‘Mission’ impossible

It’s no mystery that the [tag]president[/tag] doesn’t care for press conferences; and it’s no secret why — he’s not very good in this setting. It makes the Q&A fairly painful for everyone — the reporters’ questions are largely ignored, the president’s answers are meandering and broken up by awkward pauses, and viewers learn nothing.

Today’s [tag]press conference[/tag] wasn’t terribly different from any other, but it was interesting to see how [tag]Bush[/tag] responded to Iraq-related questions by reframing every question into a context in which he could repeat the exact same talking point. After a while, it became almost comical.

Asked if it’s time for a “new strategy” in Iraq, Bush said:

“[W]e’re not leaving…. Now, if you say, are you going to change your strategic objective, it means you’re leaving before the mission is complete. And we’re not going to leave before the [tag]mission is complete[/tag].

When the same reporter said the response didn’t answer the question, and re-asked the president if his strategy is working, Bush added:

“There are a lot of good, decent people saying, ‘Get out now; vote for me, I will do everything I can to, I guess, cut off money’ is what they’ll try to do to get our troops out. It’s a big mistake. It would be wrong, in my judgment, for us to leave before the mission is complete in Iraq.”

Asked if he agreed with Dick Cheney’s assessment that Democratic voters may be emboldening al-Qaeda types, Bush said:

“What all of us in this administration have been saying is that leaving Iraq before the mission is complete will send the wrong message to the enemy and will create a more dangerous world. That’s what we’re saying…. [T]here are a lot of people in the Democrat [sic] Party who believe that the best course of action is to leave Iraq before the job is done, period. And they’re wrong. And the American people have got to understand the consequence of leaving Iraq before the job is done. We’re not going to leave Iraq before the job is done, and we’ll complete the mission in [tag]Iraq[/tag].”

Asked what Iraq had to do with 9/11, Bush said, “Nothing,” but added:

“I fully believe it was the right decision to remove Saddam Hussein, and I fully believe the world is better off without him. Now, the question is how do we succeed in Iraq? And you don’t succeed by leaving before the mission is complete, like some in this political process are suggesting.”

Now, there are a couple of things to consider here. First is the fact that all of this may sound absurd while reading the text, but to appreciate just how bizarre it really was, one really has to see the video. It’s worse than you think. (I’m sure C&L and/or YouTube will have it up sometime soon.)

Second, these answers are obviously repetitious and frequently nonsensical, but as Swopa noted a few weeks ago, that’s not because the president is some kind of rambling lunatic who’s too dense to understand the question (though that may be part of it); it’s because Bush isn’t really talking to anyone in the room or watching the whole video.

[The president’s] audience consists of people who are accidentally catching a soundbite on the news while flipping channels, or looking for reassurance while watching Fox News.

I think that’s almost certainly right. Rove & Co. told him beforehand, “Mr. President, go out there and emphasize the importance of ‘completing the mission.’ Our focus groups say people respond well to the phrase.” The president, unimaginative when it comes to answers of his own, followed the instructions carefully.

As a result, every question about Iraq prompted almost the exact same response. Part of this may be because Bush could think of nothing else to say, but just as likely, Bush never knows which answer is going to make the evening news. Better to make them all the same, just to play it safe.

Is the President an idiot?

I think the real question is: Are those folks who blindly supported him for 5+ years now idiots? (we all know the answer.)

Can they save some sort of face? Yes, by throwing the GOP out of Congress in 2006. Will they? Probably not, because they are ignorant idiots.

  • Has anybody asked him lately what “the mission” is? I haven’t gotten around to watching today’s spectacle, but given the snippets I’ve seen quoted in the internets, it seems that, “How would you define the mission?” is an obvious question–perhaps a backdoor approach to Helen’s perennial “Why did we attack Iraq?”

    What is the mission? To end tyranny? To bring peace and security to Iraq? To fight terrorists there so we don’t have to fight them elsewhere (the dirty hospital theory)?

  • Is the President an idiot? Nope, he is a moron. An idoit can’t be trained, but a high functioning moron? Maybe with a little work he could do as good a job as an ex-actor with dimentia. The real question is can the country survive two more years of this Bozo? I think he is comming apart, so I am rather worried.

  • well, keep in mind too that when the major papers cover the story tomorrow, the ledes will read something like ‘president bush vowed to complete the mission in iraq, in a news conference yesterday.’ the conventions of the msm always make him sound more engaged than he is.

  • Stupid me. I thought the mission was already accomplished when “Maverick” Bush landed on the Abe Lincoln some three years ago.

