‘The Bubble’ lives

During the 2004 presidential campaign, the Bush-Cheney campaign enforced a rigorous “bubble,” which limited audiences to pre-screened sycophants, some of whom were asked to sign loyalty oaths. During Bush’s campaign to privatize Social Security, a strictly-enforced bubble was used again, ensuring that the president would only take “questions” from those who were already convinced Bush was right.

The bubble hasn’t been used quite as much recently, and in a few instances, the president has even deigned to be in the same room as people who disagree with him. Does this mean we can finally put all of the “Bubble Boy” unpleasantness behind us and celebrate the president’s new-found interest in diversity of thought? Not so much.

When school was canceled to accommodate a campaign visit by President Bush, the two 55-year-old teachers reckoned the time was ripe to voice their simmering discontent with the administration’s policies.

Christine Nelson showed up at the Cedar Rapids rally with a Kerry-Edwards button pinned on her T-shirt; Alice McCabe clutched a small, paper sign stating “No More War.” What could be more American, they thought, than mixing a little dissent with the bunting and buzz of a get-out-the-vote rally headlined by the president?

Their reward: a pair of handcuffs and a strip search at the county jail.

Local authorities said Nelson and McCabe “refused to obey reasonable security restrictions,” though that wouldn’t necessarily explain the need for a strip search. Regardless, Nelson, who teaches history and government, insisted that she was taken away because she “had a dissenting opinion.”

Given recent history, I’m inclined to believe the dissenters. After all, those enforcing Bush’s bubble don’t have a terrific track record.

* In August 2004, John Prather, a mild-mannered math professor at Ohio University, was removed by security from a presidential event on public property because he wore a shirt that promoted John Kerry.

* On July 4, 2004, Nicole and Jeff Rank were arrested at a Bush event in West Virginia for wearing T-shirts that criticized the president. (About the same time the Ranks were being taken away in handcuffs, Bush was reminding the audience, “On this 4th of July, we confirm our love of freedom, the freedom for people to speak their minds.” Gotta love irony.)

* In July 2004, Jayson Nelson, a county supervisor in Appleton, Wis., was thrown out of a presidential event because of a pro-Kerry T-shirt. An event staffer saw the shirt, snatched the VIP ticket, and called for police. “Look at his shirt! Look at his shirt!” Nelson recalled the woman telling the Ashwaubenon Public Safety officer who answered the call. Nelson said the officer told him, “You gotta go,” and sternly directed him to a Secret Service contingent that spent seven or eight minutes checking him over before ejecting him from the property.

* In October 2004, three Oregon schoolteachers were removed from a Bush event and threatened with arrest for wearing t-shirts that said “Protect Our Civil Liberties.”

* In March 2005, three Denver residents were threatened with arrest at a Bush event because one of them had an anti-war bumper sticker on their car.

* In February 2006, Cindy Sheehan was taken into custody for wearing a T-shirt that read, “2,245 Dead — How Many More?” to the State of the Union.

With that background, the idea that Christine Nelson would be taken into custody for wearing a Kerry-Edwards button pinned on her T-shirt doesn’t seem terribly far-fetched.

The good news is McCabe and Nelson are suing three unnamed Secret Service agents, the Iowa State Patrol, and two county sheriff deputies who took part in their arrest. Their suit alleges that officials violated their right to free speech, assembly, and equal protection.

I’ll let you know how the case goes, but in the meantime, let’s not forget: “The Bubble” lives on.

Absolutely incredibly.

I guess Ms. Nelson will be able to add a whole new lecture for her government classes in freedom of speech and assembly, and how they really work in the good ol’ U S of A today, as well as a lesson on who is responsible to whom.

  • Now there is a case I would take pro bono. . . but as Bubba says, this will only make her a better teacher of civics. I can only imagine as election season heats up here how many more of these incidents we will see. My guess is they will be directly proportional to how scared the Rethugs are about the 2006 results.

  • First they came for the protestors
    and I did not speak out because I was not a protestor.
    Then they came for the liberals
    and I did not speak out because I was not a liberal.
    Then they came for the media
    and I did not speak out because I was not a journalist.
    Then they came for me
    and I pretended to be an idiot.
    So they let me join the Republican party.

  • I got to thinking about this the other day. I think Bush won’t permit dissent because he can’t defend his indefensible positions. His options are limited to snarling, going ballistic, changing the subject, saying something nonsensical, or reciting the same old talking points.

