The most important meeting we never heard of

Last week, the New York Daily News highlighted what appeared to be one of the most important revelations in [tag]Bob Woodward[/tag]’s new book, “[tag]State of Denial[/tag].” As the paper noted, on July 10, 2001, almost exactly two months before 9/11, CIA Director George Tenet and his counterterrorism head Cofer Black sought an urgent meeting with then-National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice. They reportedly sought authorization to kill Osama bin Laden, but were discouraged when Rice gave them the brush-off.

As it happens, the meeting was even more important than that.

On July 10, 2001, two months before the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, then-CIA Director George J. Tenet met with his counterterrorism chief, J. Cofer Black, at CIA headquarters to review the latest on Osama bin Laden and his al-Qaeda terrorist organization. Black laid out the case, consisting of communications intercepts and other top-secret intelligence showing the increasing likelihood that al-Qaeda would soon attack the United States. It was a mass of fragments and dots that nonetheless made a compelling case, so compelling to Tenet that he decided he and Black should go to the White House immediately.

“Tenet called Condoleezza Rice, then national security adviser, from the car and said he needed to see her right away…. He and Black hoped to convey the depth of their anxiety and get Rice to kick-start the government into immediate action…. First, al-Qaeda was going to attack American interests, possibly in the United States itself. Black emphasized that this amounted to a strategic warning, meaning the problem was so serious that it required an overall plan and strategy. Second, this was a major foreign policy problem that needed to be addressed immediately. They needed to take action that moment — covert, military, whatever — to thwart bin Laden.

Black recalls, “The only thing we didn’t do was pull the trigger to the gun we were holding to her head.” Rice disagreed, and said Bush saw no need to “swat at flies.” A month later, Bush received a PDB alerting him to the fact that bin Laden was determined to strike inside the United States, which was treated with the same level of interest (which is to say, none).

The meeting, which has not been reported before, is incredibly important for two reasons.

First, for several years, all we’ve heard is that the intelligence community failed to “connect the dots” before 9/11. This meeting suggests the opposite; officials did connect the dots, in time, and brought their conclusions to the White House. Rice, tragically, failed to recognize the seriousness of the threat. We have all paid a dear price for the mistake.

Second, Rice and other administration officials neglected to mention anything about this meeting the 9/11 Commission.

Members of the Sept. 11 commission said Sunday they were alarmed that they were told nothing about a July 2001 White House meeting at which George J. Tenet, then director of central intelligence, is reported to have warned Condoleezza Rice, then national security adviser, about an imminent attack by Al Qaeda and failed to persuade her to take action.

“None of this was shared with us in hours of private interviews, including interviews under oath, nor do we have any paper on this,” said Timothy J. Roemer, a Democratic member of the commission and a former congressman from Indiana. “I’m deeply disturbed by this. I’m furious.”

Another Democratic commissioner, the former Watergate prosecutor Richard Ben-Veniste, said the staff of the Sept. 11 commission was polled in recent days on the disclosures in Mr. Woodward’s book and agreed that the meeting “was never mentioned to us.”

This isn’t just another example of the Bush gang choosing secrecy over disclosure. Peter Rundlet, counsel to the 9/11 Commission, explained, “At a minimum, the withholding of information about this meeting is an outrage. Very possibly, someone committed a crime. And worst of all, they failed to stop the plot.” (emphasis added)

Greg Mitchell, editor of E&P, suggested today that if Rice is wrong, and she intentionally kept this meeting secret from the 9/11 Commission, she may have to resign.

I’ll be sitting here, holding my breath, waiting for that resignation. Make sure to update this post when that happens.

Until then, someone check those phone records. Ought to be a nice juicy call to Rice’s office from Tenet and Black.

  • I just realized the timing of this announcement. People are wondering why we haven’t heard of this before. I know why – it’s because Rove was waiting until Woodward’s book was published, with its mention of the 9/11 meeting that disappeared from everyone’s memory. Now there’s something tittilating out there to talk about – what do you think the MSM wants to report on more – Foley’s gay escapades with underage teens, or a boring national security story that the Bush admin is just going to brush off as “partisan politics?”