  • Is the President an idiot?
    Yes.

    Is the idiot a president?
    Not so much.

    If it weren’t so French, someone might accuse Bush of having a ‘mission du jour’. Good summary &y.

    &y not?

  • We can’t cut and run, we have to adapt to win and complete the mission.
    Whew.

    &y has it exactly right: the only logical follow-up was “And Mr. President, what exactly is that mission?” And stick with it until you get him boxed in on an answer. Because at this point, there is no “mission” that has a viable basis. WMD? Spread democracy? Stop al Queda? Prop up oil companies? Take a bunch of lower-income, often minority youth and put them in harms way so their otherwiseDem-leaning families suddenly become pro-military R’s?

  • I watched the show live and practically barfed up my Wheaties. Bush looked haunted….cringing….incoherent….lost at sea….and that was before the questions even started.

    It was sadly comical to watch him try to be forceful for the cameras. He’s used up, burned out, nothing left inside except the mindless parroting of the same tired old lines.

    He was nothing but a stage prop to begin with, but now it’s so transparently obvious with him crouching over the podium like it was the only thing holding him up.

    We have to relieve him of the burdens of his office. For his own good as well as ours. He’s never going to hold up physically for two more years at this rate.

  • This stuff happens on the talk shows too. Repubs get their marching orders on the theme for the day —

    –Democrats have no plan
    –We need to stay the course
    –We’re not driven by polls
    –We need to fight them over there, not here
    –It’s a post-9/11 world

    etc. etc.

    and the mouthpiece makes sure to fit it into answers whether it has anything to do with the question or not. Sen. Frist is particularly clumsy and obvious at this. If you flip around the dial any Sunday through the talk shows you’ll hear the same phrase in identical language popping up.

  • I listen to Air America from time to time in my car with the broken FM tuner. They did a bit a couple weeks ago using voice clips of Bush repeating the propaganda. Modified to accommodate today’s Bushisms, it might go something like this…

    “…you don’t succeed by leaving before the mission is complete.”
    “leave before the mission is complete.”
    “before the mission is complete.”
    “before the mission is complete.”
    “Heads On. apply directly to the forehead.”
    “before the mission is complete.”
    “Heads On. apply directly to the forehead.”

  • Curmudgeon:

    “He was nothing but a stage prop to begin with, but now it’s so transparently obvious with him crouching over the podium like it was the only thing holding him up.”

    Yeah well… he may not be very swift holding the handlebars of a podium… but you should see him attack those awe-inspiring 200 foot hills of Crawford on his mountain bike:

    “Aerial assault! Aerial assault! Aerial assault!”

    Apparently… it is enough of a sight to make DC’s corpulent reporters blush in awe…

    So he may be a fat head… but at least he ain’t fat per se.

    ROFLMAO….

  • Rick: What happened to adapt to win?

    the same thing that happened to ‘plan for victory.’ and so much other shite it pains me to remember.

  • Oh, but Bush DID say a few things during the press conference. He confirmed that there were/are no WMDs, that Saddam Hussein and Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, and that the best way “to do hope is through a form of government” – which we are apparently imposing on Iraq with this war, per the NeoCon agenda, with the rational that we are preventing a world (which he encourages us repeatedly to imagine) in which “resentment and the lack of hope create the breeding grounds for terrorists who are willing to use suiciders to kill to achieve an objective.” If we hadn’t deposed Saddam, Bush claims we wouldn’t have to “imagine a world in which you had a Saddam Hussein who had the capacity to make a weapon of mass destruction, who was paying suiciders to kill innocent life”. I think he wants us to imagine these worlds because that’s the only way Bush can come up with a scenario worse than the one he’s created (or might create is he goes forward to “complete the mission”). Imagine how much worse the “suiciders” might be..imagine how much worse the capacity for mass destruction…just keep imagining while I try to dig myself out of this quagmire.. heh heh.

  • We are not leaving until the Iraqis throw us a parade with flowers and kisses. That is the mission.

  • The implant is in an early stage of development. As upgrades come online the performance may improve. This message will autodestruct in

  • We need a mission with an exit strategy. Or at least an exit stratagery.

    I think we need to set one 6 year term for the Presidency. Even the goods one deconstruct after about 5 years. And this is not a good one.

  • The mission is complete… The mission is complete… The mission is complete…

    I guess his handlers have trained him not to say “mission accomplished” ever again!

  • “We are not leaving until the Iraqis throw us a parade with flowers and kisses.”

    And… they must name a square area somewhere in downtown Baghdad: “Bush Freedom Green.”

