Losing the linchpin

The conventional wisdom was so widely believed, there hardly seemed any point in questioning it. The alleged [tag]terrorist[/tag] plot would be a political boon for the [tag]Bush[/tag] [tag]White House[/tag], the timing would hurt Democrats, and the story had the ability to completely reshape the last 12 weeks of the campaign cycle.

Since the story captured the nation’s attention, however, seven national [tag]polls[/tag] have been conducted. If there was a bump for Bush, it’s hiding well.

* Zogby: the president’s job [tag]approval[/tag] rating dropped from 36% to 34%.

* Gallup: his approval rating fell from 40% to 37%.

* CBS News: the president’s support remained flat at 36%.

* Newsweek: Bush’s approval rating improved to 38% from 35%.

* Fox News: the president’s support remained flat at 36%.

* AP/Ipsos: his approval rating fell from 36% to 33%.

* Harris: the president’s support remained flat at 34%.

In six of the seven national polls, the president’s support dropped or remained the same since Americans heard about the alleged terrorist plot. In other words, the story that would obviously help Bush’s standing isn’t helping him at all.

I think we’ve reached a point in which hitting the panic button simply no longer works to the Republicans’ benefit.

I don’t doubt that people are still worried about terrorist attacks, but for years now, it’s been a given that any time the nation turned its attention to the possibility of a threat, Bush would benefit. For reasons that I’ve never been able to appreciate, Americans trusted the president on this issue, even when they distrusted him on everything else.

With this in mind, Rove & Co. saw this as a trump card, to be played at politically convenient times. It led to, among other things, repeated instances in which the administration raised the terror alert level during the presidential campaign, even when the director of Homeland Security believed the threats were based on flimsy evidence.

It appears increasingly clear, however, that the trump card has been played a few too many times — and it’s lost its effectiveness. Americans were confronted last week with what was billed as the biggest terrorist plot since 9/11, and they largely decided that they approve of the president a little less than they did before.

I don’t know for sure whether last week’s threat was legitimate or hyped, but in either case, it was supposed to be a reminder to all of us that we have a commander-in-chief who knows to combat terrorism. Unfortunately for Republicans, fewer and fewer Americans actually believe this.

Eventually, it starts hurting more than it helps. It just reminds everyone that Bush can’t stop terrorists. Or, if people pay a bit more attention, they realize the threats are being hyped for political reasons, which is worse.

Boy cry wolf, too many times to the well, pick your metaphor. The good news is, if this one stops working for them, the goopers got nuthin.’

  • It was a success – completely took the media Joe-mentum away from Lamont’s victory – no news cycle spent talking about how the American people are turning away from Bush and how Democratic politicians can succcessfully capitalize on it. Instead lots of talk about fear and how Bush’s ratings are supposedly getting a boost (the fact that they aren’t isn’t really registering as a media story, is it? Just a reminder of how the Bushies can control the media and the agenda.

    Sure the American people can show the media-types a thing or two come November, but if they do, it will be a complete surprise and not because the national media discussion was ever allowed to be about the failure of Bushism.

  • I think two things are going on. First, I think people are beginning to disassociate Bush from combating terror — that some part of the government is working on foiling plots, but Bush is just a spectator and a broken record.

    Second, there seems to be more open criticism of Bush, both in editorials and reporting that is identifying Bush weakness and failures. And I think some of the mud is sticking to the Republicans in general.

    Bush and the Bullhorn was the moment that made George the Leader and wartime president. The reason, I think, that Americans were grasping for straws at that time, and that he’s been the only game in town — a man in a position to actually do something. The Democrats, and even the whole congress, haven’t been seen as being in a position to do anything. Irrational as his moves have been, he’s made noise, which translates into a perception of action.

  • You can feel the change, from the way the media reported the bombing scare, to the ineffectual rant from Cheney. Those tools just aren’t working. You can hear the chatter, “What does the war have to do with England/Pakistani bombers”.
    The American people are whipping out their calculators and realizing that 2+2 does not equal 5.

    The really ironic thing is that if the bomb scare was very unorganized, it really hurt Bush because they came out right away and said it was Al-Qaeda. They should have pointed their finger at some other group because the word Al-Qaeda only reminds us that Osama is still roaming the earth and still plotting. It reminds them that Bush has not stopped the world’s #1 most wanted man.
    king.

  • Maybe the general public finally realized that there is no connection between Iraq and potential terror threats to the US. The Republicans said they would keep us safer and its the Brits that have actually stepped-up to the plate (unless that’s all a sham as well.)