  • Mysteriously, those phone records were lost in a technological mixup. Or, they are top secret. Or, the call never happened. Or, I have no recollection of being the person who picked up the phone, since others handle that task for me.

    Take your pick.

    It’s funny how she said it’s “incomprehensible” that she could have ignored such terrorist threats. And you know, that is true. It IS incomprehensible. However, that does NOT make it false.

  • What’s amazing is how Condi disputes nearly every single fact that was reported about her in Woodward’s book. And to the extent that she does not, she uses the now famous defense of “no recollection”. Obviously she wants this to turn into a “he says she says” case, that she thinks she can win on her credibility factor. Well, hate to break it to you Miss Rice – that was the OLD you. The current one doesn’t have a credible leg to stand on. I see why she gets along with Bush so well. They are both incredibly reliant on denial as their defense mechanism.

  • In all the brouhaha over Clinton vs Bush and focus on combatting terrorism, one thing seems to have been forgotten. If I recall correctly, Rice was scheduled to give a speech on Sept. 11, 2001 (obviously canceled) on what the administrations foreign/defense policy would be. The speech was essentially focused on missle-defense, with nary a word concerning terrorism, Al Qaeda (Bush: “Didn’t Al play for my Texas Rangers?”), or bin Laden. Anyone else recall this? Or am I forgetting things?

  • Ok – I got a question. Both Tenet and Black testified before the 9/11 Commission. I can’t beleive that no one asked them if they ever tried to meet with Administration officials re bin Laden prior to 9/11. So why did they not say anything themselves to the Commission? Something about the fact that this meeting wasn’t reported to the Commission doesn’t smell quite right.

  • Let’s ask Tenent and Black. Where are they? Can the Commission call them back? Let’s ask them to reply to this allegation by Woodward under oath. It’s time for some TRUTH!!!!!!

  • Someone in the Bush administration committed a crime by lying about what happened before and on 9-11?

    Color me surprised.

    Isn’t this the second instance that someone affiliated with the Bush administration mislead (or failed to divulge) the 9-11 Commission? I seem to remember officers with NORAD lying about their readiness and reaction to 9-11.

    It’d be nice if someone came up with a cohesive narrative that indicts the Bush administration for missing all the warning signs of 9-11 then lying to cover up their mistakes. Maybe that same someone could suggest the Bush Administration be held accountable.

  • Rice today:

    “What I am quite certain of is that I would remember if I was told, as this account apparently says, that there was about to be an attack in the United States, and the idea that I would somehow have ignored that I find incomprehensible,” Rice said.

    “I don’t know that this meeting took place, but what I really don’t know, what I’m quite certain of, is that it was not a meeting in which I was told there was an impending attack and I refused to respond,” Rice said.

    Well, I’m convinced. How ’bout you?

    Fucking pathetic.

  • Whether her memory failure was intentional or unintentional, Condiliar should be forced to resign. Her unabated failures of judgment, on nearly everything she touches (sort of like anyone inthis administration) have caused this nation significant loss and harm.

  • Why would she have to resign in this administration? In this administration, that’s grounds for a promotion. Most likely she was following the boss’s orders – let bin Laden slaughter some Americans, then the administration can begin the “war on terror” and grab more and more power.

  • If the Dems can take back congress, I predict Bush will go down in a hail of congressional hearings. Nixon had “I am not a crook” and Clinton had “I did not have sexual relations with that woman”. What will Bush’s memorable scandalous quote be?

  • If this does not rise to the level of “Criminal Negligence”, then surely the very concept no longer applies. “Criminal Negligence” is the most charitable construction that can be put on the actions of this administration in its first eight months in office.

  • As George Bush might say, “Denial is not just a river in South America.”

    I wonder if Kissinger kneels and prays with Bush in the Oval Office like he did with Nixon.