    Or something like that…

    This is a wartime president who believes himself to be exalted with the likes of Churchill and FDR. Thus he wants a suitable icon in Iraq. Someplace where the rose bushes of ‘hard-working’ democracy can be kept perpetually blooming by the grateful.

    Now only if those damn Iraqi ingrates would comply,
    we could go home awash in the throes of our victory.

    [Aside: No I am not making this up. This is really the sort of sick crap that swirls around in B’s feverish brain. He also has fantazies of winning the Tour de France (if only he were 16 again!)]

  • What’s truly terrifying is what a completed mission will look like. Iraq has been full speed reverse since day one. What’s the objective? No building or person left behind? Or will Bush be satisfied to see Iraqis clad in animal skins, sharpening sticks with stones?

  • Re: #12, I think you may have something there, koreyel. Maybe he crouches over the podium to make him feel like he’s on his bike racing over those Crawford hills instead of facing those nasty reporters who keep confronting him with really hard things, like reality. 😉

  • “he’s not very good in this setting”

    The man is accustomed to being left bruised and bleeding from cutting brush or riding bicycles. And, that’s what he likes to do.

    His proudest achievement is “catching” a stocked fish in an artificial lake.

    Is he good in any setting?

  • We are not leaving until the Iraqis throw us a parade with flowers and kisses. That is the mission.
    –Michael7843853 G-O in 08!

    That’s what he really wants, isn’t it? He’s a walking disaster.

  • What is the mission?
    It is what it always has been for the neocons: establish permanent military bases in Iraq.

  • What is the mission?

    To see Saddam executed for:

    1) attempting to assassinate GHWB,
    2) for taunting GHWB after the 1992 election that Saddam won because he was still in power and GHWB was on the way out.

    Once Saddam is dead, Boy George II can cut and run.

  • I found watching the president unraveling most uncomfortable and chilling. Still, most Americans have no idea that their president is a sham, a fraud. And CNN just reported his latest overall approval rating is 42%! What in God’s name are the people thinking? That’s almost respectable.

    Is it better that Americans just don’t get it? But how can we plow through 2 1/2 more years of this without somebody calling it? It’s so blatantly obvious now, as he crumbles and stumbles before our very eyes in the wake of the mess his handlers have made of the country and the world.

  • I’m into this point Swopa is making: that he’s been programmed to pump soundbites through the media. They know that anyone who’s paying serious attention is already on the other side. As Swopa says, “..it’s bullshit from start to finish..”. But he goes on to say “.. but at least it’s a concise narrative, and for many people it succeeds because the Democrats haven’t come up with a coherent alternative.”

    Granted that was three weeks ago. Now, I think coherent alternatives are being given to Democrats, by the crumbling Repug dynasty itself. Maybe the Democrats can take a leaf from their book while they’re at it, and zombie-down for the Media. ..No, scrub that — bad idea.

    Better: just let them autodestruct. They’re doing a grand job of it and the public see it. All but a few renegades, but who cares about them.

    Is presidential dementia contageous?

  • Actually, the mission is clear: To secure Iraqi oil fields for American oil companies. The mission is clear, they just can’t say what it is, or successfully complete it. But we aren’t leaving until we do. And, yes, it does take an idiot to follow that logic.

  • What’s the frequency, Karl!

    Goldilocks is right. Just let the f****r self-destruct. That’s what’s happening. In a few months, he will be such an embarrassment that his moon-howling base won’t be seen with him.

    I’ve just started “Fiasco.” I don’t recommend it. Much too depressing

  • And here I thought the mission was to topple Saddam, and allow the freedom-loving Iraqis to establish their democratic government. You mean the mission actually includes propping up that government indefinitely? Sounds like “mission creep” to me.

    But really, I’m afraid their true mission is to mess the world up so badly that in the future “america” will be a word for something that starts out really well but later goes horribly, horribly wrong.

  • First of all I am reading the book Fiasco. It is fabulous. I highly recommend it to everyone.

    President George W. Bush has gone through a roller coaster the last six years. He went from a less than 50% victory to a 90% approval rating where he could do no wrong. He could have a press conference and say anything that he wanted in the press sucked it up. Then, shortly after the election of 2004, the tide began to turn. His approval ratings began to drop. Press conferences became more contentious. As more and more evidence has come out about the Bush administration’s incompetence, these press conferences are becoming more and more like a WWF cage match.

