It could have been bipartisan

At last Friday’s White House press briefing, a reporter asked Tony Snow about who will be with the president when he visited New York to honor the 5th anniversary of 9/11. Snow responded, “Staff, wife.” The reporter followed up by asking, “Was any thought ever given to a bipartisan delegation being with him?” Snow said he didn’t know for sure, but told the press corps, “Get back to us. We’ll talk about it.”

Assuming Snow was being sincere, the Bush gang did talk about it and apparently decided against a bipartisan delegation.

Both the Times and the Post note this morning that Bush laid two wreaths at ground zero last night in the company of George Pataki, Mike Bloomberg, and Rudy Giuliani. The Post goes well out of its way to remark that the event “left aside the partisan rancor” that…well, that Bush & Co. have enforced on the country since about 9-14.

If this event was so nonpartisan, where were Chuck Schumer and Hillary Clinton? Neither paper makes any mention of their having been there. I’m told that in fact they were not invited (they were at St. Paul’s church, where Bush went after laying the wreaths — and where there were apparently no photographers!!). In what sense does an event that features four Republicans but excludes the two senators who were representing New York at the time of the event, but who happen to be Democrats, leave aside partisan rancor?

I would add that New York is not only represented by two Democratic senators, but Ground Zero is represented by a Democratic House member (Jerold Nadler). Apparently, none of them was invited to participate.

Indeed, making a ceremony like this one bi-partisan could have been incredibly easy. The White House chose a different path.

To all of our detriment, it’s the same path Bush has chosen for the last five years.

In spite of their propagandistic motives, more bad news for the Bushies:

Poll: More Americans blame Bush for 9/11

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS…ries&eref=yahoo

  • The world, to the Bush Crime Family, is a political event first … and nothing else after that. With us or against us, salvation or damnation, good or evil.

  • I’m surprised even Republicans were willing to appear with him. And that might have been on the condition that he keep his stupid mouth shut. Sounds like Bush might finally be accepting the advice of if people think you might be stupid don’t open your mouth and remove all doubt.

  • Partisan is what Democrats do, non-partisan is what the boy king calls for when he wants his way. So, today really is a non-partisan event. Bush got things his way and there were no Democrats. (I think I’m getting the hang of how this works and I’m scaring myself.)

  • pol@3

    This is odd: http://tinyurl.com/qvu4c

    Anyone care to guess what, or who, they’re lauging about?

    I would have expected them to go down with him and help lay the wreaths or lay a wreath of their own. Unless they were afraid Rudy would leap on Bush and try to drown him in the fountain.

    “And, look! The prez is descrating the flag.”

    Wiping his feet on the flag is a lot better than what he wipes on the Bill of Rights.

  • Thanks for the great line “assuming Tony Snow was sincere”. I”ve been having a good chuckle about that one all day.

  • Since when did it become kosher, in honor of the fallen of September 11th, to have a separate Republican wreath laying ceremony and a separate Democratic wreath laying ceremony?

  • To President George W. Bush, it was merely a tremendous opportunity to have a great photo-op–something that he excels in. Trouble is, that is the only thing he excels in or cares about. He believes in partisanship not bipartisanship, which is to the detriment of the safety of our country and its citizens.

    Let’s hope that our fellow Americans will join us in replacing the callous Republicans now in power with caring, responsive, and responsible Democrats in the coming ’06 and ’08 elections. May true democracy be restored to our shores!

  • Comments are closed.