    If Bush cowers in the Nixonian fetal position can we abort him?

    Just some randow snark.

  • Maybe S.o.D and the Foley scandal will allow a few more die hard GOP fans to “Connect the Dots,” re: The culture of lies fermenting in the White House & Senate.

    p.s. Can we start calling the members of the GOP G[r]OPers?

  • What will Bush’s memorable scandalous quote be?

    Comment by PAL —

    🙂 Now there’s a snak generator of a question!

    How about, “I was drain bamaged by alcohol.”

    or

    “I did not torture those men…those men who drag their chains through the White House halls at night.”

  • What will Bush’s memorable scandalous quote be?

    Comment by PAL —

    🙂 Now there’s a snark generator of a question!

    How about, “I was drain bamaged by alcohol.”

    or

    “I did not torture those men…those men who drag their chains through the White House halls at night.”

    PS Am I the only to have been called “cowboy” by The CarpetBagger Report?

  • “What will Bush’s memorable scandalous quote be? ”

    “I’m the decider” or “Duh”

    A time for a bad parody:

    I remember all my life
    my blood as cold as ice.
    Shadows of a tall man,
    a face through a Predator camera in the night,
    the night goes into

    Morning just another day;
    unconcerned people pass my way.
    Looking in their dull eyes,
    I see a memory I never realized
    how angry you made me.

    Oh Condi well,
    you came and you lied without faking,
    with my memo unopened.
    Oh, Condi well,
    you kissed me off to stop me from blabbing,
    and I screwed you today. Oh, Condi!

    I’m standing on the edge of chasm;
    I walked away when you had a spasm
    Caught up in a fantasy of Star Wars fighting,
    the fears are on my mind
    and nothin’ is rhyming.

    Oh Condi well,
    you came and you lied without faking,
    with my memo unopened.
    Oh, Condi well,
    you kissed me off to stop me from blabbing,
    and I screwed you today. Oh, Condi!

    Yesterday’s hell, I face the morning
    pissing in the breeze, the pain is callin’

    Oh Condi well,
    you can spin and lie without faking,
    with my memo unopened.
    Oh, Condi well,
    you tried your best to stop me from blabbing,
    and I got you today. Oh, Condi!

  • I wonder why Tenet or Black didn’t tell the 9-11 commission.

    Something doesn’t seem to add up to me and I wouldn’t be surprised if Woodward were wrong and this is all going to make Bush look good in the end.

    In any event, can anyone explain why none of the three people at this ‘meeting’ never bothered to tell the 9-11 commission?

  • “Tenet called Condoleezza Rice, then national security adviser, from the car and said he needed to see her right away…. He and Black hoped to convey the depth of their anxiety and get Rice to kick-start the government into immediate action…. First, al-Qaeda was going to attack American interests, possibly in the United States itself. Black emphasized that this amounted to a strategic warning, meaning the problem was so serious that it required an overall plan and strategy.” – Bob Woodward, “State of Denial”

    I’m not surprised that Tenet and Black thought they could do this. After all, this kind of Government response is just what protected America from the Millenium attacks…

    … during the Clinton/Gore administration.

    Unfortunately for America, Tenet and Black did not realize six months into it that the Bush/Cheney administration thought dealing with terrorism was “swat[ing] at flies”.

    And the Bushites have the nerve to suggest that it was Clinton that left America unguarded.

  • I don’t know if this meeting did/did not occur, but I will say Condi got a major pass from the 9/11 commission.

    I have always felt she was waaaaay underqualified to be NSA and Secretary of State. First, her background was the Soviet Union. Someone please tell me how that plays into the 21st century as a major issue? Of course, even by the 2000 election is was as obvious as a boil on the nose that terrorism was one of the top international issues. Second, she did not have enough … umph for lack of a better word, to go up against Cheney, Addington, Rummy, et al. Her bureaucratic infighting skills seem to have been non-existant. Third, she was operating at a disadvantage – Bush didn’t think terrorism was all that important – though Iraq was. No matter how close she and Bush she was going to come up short and here behaviour since the newest Woodward book jumped onto the scene, is an effort to keep her relatively unscathed reputation intact.