  • I watched the House of Commons last night on C-SPAN. The difference between Blair facing PM’s question time and Bush avoiding facing anyone who differs from the GOP’s Little Red State Book is… well, it’s depressing. Parliament looks fun and Blair looks and sounds like someone who can govern. Bush more and more looks like a retarded kid some jokesters maliciously set up as Class President, with the President slowly realizing that… something’s…. not quite… right.

  • In America at least…

    We may not like what you have to say, but we will fight to protect your freedom to say it…

    (or something like that…)

  • How is this happening? Why is this allowed? Why isn’t the First Amendment the First Thing we demand our government acknowledge?

    Why are everyday citizens cheerleading the demolition of the the Bill of Rights? How can they be so ready to surrender it?

    It’s getting scary, really scary. People, speak now! While you can!

  • Who wants to go see Bush anyway? We already know he can’t answer any questions that he has not rehearsed for days. The bubble is shameful because there are so many ready to defend it. One wonders what is in the heads of cops sometimes. Bravo to the educators who are not willing to comply but are asking for relief from the courts. They are saving our republic as we speak. I hope they have funding because those lawsuits are very pricey. Is there a donation site CB?

  • Every time someone who has strong Authoritarian impulses/lust for power gets in government this is the result. I’m reminded eerily of Huey Long’s stump speeches during the height of his power where dissenters didn’t dare speak while Huey spoke out of fear for their lives.

    At least Huey hated Big Business though.

  • Don’t forget Tim Walz. Hell, a good part of the reason he got into the House race down in MN-1 was what he and two of his high school students experienced the day they took a Bush campaign bus to go see the President when George visited Mankato, Minnesota.

    They were denied admittance and ordered back on the bus, ostensibly because one of the kids had a John Kerry sticker on his wallet. After a rather heated discussion, Tim was allowed to stay. His two students were sent home.

    Couple weeks later, Tim announced for the House seat down there. As a Democrat.

  • Would the next person who plans to do something like this please take a camcorder with them? A few minutes’ footage on You-Tube of “clean decent Americans” (in Orrin Hatch’s wonderful phrase) getting roughed up and arrested for wearing the wrong t-shirt would do way more for free speech than a thousand irate blog posts.

  • #11 – Can’t agree more. We need video of the Bushbots caught in the act of manhandling average Americans away from an “open” Bush event.

  • A sad commentary —

    A colleague of mine here in Iowa who happens to read CBR saw this post and promptly asked the perfect question: “had you heard anything about this locally?”

    And in fact, I had not. So I went to Google News. Out of 4 pages of entries, only 4 were from Iowa, none were the major daily newspapers, none were posted prior to this week.

    The lawsuit by the Cedar Rapids women was filed April 19th. There have been significant activities in the case. Almost totally under the radar here in Iowa.

    As she so aptly chided, “damned liberal media.”

  • The bubble-boy is a sick joke. He’s afraid of old ladies with Kerry buttons.

    But let’s not forget that our side also has a bubble problem, to a degree. Remember the “first amendment zone” at the 2004 Democratic National convention?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_speech_zone

    Not saying Bush’s bubble isn’t a LOT worse, but there’s lots of bubbles to go around. Let’s make sure we pop ours too.

  • This happened in Setember, 2004.

    There’s still no excuse for this anti-democratic policy but the arrests were not recent occurrences.

  • Well I guess the president was too much of a coward (or maybe frequenting too many bars) to go to Vietnam and he’s too much of a coward to face Americans who disagree with him. Call him what you want, but he’s been consistent.

  • Isn’t it funny how all these remarks are left on this page about bush , whe if and when the tables ever get turned your liberal leaders will be right there doing the same thing your pissing and moaning about! hey dks , where was good old Billy Clinton during Vietnam?????

  • And George W. Bush and his cronies still insist on exporting their form of “democracy”? When average Americans are arrested for showing a peaceful form of dissent, I would no longer consider that a democracy. Is Bush so insecure, knowing his policies are indefensible, that he cannot condone any form of democratic, peaceful dissent? Shame on him and those who back him!

  • As you say in the post, this was a Bush campaign event, so it’s not recent. In fact, the article says it happened in September 2004. So while outrageous, it’s not evidence that the bubble lives.

  • Wow Chris, you managed to cobble together one of the most inarticulate and idiotic posts I have read all day.

