One year later

Rockey Vaccarella, the Republican activist who drove a “replica” of a FEMA trailer from New Orleans to Washington for a carefully staged photo-op, said victims of Hurricane Katrina should be “happy with what they got.”

Looking at the numbers, they didn’t get much.

* Less than half of the city’s pre-storm population of 460,000 has returned, putting the population at roughly what it was in 1880.

* Nearly a third of the trash has yet to be picked up.

* Sixty percent of homes still lack electricity.

* Seventeen percent of the buses are operational.

* Half of the physicians have left, and there is a shortage of 1,000 nurses.

* Six of the nine hospitals remain closed.

* Sixty-six percent of public schools have reopened.

* A 40 percent hike in rental rates, disproportionately affecting black and low-income families.

* A 300 percent increase in the suicide rate.

Like 9/11, Katrina was supposed to “change everything.” Poverty was supposed to be a front-burner issue again, with the president promising “bold action.” Barriers that keep low-income families, particularly African-American families, from getting ahead would finally get some long-overdue attention. New Orleans would see a rebuilding effort the likes of which we’ve never seen.

But the aftermath and political rhetoric was full of sound and fury signifying nothing.

Frank Rich made a compelling case that Katrina, for Bush’s presidency, was very much the domestic version of Iraq.

The ineptitude bared by the storm — no planning for a widely predicted catastrophe, no attempt to secure a city besieged by looting, no strategy for anything except spin — is indelible. New Orleans was Iraq redux with an all-American cast.

Nowhere is that more true than in the area of lucrative, no-bid contracts, most of which were awarded noncompetitively, wrought with fraud. Congress passed four emergency spending bills to direct more than $110 billion in aid to the Gulf Coast — of which far less than half has been spent. And of the $44 billion that has been spent, House Dems found — stop me if you’ve heard this one — ample “waste, fraud, abuse or mismanagement.”

As Paul Krugman explained, “As the Iraqis learned, allocating money and actually using it for reconstruction are two different things, and so far the administration has done almost nothing to make good on last year’s promises.”

For example, although Congress allocated $17 billion to the Department of Housing and Urban Development for Katrina relief, primarily to provide cash assistance to homeowners, as of last week the department had spent only $100 million. The first Louisiana homeowners finally received checks under a federally financed program just three days ago. Mississippi, which has a similar program, has sent out only about two dozen checks so far.

Local governments, which were promised aid in rebuilding facilities such as fire stations and sewer systems, have fared little better in actually getting that aid. A recent article in The National Journal describes a Kafkaesque situation in which devastated towns and parishes seeking federal funds have been told to jump through complex hoops, spending time and money they don’t have on things like proving that felled trees were actually knocked down by Katrina, only to face demands for even more paperwork.

Apologists for the administration will doubtless claim that blame for the lack of progress rests not with Mr. Bush, but with the inherent inefficiency of government bureaucracies. That’s the great thing about being an antigovernment conservative: even when you fail at the task of governing, you can claim vindication for your ideology.

But bureaucracies don’t have to be this inefficient. The failure to get moving on reconstruction reflects lack of leadership at the top.

Yesterday, returning to the scene of the crime, Bush told reporters in New Orleans that there are “a lot of problems left.” It was, alas, a spectacular understatement.

This imagery seemed to capture the problem perfectly.

Mr. Bush delivered his remarks at an intersection in a working-class Biloxi neighborhood against a carefully orchestrated backdrop of neatly reconstructed homes. Just a few feet out of camera range stood gutted houses with wires dangling from interior ceilings. A tattered piece of crime scene tape hung from a tree in the field where Mr. Bush spoke. A toilet seat lay on its side in the grass.

Perfect.

That photo-op was like the tearing down of Saddam’s statue: the long shot revealed how phony it all was.

I know there must be a parallel — this is the Bush Crime Family we’re talking about, and they’re not very imaginative — but I haven’t seen any dirt as yet on the “no-bid contracts”. Where is the equivalent of Halliburton (aka Cheney Corp)?

  • The failure to get moving on reconstruction reflects lack of leadership at the top.

    DING! DING! DING! We have a winnah!

    The reason I think so many of us were pissed was that we expect our leaders to act as such.

    Every time I read/hear someone on the right asserting that “Bush didn’t cause the flooding! He can’t control a hurricane!” I simply bring up the point that while the city flooded, Bush as eating cake with John McCain and playing guitar with some hilljack redneck.

    But just like everything else with this administration, the buck stops somewhere else.

  • Like 9/11, Katrina was supposed to “change everything.”

    Sure as hell changed New Orleans. Change doesn’t have to be for the better.

  • I wonder why we have to read about the rest of the photo. Why didn’t the camera that was filming Bush speak in front of the houses simply swing around as he spoke.(Or have an inset from a second camera) Like they say a picture is worth a lot of words. That would be the balance news orgs are so fond of. Presumbably these events are filmed by so-called journalists.

    I wonder if Bush even secretly watches documentaries like Moore and Spike Lee have made.

