An ‘anti-incumbent mood’

A new Washington Post/ABC News poll includes plenty of predictable results — Bush is still unpopular, the war in Iraq is still considered a mistake, Dems enjoy a double-digit lead on the generic ballot, etc. — but there was one number that stood out as unusual.

For months, if not years, public opinion about Congress has stood at a much lower rate than voters’ opinions of their own member of Congress. People have been disgusted by the institution, but when asked about the lawmaker representing them, the vast majority was satisfied.

Even this is beginning to change.

Most Americans describe themselves as being in an anti-incumbent mood heading into this fall’s midterm congressional elections, and the percentage of people who approve of their own representative’s performance is at the lowest level since 1994, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll. […]

Especially worrisome for members of Congress is that the proportion of Americans who approve of their own representative’s performance has fallen sharply. Traditionally, voters may express disapproval of Congress as a whole but still vote for their own member, even from the majority party. But 55 percent now approve of their lawmaker, a seven-percentage-point drop over three months and the lowest such finding since 1994, the last time control of the House switched parties.

“That’s dramatic,” said Republican consultant Ed Rollins, who was White House political director under President Ronald Reagan.

Sure, in an environment in which most voters loathe Congress, it’s still a little odd that 55% approve of their own representative, but that’s the lowest the number has been since … wait for it … late October 1994, which was about a week before something fairly dramatic happened to the congressional landscape.

Indeed, 53% of respondents consider themselves anti-incumbent, while 29% said they are inclined to re-elect congressional candidates — which is “almost precisely the same percentages as in June 1994.”

The other noteworthy result from the poll deal with Iraq and national security.

* Which political party, the (Democrats) or the (Republicans), do you trust to do a better job handling (ITEM)?

The situation in Iraq — Democrats 43%, Republicans 40%

The U.S. campaign against terrorism — Democrats 46%, Republicans 38%

The preference for Dems on Iraq isn’t new (in fact, the party’s lead on the question has shrunken a bit), but an eight-point gap in the Dems’ favor on handling the war on terrorism is a welcome surprise.

Asked what will be the single most important issue in their vote for Congress this year, people ranked Iraq and the economy as tied for number one, followed by gas prices, health care, terrorism, and immigration, in that order. Of those six issues, are there any that look good for Republicans?

If Americans had brains, they would know that the Republicans suck at all those issues, no matter what kind of massive smear campaign they launched against the Democrats.

But if Americans had brains, they wouldn’t still believe a) that we found WMDs in Iraq when we invaded and b) that Saddam and Osama were buddies.

The problem is that people without brains can create their own realities, and in those realities, Republicans are often better at all the issues named.

I hope the polls are right, in that case the grim reality we live with may have indeed penetrated the concrete craniums of Joe and Jane Sixpack, to the point where they’ll vote for change. But as someone else said, with God and Diebold, anything is possible.

  • I think most House incumbents enjoy local approval because they go off to DC, keep their heads down, and stay out of the headlines. It’s when incumbent party leadership runs far afoul of the American mood, that we get to the ‘Throw all the bums out’ mindset.
    It’s become all too clear that the repubs are not only willing to rubber stamp every wish from an unpopular president, they’ll insult and attack anyone who disagrees. This puts them in the dicey position of insulting the majority of the electorate. This can work if they can fire people up and distract them with silly wedge issues.

    So, while the average American is pinched by stagnant wages, out of control fuel and health care costs, the repubs give sweetheart deals to the energy and pharmaceuticals – All the while, lecturing us about the evils of gay marriage. When average Americans see a war that’s gone horribly wrong, and getting worse by the day, repubs scream about the need to protect the flag and the Pledge of Allegiance.
    So in the spirit of all of the advice repubs are giving us on Lieberman, I’d like to offer some in return. A motto that reflects the realities of the modern GOP: Today’s GOP: Defending your values while we pick your pockets.

  • It seems a little obvious but if the Republicans and the incumbants were good at dealing with “Iraq and the economy as tied for number one, followed by gas prices, health care, terrorism, and immigration” they would not be the top issues on the minds of voters.

    There has been nothing at all standing in the way of Republicans for 5 years and we are currently experiencing the results of their policies and style of goverment. The cannot govern, they can only whine and spew rhetorical talking points. Good riddance.

  • people ranked Iraq and the economy as tied for number one, followed by gas prices, health care, terrorism, and immigration, in that order. Of those six issues, are there any that look good for Republicans?

    Iraq — we can’t just cut and run, of course
    the economy — would be worse if we hadn’t got that tax cut
    gas prices — would be worse if we hadn’t gone to Iraq
    health care — imagine if those Democrats gave us the long waiting periods of Canada
    terrorism — the Republicans have kept us safe since 9/11
    immigration — the Democrats would turn those criminals into citizens!

    They all look good for Republicans, so long as (like way too much of the electorate) you can’t be bothered to pay any attention whatsoever.

  • Sounds as though it’s time the Democrats came out with something like the late-1994 “Contract for America” — a sweeping set of reforms which most Americans want. Hint: forget the establishment/incumbent Democrats and the DLC, and don’t release the document on a Friday afternoon.

  • I thought the DNC blew it by not running an ad like I am about to describe in the run-up to 2004 – and gas prices were lower then than now.

    [show sped-up footage of gas station sign with prices being changed and changed again, always up, up, up, interspersed with the occasional newspaper headline about Oil Hits Record High]

    Voiceover: Your drive to work. Your family vacation. The price of food, heat and lights. All of them are hit by rising gas prices. Shouldn’t your government be doing something to help?

    [images of Cheney and Halliburton, typing on screen notes that Cheney was CEO of Halliburton, the worlds largest oil field services corporation; images of Bush and his Arbusto and Harken energy companies, typing on screen notes that he ran them and both came under legal investigations]

    Voiceover: Of course, the Republican government is run by two oil industry insiders [switch to headlines of current oil company profits]. Expecting them or their party to help — that’s like having the fox guard the hen house. They’d rather help their rich old friends.

    [show phots of Enron (probably not Ken Lay at this point), WorldCom, Bush with Abrhamoff, fat old white guys smoking stogies with captions of who they are and what they were convicted of]

    Voiceover: The Republicans may not care about the price of gas or what it does to you and me [show Hastert trading off his hybrid for a Hummer after the energy bill press conference; Ahnold in his Hummer with his Cigar] Maybe its time we elected someone who did. [show some recognizable Dem faces standing with ordinary Americans]

    Vote for Change. Vote for the Issues that Really Matter in America.
    Vote for Democrats. November 7, 2006.

  • Zeitgeist,

    how ’bout you and I start a advertising company? We’ll hire Mr. Carpetbagger for biz dev/outreach and some creative folks and start making these ads. We just gotta get funding from Soros or someone. We make the ads with little cutouts for the names and pictures of Dem candidates. Whaddysay? (okay, I admit that I don’t actually know Soros or any other big funding source…its still a good idea, though…)

  • Comments are closed.