A few days ago, Claire McCaskill unveiled a powerful, emotional ad in her Senate race in Missouri against Sen. Jim Talent (R). It’s a straightforward piece featuring Michael J. Fox, clearly feeling the effects of Parkinson’s disease, highlighting Talent’s opposition to stem-cell research. It’s a little painful to watch, but it’s a stark reminder of how difficult it is to understand why Talent and other far-right Republicans would rather see excess embryos discarded than see potentially life-saving medical research conducted.
With the Missouri race too-close-to-call, a control of the Senate in the balance, the right can’t let the Michael J. Fox ad go without a response. But how does one defend an indefensible policy? How far-right does one have to be to go after someone with Parkinson’s who simply he wants his government to take its foot off the brake?
Apparently, now we know. Here’s Rush Limbaugh today.
“I must share this; I have gotten a plethora of emails from people saying Michael J. Fox has admitted in interviews that he goes off his medication for Parkinson’s disease when he appears before Congress or other groups as a means of illustrating the ravages of the disease.
“Lest there be any misunderstanding, we talked about a half-hour ago of the commercial that’s running for Claire McCaskill featuring Michael J. Fox and what now appears to be when he’s off his meds, and I’d never seen him this way. And I stated when I saw the ad, I was commenting to you about it, that he’s either off his medication or he’s acting. He is an actor after all…. I think this is exploitative in a way that’s unbecoming of either Claire McCaskill or Michael J. Fox.”
Now, I don’t know whether Fox forgoes medication in certain circumstances or not, but I think Limbaugh is wildly off-base suggesting Fox could have been faking it for the ad, and even more wrong suggesting the ad is “exploitative.”
You can see the ad and judge for yourself, but I think John Cole’s analysis is spot-on.
…I find no problems with the commercial you just watched — there are no false promises, there are no lies, there are no distortions. Michael J. Fox isn’t saying that a vote for the Democrats is a vote for a cure, he is stating that a vote for the Democrats is a vote for research in the area, and given the GOP’s fealty to the religious right and hatred of science, I don’t see how that can be argued.
Voting for the GOP is a vote for the status quo. Voting for the GOP is a vote to keep the same stem-cell stance. Voting for the GOP is to voting to limit the hope of stem cell research breakthroughs (which not assured, are far more likely if the research is conducted than if it is not)…. Is it a powerful ad? Yes, but part of the reason it is powerful is because it is true.
Exactly. There’s nothing exploitative about Michael J. Fox asking voters to back the candidate who offers hope, and voting against the candidate who doesn’t.
As for “he is an actor after all,” Limbaugh’s smack at Fox is heartless and callous. We’re talking about someone suffering with Parkinson’s disease, for goodness sakes. To even suggest that it’s all just an act is just pathetic.
And as long as we’re on the subject, Limbaugh subtly criticizing someone for going off their meds … nah, forget it, it’s too easy.