    The problem is that it is hard to defend the indefensible. When you say the same thing over and over and over again sooner or later people stop believing you. That is the problem. President Bush does not like to be questioned. He never has. He would like to be able to fall back on the old standbys. He would like to be able to read from a script. Unfortunately, as his approval ratings are stuck in the 30s, the script is not working. All terrorism all the time is not working with the press and is not working with the public either.

    When you think back over the last six years, think about the successes that he kept rolling out. The Republican Congress gave him everything. He had tax cuts, he had no Child left behind. Almost every piece of significant legislation, went his way. Now, six years later, almost nothing is going his way. Everything that he touches is blowing up in his face.

    When you are incompetent and you surround yourself with incompetent ideologues, this is the result.

    This is why we now see the combative and smug President Bush. Is the President Bush that the Republicans tried to suppress during the 2000 election. If only Al Gore ran a better campaign in 2000. Damn.

    Where’s the Outrage?

  • I may be mistaken, but I thought I heard (at about 43:00 into the conference), Bush say that the way to defeat terrorists was to “dispel liberty and freedom.” Now he may have said “spread liberty and freedom” but he was slurring his words so much during the whole thing I could often not tell what the hell he was saying.

  • Last night I watched a bloated alcoholic make fun of himself on ComedyCentral with the Roast of William Shatner. This morning, I watched a dry drunk make an ass of himself.

    The guy is an embarassment to the human race.

  • I keep wanting to leave this alone, get on with other things, leave others to sort this out and have fun, but I can’t. Why? –because I’ve committed myself to read the Conyers Report and every day after three pages I’m steaming, veritably levitating with rage.

    They lied.

    Why mince words? Why be soft on them? Why let them slip the net?

    — They lied. They lied to the American people. They lied to the world community. They lied to their own party. They lied to Congress. They lied, probably, to their own mothers. Why give them any let-up?

    Right yesterday at this news conference the shrub said “We thought they had WMDs, but then we found they hadn’t” Boo-Shite! They didn’t ‘think’, they knew they hadn’t.

    They lied. Give them no mercy. Ten Achillies heels in our sights, at least.

    Sorry, I’ll come down slowly [but no promises I stay down].

  • “Complete the mission?”

    The “mission” never had any military objective to begin with…so why the need for a military mission?

    They were so bent on getting Saddam (remember “shock-and-awe?”) that they violated the Geneva Conventions right from the beginning—and made aggressive war on densely-inhabited population centers.

    They went in, not to liberate the Iraqi people, but to intimidate them. Why else roll an M1-A1 Abrams battle-tank down a neighborhood street? It isn’t a Volkswagen, you know….

    There has been no consistent effort to identify the “former” (yeah—ri-iiiight) Iraqi Army, that just melted into the background, and which is now the probable driving force behind the Sunni side of the civil war (“insurgency” is a Bushism). Tens of thousands of troops in Baghdad, and CNN can get to an attack-scene faster than the Marines. I suppose the old saying about the cavalry always showing up after the massacre is true, even today….

    But the driving force behind this madness, as I see it, isn’t the Neocon. Neither is it the profiteer, nor the hawk. It is the hard-right religious fanatic who, ever more often, is calling for the conversion of Iraq—and the entire planet, for that matter—to “their” version of Christianity. Not just “Christianity,” mind you—but “their” brand of it. They want a base from which to launch their new crusade, and the proof of this is that the “ideology-mongers” of the Reich have continued to blindly and devoutly support this administration. An administration that, by all accounts, has in one way or another broken just about every tenet, law, commandment, code, and ordinance within the pages of the Bible itself. If Dobson and his ilk were so set in their beliefs, then EC would be the straw that breaks the back of the GOP—but it won’t be. The gradual start-up of IRS investigations into “politicizing from the pulpit” would drive fundamentalists and evangelicals alike away from backing the GOP in droves—but it hasn’t.

    Nope—Iraq won’t end anytime soon. Not as long as the Reich has its version of “Christian Jihad….”

  • As stated above – What is the mission.

    If the mission is a flowering liberal democracy in the midle east, we are going to have to be there for 50 years.

  • About “Fiasco” —

    I really DO recommend it. In fact, I wish it were required reading. If it were, Bush would be impeached tomorrow.

    But it IS depressing. Like “Cobra II,” the appalling incompetence and dishonesty of the Bush administration is overwhelming. Unlike “Cobra II,” “Fiasco” digs even deeper into the muck, and addresses the invasion’s aftermath. It’s not a screed. Just a very uncomfortable assembly of outrageous facts.

  • Mahablog has a good round up of how the MSM is playing yesterday’s rambling by W. Shall we say they weren’t impressed anymore than us.

  • Comments are closed.