  • from the NYT article:
    “It will probably have fewer poor people; its housing projects remain essentially closed, and many poorer neighborhoods are still devastated. With inexpensive housing scarce and not being built, partly because of the paralysis in recovery planning, it is easier for the middle class than the poor to return. ”

    There you go, Lebensraum, Bush-style

  • And bless Frank Rich for telling us about the scene just out of view of the cameras. Why why oh why don’t these sheep in the press turn their cameras in that direction? Yes, you came for the carefully staged photo-op press conference, but nothing prevents you from filming more than that.

    On last night’s NBC retrospective of Katrina Brian WIlliams said a couple of times that this was the story that caused the mass media to “find its voice” and challenge the status quo. Really? Why, because you asked a couple of tough questions to some bumbling idiot like “Brownie”? Where has that journalistic voice gone now – a year later?

    In truth, Katrina should have spawned dozens of new Cindy Sheehans, who have nowhere permanent to live and so they camp out in Crawford waiting to ask their “leader” why he won’t help. Or better yet, right in Lafayette Park in DC.

  • In my mind, and this goes back to last year when I was sitting in a Houston hotel lobby a couple days after the storm with my wife, her parents, her brother and his extended family, along with a number of St. Bernard Parish residents, all of us not knowing whether we would have homes to go back to, jobs, anything, the one piece of “imagery” that sticks out most came when listening to one of the St. Bernard residents on the phone with a relative who was back in St. Bernard, a police officer, and the relative informed her that the Canadian Mounted Police had just arrived. No US troops of any kind. No National Guardsmen. But the Canadian Mounties. And this after watching hours upon hours of footage showing a city that was left to fend for itself with no help for almost a week, a city that was, for all intents and purposes, accessible (the airport runways were clear, the roads along the river into the city from the west were not flooded). Everyone there in the lobby knew at that time that this was going to be one really rough recovery and that they would likely have to do most of the recovery work themselves if they were to return to St. Bernard. It was incompetence laid bare. It felt very strange. Very troubling. And most of these folks, from St. Bernard Parish, knew they would probably never go home again, a place that had been home to many of their families for close to 100 years.

    And Rockey thinks they should be happy with what they got.

    I certainly would like to see how his fellow citizens have responded to his return. Maybe he was greeted with rose petals, sort of like a liberator.

    On another note, I truly feel, had the government provided the option of housing vouchers in addition to trailors, that the problems associated with people returning, rental rates, etc. would have been largely overcome.

  • “That’s the great thing about being an antigovernment conservative: even when you fail at the task of governing, you can claim vindication for your ideology.’ – Paul Krugman

    That about says it all. Republican’ts, can’t understand why we get so upset when they fail.

  • Unfortunately, the horrible losses from Katrina have been exacerbated by the rampant fraud through which a wide variety of scammers, both large and small, have been defrauding FEMA at the expense of taxpayers. Every citizen should be made aware, that if they learn of someone defrauding FEMA, or any other agency of the federal government, they may personally file a claim to recover triple the amount defrauded, and they typically get to keep up to 30$ of the money as a reward. To learn how, and to read about every major case of this type in the last ten years, anyone can go to http://www.federalfraud.com

  • Unfortunately, the horrible losses from Katrina have been exacerbated by the rampant fraud through which a wide variety of scammers, both large and small, have been defrauding FEMA at the expense of taxpayers. Every citizen should be made aware, that if they learn of someone defrauding FEMA, or any other agency of the federal government, they may personally file a claim to recover triple the amount defrauded, and they typically get to keep up to 30% of the money as a reward. To learn how, and to read about every major case of this type in the last ten years, anyone can go to http://www.federalfraud.com

  • It’s always “a carefully orchestrated backdrop” herr Bush; showing the disaster that is still the aftermath of Katrina would pop the Bubble—and then everyone would see beyond the smoke and mirrors, discovering the tiny little man behind the curtain. They’d wake up, as if from a dream, to realize that not only their government has forsaken the nation—but that the MSM has played the role of “chief enabler” to this current edition of “Reich.”

    Why do you think that the Coulters; the Limbaughs; the O’Reillys, Hannitys, and Matthewses of the media are screaming louder than ever before? It’s because they know full well that the only way for them to remain in their lofty positions is to reinforce the Valhalla-esque fantasy that is Herr Bush’s Amerika. In their eyes, bursting the bubble is tantamount (now) to a death sentence; thus, they do not even consider rocking the boat. And sadly, the rest of the media falls in line. Case in point—why didn’t the story show a second photo of the area? Why were all the cameras willfully herded into one tiny area like mindless little sheep, with none daring to “pan” the lens around to show the “Truth” of New Orleans?

    Pick just a few of these outfits—groups that weren’t always Bushite Lapdogs—and start hitting them with questions. Hard, honest questions about their integrity as honest representatives of the Truth. Sooner or later, one or two of them will turn back—and the hissing sound that accompanies that turn? Why—it’s the Bubble….

  • “But just like everything else with this administration, the buck stops somewhere else.”

    Unholy Moses is right, but it doesn’t seem to get to New Orleans.

  • I had to turn off the news last night because I just couldn’t take it anymore. I couldn’t stand seeing those people waiting on the tops of their houses praying the helicopter would come their way and when it finally did I couldn’t stand watching them leave family members and pets behind.