  • Alibubba:

    The reason, I think, that Americans were grasping for straws at that time, and that he’s been the only game in town — a man in a position to actually do something.

    Yep.

    The general public really had little leverage.
    Most simply choose to believe that the POTUS was an upright honest man who would protect them.

    That “Our Father Who Art In Washington” might actually be a demonstrable dummy and a demon… was an option most people would rather not entertain.

    The POTUS, like “GOD” always gets the benefit of the doubt.

    With one huge difference: The People can endure endless hurricanes as God working in his mysterious ways… but ultimately, their patience will run out with mere mortals who stutter and stumble and slur and spit…

  • “For reasons that I’ve never been able to appreciate, Americans trusted the president on this issue….”

    I think the Texass cowboy (on a “ranch” with no cows) has morphed back into the disgusting 60-year-old frat-rat he’s always been, and the public can finally smell him for what he is. Can anyone say “Barb and Pappy’s little wimp”?

  • petorado’s observation on the Brits is a good one. In this case, Blair may have become Bush, but the only real successes in nabbing and convicting al queda members and other terrorists have been in Europe. Slowly, that fact may damage the War President as time goes by.

    It’s probably an illusion, but it seems things are rapidly caving in on Bush. In addition fecklessness in the Mideast — a combination of Lebanon, Iran, and worse and worse news from Iraq — there’s gas prices, debt, privacy threats, unrest in the press, the ridiculous Department of Homeland Security and so many more. By the mid-terms, there may be sudden Bush collapse. It will help if the Democrat’s signs on becoming vertebrates is for real.

    I just don’t think the smears and excuses will work much longer.

  • There was a story in the paper this morning that the CIA is “ramping up” its efforts to get Osama Bin Laden. How predictable. Big whoop.

    If they really wanted him, they could have gotten him by now. Any questions?

  • One idea: in order to “sell the fear,” the GOP had to convince Americans of how scared they should be, because of how terrible and scary the big bad terrorists were (and they were probably right, for the first 30 seconds).

    But just because people bought into how bad things were doesn’t mean they’ll be happy to stay afraid. Thus, what was once a good political strategy can become a massive liability.

    Of course, the “party of one really bad idea” can’t change tune now. So either the Dems grow up and take the wheel from the baby, or we drive off the cliff to fascism.

  • There was a story in the paper this morning that the CIA is “ramping up” its efforts to get Osama Bin Laden. How predictable. Big whoop.

    If they really wanted him, they could have gotten him by now. Curmudgeon

    For all we know, they have him on ice, ready to “unveil” him on Oct 31st. The next “foiled plot/victory” will have to be both bigger than the one last week and to happen very close to the elections, so that people react, without having the time to think.

  • Think of the biggest, juiciest target that these warmongers want—and the “October Surprise” will be irrefutable evidence that ObL is there. Iran, anyone? After all, the Reich blogs have been laying the groundwork for months now—and the GOP, fearful of an ever-waning grip on power, is desperate for their “gargantuan struggle….”

  • “Think of the biggest, juiciest target that these warmongers want—and the “October Surprise” will be irrefutable evidence that ObL is there. Iran, anyone?” – Steve

    If everyone forgets that, again, the Sunni and Shia are not bosum buddies. Iran is a Shite country, and they frankly hate Osama bin Laden and all his Sunni cronies. There may be al Qaeda in Iran, but they are more like hostages for ObL’s good behavior than guests. I’m sure Iran will not turn them over to Boy George II if he asks, but it doesn’t mean they are allies.

    ObL is in Pakistan, a nicely secure Sunni majority country where the Sunnis regularly murder Shia.

    Of course, the Bushites may be betting on the fact that most Americans are as ignorant as Boy George II (“I thought they are all Muslims”). Of course, the fact that Boy George II, supposedly an evangelical Methodist, goes to a liberal Espiscopalian church on (some) Sunday might mean that he just doesn’t understand that all the Great Abrahamic Religions are devided into militantly conflicted sects.

  • wolf.

    wolf.

    wolf.

    Wolf.

    Wolf.

    Wolf!

    Hello, is this thing on? Wolf!

    WOLF!
    HEY, LOOK, WOLF, WOLF OVER THERE!

    Howcome its now working anymore?

  • Yup. They cried wolf one too many times. That and the fact that the arrests had fuck-all nothing to do with United States security apparatus. I’m sure we gave an assist where we could, but this show was run by the Brits.

    Did Tony Blair get a bump?

