.

* Why did James Tobin call the White House 12 times on Election Day 2002 while he was criminally interfering with an election?

* Why did the RNC pay Tobin’s legal bills?

* Why did the RNC consult with the White House about paying those bills?

* Why does indicted phone-jammer Shaun Hansen believe his company carried out a scheme that had the seal of approval of both the Republican National Committee and the White House?

* And how is it that Jack Abramoff’s tribal clients donated the almost-exact amount of the cost of the phone jamming to the New Hampshire GOP, despite the fact that New Hampshire doesn’t have any federally recognized Indian tribes or Indian gambling?

Thanks to yesterday’s court ruling, Republicans who’ll have to give [tag]depositions[/tag] include Ed [tag]Gillespie[/tag], who was chairman of the RNC chairman at the time; former RNC political director Terry Nelson, now a top John McCain adviser; Chris LaCivita, former national political director for the National Republican Senatorial Committee; and Alicia Davis, who worked in the White House political affairs office under Ken Mehlman, the current RNC chairman.

I still have a hunch this one could get interesting. Stay tuned.

Sometimes I get the feeling I’m the only one who finds this story fascinating. Oh well…

  • I also find it interesting! I’m simply pessimistic that there will be any true accountability. Please continue the updates.

  • Not at all… I think there are so many issues flying about right now that it’s impossible to maintain an appropriate sense of interest or outrage without bursting blood vessels (or getting fired). Reactions to the Plame/Wilson suit were also telling. Whereas the net was abuzz with “Fitzmas” over revelations in the past in the past, I read more “wait and see” caution this time in comments here and elsewhere.

  • Here here! It’s still early in the case yet, and we may all be suffering from a bit of a letdown after Rove walked (so far) in the Plame case to get excited about this one just yet.

    But we definitely want to keep abreast of it in case it starts to make the bad guys start sweating for real. Keep it coming, CB! 🙂

  • I also think it is interesting CB. I hope you keep reporting on it and perhaps the MSM will eventually catch on. I think it is incredible how I read something herre that is eventually picked up as “news” many months later.

  • I agree with everyone else – this is an important story – keep reporting on it.

  • As said above others, this scandal is a sleeper. Keep reporting on it. I’ll keep reading it, but really don’t have much to add beyond, “damn Republican scumbags”. And I don’t see the point in repeatedly spouting such vindictives. I have other ways to keep my blood pressure in check.

  • Just wondering…..

    How many other states the Ratpublicans had phone jamming operations going on in….

    All 50 no doubt!

    Don’t dare think it wasn’t all 50.

    The Ratpublicans just got a really dumb one in charge in NH is all.

    One so dumb as to call the White House mastermind of this illegal act 12 times on election day.

    .

  • The Plame story has been a sleeper for three years, but it keeps snoring. I look for the civil trial to be interesting. Still, as I’ve said before, it’s shameful to have to go to court in order to examine an issue that should be thoroughly investigated by Congress.

  • Keep the faith, CB, this could be the “third rate burglary” that turns into something really big.
    The fact that Abramoff had his slimy hands on it seems the most intriguing

  • I’ve been away all morning. Sorry I missed this. TWO HOURS before the first comment (CB’s)? Until we take back at least the House, the courts are our ONLY active unit of government. By “active” I mean, literally “non hostile”. And the longer it takes to win back the White House and Senate, the less friendly even the courts will be. We never should’ve trusted Fitzgerald’s investigation to do anything other serve Fitzgerald. It’s an old boy’s club which needs a damn good shaking.

  • The legal wheels turn slow but they grind mighty fine.

    Thanks a million, CB. (and that’s still too mean)

  • maybe the democrats should be saying ‘how would you feel if they were jamming the phone lines for “american idol”?’

    your pal,
    nascar blake

  • It’s all of a piece: election fraud in Florida, election fraud in Ohio, election fraud in New Hampshire. I have no proof but I’m positive GOP election fraud occurs whenever and wherever possible. As Nixon said, “The object is to win.”

    You’re definitely not the only one interested in this story. By all means, continue to afflict the comfortable.

  • Comments are closed.