    I couldn’t stand seeing it look the same way now as it did a year ago.

    I couldn’t stand knowing that people still support the criminal whose series of mistakes and calous uncaring indifference has harmed New Orleans and the rest of the world in grevious and irreparable ways.

    All I can do is think of November and hope.

  • Hey folks, don’t be so negative.
    Buisines is booming in the casinos in Biloxi. Now were talking carpetbaggers!

    Seriously though, I want to thank you commenters and bloggers for a different slant on all things newsworthy.

  • I will give Samwise the benefit of the doubt and assume he is joking, because surely no one can really be that uninformed. Sure, a portion of New Orleans is below sea level, but it was developed after the U.S. Corps of Engineers designed and built a levee system that was supposed to protect the areas below sea level — which design proved to be faulty of course. The oldest parts of the city — the French Quarter, CBD, Audubon Park, Tulane — are all above sea level, as demonstrated by their lack of flooding. There are other areas just barely above sea level that flooded due to the surge that came in with Katrina.

    But if anyone really did take Samwise’s argument seriously (and those of us in New Orleans hear it more than we care to), you can turn it around on just about any area in the U.S.: “Why would anyone live in California as it is just going to be leveled by an earthquake at any time?” or “Why would anyone live in the midwest as a tornado could blow away your house at any time?”

    Best rant on this subject is the comparison of the recent flooding in Pennsylvania to New Orleans by wizbang: http://wizbangblog.com/2006/06/28/where-are-the-calls-to-abandon-pennsylvania.php

    One suggestion CB: I would avoid equating sycophants with activists. I don’t think that one run for public office by Rockey Vaccarella makes him an “activist.” That is, his words prove he is a sycophant, but not necessarily an activist. Let’s save our rhetorical ammo for when it can be most effective. Thanks.

  • Thankfully, in our system the legislative branch keeps a close eye on how the executive spends the people’s money. When Congress holds hearings on the horrible waste of Katrina relief, I’m sure we’ll get to the bottom of this.

    Oh, wait …

  • Ed,

    Actually, Halliburton has had no-bid N’awilins contracts since 2005.

    Bastards. All of ’em.

    I lived in New Orleans for seven years prior to Katrina, and was lucky enough to leave for school just before the storm. It was a lovely but troubled town that has been ravaged not by a storm, but by stupidity. No one who has been there could question why we must rebuild her.

  • You know Drew, I’ve got to go with Samwise on this one. Why are we always building communities for the poor in flood planes? The original New Orleans was built by the French on the tops of bluffs overlooking the river. It took American ingenuity to built homes on land below the sea level.

    Me, now I live near the top of a hill and rather doubt even the melting of Antarctica is going to flood me out 😉

    And New Orleans would be a lot better off in the future if they’d focus on rebuilding the Mississippi delta to give them some storm surge protection. But that would not seem to occur to the Army Corps of Engineers.

  • Lots of interesting comments. Here is something for people to ponder and think about. Anything man can build Mother Nature can flatten. Man’s arrogance to think other wise is just plain asinine
    Drew P, yeah someone in the midwest may get walloped by a tornado, key word there is may, and they don’t damage near as many homes or affect near as many people. One of the worst outbreaks were those on April 27th and 28th in 2002, 14 states affected, 224 million dollars in damage, 7 dead, 256 injured. I’ld rather take my chances with them even though there is little warning when they come . On the other hand New Orleans had days of warnings that it was coming, but your mayor didnt order an evacuation until 16 hours before it hit land. I also noticed he wasn’t in New Orleans when it hit.
    People who build atop a fault line are stupid.
    Anyone who lives in a coastal area will get hit by a hurricane, more than once. In the last 139 years New Orleans has been affected by a hurricane 36 times for an average of once every 3.75 years, and gets a direct hit every 12.27 years.
    Lance, The only way to rebuild the delta is to get rid of what caused its loss, the damn levees, canals and dykes that keep the Mississippi from flooding and depositing the soil that created the deltas in the first place. Estimated time for it to reform if the levees were removed 50 years. 20 square miles of delta and wetlands are being lost every year.
    Oh and before you jump, I live on the West Coast of Florida, smart enough to make sure my home is on high enough ground I dont have to worry about flooding unless there is a 45 foot storm surge, in which case most of the entire state will be under water.
    So what’s the answer, lets rebuild that which is above flood level. To rebuild that which is below sea level is criminal, because it will flood again and people will die because of it.

  • Lance, you are absolutely right in that the fundamental component of protecting New Orleans is to replenish/renew/rebuild the wetlands and barrier islands to reduce storm surge and wind before it gets as far inland as New Orleans. Allowing Louisiana to retain the same amount of oil royalties as other oil-producing states will provide needed revenue to begin accomplishing that goal.

    Dragons fire, in lieu of a detailed rebuttal, I’ll direct you to Boyd Blundell’s rebuttal to similar arguments here: http://afterthelevees.tpmcafe.com/blog/afterthelevees/2006/aug/29/we_are_not_ok.

    Thanks all.

  • Comments are closed.