  • This is a dangerous line for the the All Terror All The Time Party: the point at which the Emperor’s nakedness begins to be widely perceived. The next step after the clear-eyed child pointing and laughing at the nude Emperor is open ridicule and mockery by the citizenry, and a complete inability to govern.

    This can make the henchmen panicky — beware the October Surprise.

  • Ford motors announced a campaign to terrorize the American jobs payroll, part of an ongoing crusade of outsourcing. The reduction of american workforce jobs continues on record pace.

    Bush is a terrorist when it comes to protecting your jobs.

  • Cheney’s insane antics – calling Lamont the terrorist candidate, or whatever – show the absolute desperation coming from Camp Rove. I honestly felt sorry for Cheney, for a brief moment… it was like watching a senile old uncle repeat a joke he just told five minutes ago to the same audience. It’s come down to the third of the country who will never be able to admit they were wrong (not just a conservative disease, mind you, but part of the human condition) and continue to love Bush, and the rest of the country, who are praying that this whole ‘election process’ thing actually functions properly in November.

    Why can’t millions of dollars be enough? Why can’t our government be honest with us? Sigh.

  • The so-called terrorists in London,many were without passports to travel,had no plane tickets,had no bomb materials when rounded up,except some Dove Liquid Dish Soap and some hair gel in a tube! After 28 days Blair has to charge them or let them go.Big Bad-ass Bust,Bush!

  • “The so-called terrorists ” Pee Wee

    “‘Martyr videos’ of the type left by suicide bombers, were reportedly discovered on at least six laptops owned by some of the 23 suspects being questioned in the foiled airline terror plot.”
    http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/crime/article1220347.ece

    “no plane tickets” Pee Wee

    “United Airline tickets dated next Wednesday were found by police at the home of one of the raided addresses.”
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=400114&in_page_id=1770&ct=5

    “…no bomb materials” Pee Wee

    “Police investigating the alleged terrorist plot to blow up transatlantic flights found a suitcase yesterday containing items which could be used to make a bomb.

    The BBC reported that the discovery was made during a search in King’s Wood, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire. The corporation reported a police source as saying the suitcase contained “everything you would need to make an improvised device”. ”
    http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/crime/article1220094.ece

  • I flew cross country last Friday (the day after the news from London) and returned on Sunday. I was very surprised at the reactions I overheard regarding the “no liquids, no gels” rule. I expected passenger in general to support the rule, just as they have supported other increased security measures since 9/11. But instead I heard lots of grumbling about the new rules and the way in which they are forcing many people to check baggage instead of using carry-on bags.

    Why is this relevant to this thread? I think people in general no longer give the government credibility on this issue and feel comfortable now complaining about the see-saw screening policies. This can’t be good for The Decider’s credibility.

  • Should liberals think more before they speak/write? The stats you quote are little changed, which could simply be the result of the margin of error (usually +/-3%) for these “surveys”. In addition, if the drop is real, then it could be related to something completely other than the terror story. Ever heard of controlling for other factors? Example: The price of gas or other economic event, such as the decline in U of M’s consumer confidence index could be responsible for the drop instead.

    Little knowledge + blog = Very Dangerous

  • it’s 2 things

    the war in iraq going sour

    the poor economy (high gas prices, high home prices, high mortgages, lower wages, etc, etc…

    telling people that bush isn’t getting “credit” for this “good” economy is not going to cut it. the wages are not keeping up with the std. of living

  • Iraq is causing more trouble than first conceived, but that’s no reason to leave. Apparently it’s in our interest to be there or we wouldn’t be there. When you failed an exam in school did you a) give up because you think you’ll never improve or b) redouble your efforts to do better next time? Me thinks today’s politcal whiners chose a.

    Gas prices were higher in the 70’s than today. In fact, the price of gas as a share of income has fallen by almost half since a few decades ago. High home prices are a concern reflecting demand and the recent historically low interest rates. Wages could be an issue, but right now I read reports on higher wages rather than lower wages.

  • Mr. Forward:
    Hey! Look! There’s another straw! …& the highest floating one too.

    So sad it still sucks. Keep trying to make shit smell better though, it’s quite entertaining.

    Jim: “Apparently it’s in our interest to be there”
    Don’t you KNOW?

    I’ll SHOW you what’s in our interest: screw the oil and develop many more cars like these
    teslamotors.com
    Put a couple solar panels on top of your garage and no fuel costs at all, with the great bonus of no emissions.

    Republican/Rovian Talking Points + blog comments = a chance to show your true ignorance to the world.

  • Comments are closed.