    No, our “liberal leaders” will NOT use the same gestapo tactics to curtail civil liberties like freedom of speech and the right to peacably assemble. As much crap as Clinton got from you subhuman mouth breathers did he ever set up “free speech zones” or make American citizens sign “loyalty oaths”? Dictators demand loyalty from their citizens NOT Presidents! My loyalty is to America NOT whichever transient happens to occupy the oval office, and given the disloyal actions of this president, I am more convinced of the rightness of that position more than ever.

    Your “where was Clinton” bit was a pathetic afterthought and it shows. Was this discussion ABOUT Vietnam? I mean you only serve to remind us how Cokey McBoozalot managed to get daddy to wrangle him a spot in the TANG and then how he rarely showed his smirking face. Are you sure you want to bring up Clinton’s lack of service?

  • CHRIS,
    Good Lord, you moron. Google- While Dubya was shoveling coke up his nose, Clinton was studying at OXFORD University, I think as a Rhoads Scholar.
    One of the most prestigious scholarships a student can get, studying at one of the best Universities in the world for the last 500 years. Bush was a drunk asshole with a rich daddy and a monkey on his back.
    Nice comparison, douche.
    As far as the cameras go, the SS would never allow footage of one of these illegal arrests to get out. Memory cards confiscated, and they keep you confined so they can check you for hidden cameras and wires.
    FASCISTS, plain and simple. The GOP finds the controlling fist of fascism comforting.

  • Those officers have violated their oaths and betrayed their countries. In ancient Japan, the only way to regain their honor would be to commit ritual suicide.

    Sometimes I see the value of that tradition.

  • Hey Chris,
    When we DO regain control, we WILL make sure we perform strip searches of your fucks every damn day. ANd twice sometimes. Yup.

    As for what to do now, you have to go in stealthfully, in droves, and be in distant locales. Then spring to life coincidentally, and take out a few of these Sons of bitch Secret service assholes.
    YOu know they are no sworn to uphold the Constitution. THEY are the reason that this country has been taken over. Look up their mandate. They are to protect Der Fuhrer, and nothing about the Constitution. This whole fight with the intelligence branches will only come to finality when the true Police of the government (FBI ) is given fianl and total control over any and ALL policing of Citizens and the Secret Service is shut down as the SS it truly is. If they do not identify themselves (which they typically do not), they you can consider them as attacking you, so go for their throats, and fuck them royally.

  • If a Democrat is ever elected President, again, I hope to God s/he has the acumen and guts to purge the Secret Service. Fire the top officials, and deprive them of their pensions. Better form a grand jury, and indict and convict.

    When police officers go to jail for this b.s., we’ll see change.

  • A few commentors mentioned “free speech zones” and I got to wondering if national conventions don’t fall into a different category. Neither party wants to see anything like the 68 fiasco in Chicago, and at least in theory, a free speech zone is just a restriction on where free speech can occur — not a denial of the right. It seems similar to needing a permit to stage a protest (something I never quite understood, but society seems to have accepted) Even though the police were blamed for Chicago, large numbers of protestors and the heavy TV coverage at those events present special problems.

    The incidents in these lawsuits, where individuals are harrassed without having disrupted anything, are altogether different. It’s the domestic equivalent of pre-emptive war, and feels a lot like prosecution for a thought-crime.

  • “a free speech zone is just a restriction on where free speech can occur”

    as I understand it, there is usually viewpoint discrimination going on, in the designation of “free speech zones”.

    Supporters of the President are not asked to take it outside, behind a fence, in the “Free Speech Zone”. Free speech in favor of Dear Leader is accorded all the conveniences.

  • If the free speech zone is a tiny enclosure surrounded by high fences, far from the area where attendees and the media are, then it certainly is a denial of the right of free speech. “Free speech” doesn’t mean the right to talk to yourself.

  • A free speech zone as a concept is certainly disturbing, and walling people off in a fence reeks of putting animals in cages. I guess what I was wondering aloud, was, is a political convention akin to a private party, where the host has some say over who can come in? And from a practical (or security) standpoint, where are the bounds of the party? A convention just seems a very different situation from a public event where the President is appearing in the capacity of President.

  • I agree that the Secret Service actions are ridiculous and un-American but please don’t fall into the same spin game as the Republicans that do these things. Read the story. This incident in Cedar Rapids happened in September 2004. Therefore, it is not a case of the “bubble” continuing (it does continue, as you state, but this case is not the evidence to use). Please correct your facts. Why the AP is pushing this now, almost 2 years later, and not then is the real question.

  • Bush doesn’t even come to Seattle to speak; only to the ‘burbs to shill for $1000 a plate fundraisers – guess you can’t ask questions when your mouth is full.

  • Comments are closed.