  • It was a mass of fragments and dots that nonetheless made a compelling case, so compelling to Tenet that he decided he and Black should go to the White House immediately.
    In the lead up to 9/11 the US intelligence community was able to connect the dots. Those dots within the limits of the existing laws and treaties such as FISA and the Geneva Convention. BushCo. failed to pay attention to warnings given by the intelligence community because they were fixed on pushing through a leftover Reagan agenda item: missile defense. Then the unthinkable happened on 9/11.

    What did they tell us the problem was. It was the system. The president needed new tools-as if he wasn’t a big enough tool himself. So Congress gave him the Patriot Act. That wasn’t enough for him he decided to scrape FISA on his own, pullout the thumbscrews, and lock up US citizens as enemy combatants.

    We have given up some of civil liberties voluntarily and had some of them taken away from us, because BushCo wanted to shift the blame from themselves to the system. It should not be any surprise that they would like to keep the blame from where it rightfully belongs.

    Lying is about the only thing they have been competent at.

  • Re #20: I’d like to know the answer to that too. Hopefully this story gains enough traction with reporters capable of quizzing Tenet or Black about it.

  • Lance – clearly you don’t listen to enough “Lite Rock, Less Talk” radio stations if you didn’t see that was a Mandy parody! What do you do with yourself, trying to solve the world’s problems???

  • “Lance – clearly you don’t listen to enough “Lite Rock, Less Talk” radio stations if you didn’t see that was a Mandy parody! What do you do with yourself, trying to solve the world’s problems???” – Homer

    Just trying to do my part to defend and protect the U.S. Constitution and the people of the United States.

    And I am certainly not going to apologize for not recognizing Barry Manilow, though I think I caught the chorus once I hit “Oh Condi well, you came and you lied without faking”.

  • As I recall, Richard Clarke testified that Tenet was “running around like his hair was on fire,” nearly panicked over a potential al queda attack. If that’s the case, and I have no reason to doubt Clarke, it seems reasonable that Tenet would have pressed Rice for action.

    It shouldn’t be difficult to establish if the National Security Advisor and the Director of Central Intelligence had a meeting on July 10, 2001. I expect their whereabouts are monitored, say, every minute of the day.

    What they spoke about, we’ll never know. They would claim no memory of the conversation. End of story.

  • What will Bush’s memorable scandalous quote be?

    “Air Assualt”

    okay, on a less snarky note, how about:

    “Okay, you’ve covered your a*@ now”

    or

    “I could care less about Osama Bin Laden”

  • In regards to if the “meeting” took place.

    Dan Bartlett, Counselor to the President on ABC This Week on Sunday morning, “Well, I must say, myself and other members including Secretary Rice, who, aahh, alleges was in this meeting, there was a meeting.” When Stephanopolus(?) first brought up the “meeting” in Woodward’s book. Stephanopolus(?) went into another question at that time. The 9/11 Commission was never told about this meeting and now is a good time to find out why. It might actually work out better to save that investigation until after the new Congress starts in January. Bartlett had very animated expressions as he talked. When he said “there was a meeting”, he looked down, lowered his voice slightly from his normal tone and furrowed his brow. Not the kind of person I would trust to be truthful because he seemed well practiced at telling lies. He also tended to grin at inappropriate times in the conversation like somebody else we know, but he did acknowledge that the meeting took place.

  • We have a “commode”-er in chief who passed off an imminent-threat advisory about 9/11, and thinks that Iraq is a comma; why shouldn’t we have a presidential minion who passes “al-kay-duh” is fodder for a fly-swatter? These people make the “outbound” contents of a toilet look good….

  • The CBS Evening News had not one word about this today. This should be HUGE news. Hmmm…..

  • Comments are closed.