Who’s airing an enemy propaganda film — CNN or the RNC?

One of the biggest topics among conservative bloggers the past several days is a video, broadcast last week by CNN, that shows insurgent snipers in Iraq shooting at U.S. troops. The right is nearly apoplectic about this, and this week, they’re getting support from Republican members of Congress. The anger seems misplaced, and in an odd twist, possibly hypocritical.

The video is, to be sure, rather painful. The footage does not literally show any Americans getting shot or killed, but it does shows a service member standing in a public area. The viewer hears a shot fired, and then the video fades to black before any graphic images are seen.

In response, Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.), chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, said that airing the video was irresponsible, it could encourage more attacks on U.S. troops, and has asked the Pentagon to prohibit CNN reporters from traveling with U.S. military units in Iraq.

“Does CNN want America to win this thing?” Hunter asked yesterday on the network. In past wars, he said, the media was more pro-American. “You can’t be on both sides of the war.” […]

In a letter released yesterday, Hunter and two other Republican House members from California asked Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld to remove CNN from the military embedding program, in which journalists spend time with combat units in Iraq.

“CNN has now served as the publicist for an enemy propaganda film,” wrote Hunter and Reps. Brian Bilbray and Darrell Issa.

It’s interesting Hunter, Bilbray, and Issa would put it this way.

I’m not at all sure terrorists would consider this footage useful for propaganda purposes, but a reasonable case can be made — indeed, has been made — that the latest commercial from the Republican National Committee is far closer to an “enemy propaganda film” than anything we’ve seen on CNN.

This is not just a video which suggests that Republicans will be better at fighting terror. It actually very closely resembles real al-Qaeda videos…. This video would not look out of place on a jihadi forum, and it wouldn’t surprise me if it actually gets posted on them and admired (although the production values are a bit low for an actual al-Sahab product).

Anyone involved in analyzing or combating al-Qaeda’s media strategies has to be astounded that the Republican National Committee has financed, produced, distributed on the internet, and aired on US television what is for all intents and purposes an al-Qaeda recruitment video. The video, if it works as intended, will frighten the American people and influence American politics… just like al-Qaeda’s own videos. Bin Laden couldn’t be prouder, or more grateful, especially since it didn’t cost him a thing.

CNN aired a video showing part of a sniper attack, but intentionally didn’t show anything graphic or violent. The Republican National Committee, meanwhile, paid considerably to broadcast, on national television, video highlighting terrorists’ rhetoric and training footage.

Does the Republican National Committee “want America to win this thing?” Has the RNC “now served as the publicist for an enemy propaganda film”?

If CNN’s far-right critics are equally outraged by the RNC’s commercial, I might find their criticism a little more compelling. Until then….

As many of us noted back when the ad became public, the GOP has become terrorists themselves. It is great to see Olberman picking up on that theme. It really is THE story behind this ad–GOP resorting to terrorist tactics just to win some votes, all the while specifically pushing the terrorist’ propoganda. Incredible.

The strangest part of Olberman’s comment came afterwards–Scarborough the Clown did a piece on the CNN footage and neglected to touch upon the RNC ad and the obvious comparisons.

  • It seems that the RNC sees propaganda as the only use for war/terrosist/bombing footage, i.e. it should not be used to inform the public but to intimidate the public.

  • By the same Repub logic, any footge from 9/11 is terrorist propaganda because it shows the terrorists finest hour in their attacks on the U.S. Neither the sniper footage, nor EID footge easily seen on Youtube, nor any war images depicting U.S. troops under attack or the fatalities or wounded are beneficial to terrorists. On the contrary, they make me, and I’m sure many other Americans, mad.

    The RNC ad, however, as well as others like it, continue to drive fear into the hearts of Americans using bin Laden’s , al Zawahiri’s and other al Quaeda operatives own words on what horror they would wish to bring to us. That’s useful propaganda. But then the Republicans find it as useful to have a terrorized US. populace as al Quaeda does.

    Bin Laden couldn’t have hoped for a better PR firm than the Republican Party. They have made him a legend far beyond the notoriety due him, they have repeated his words as if they are sacred text and have made him the most feared person in the world, just as bin Laden himself could ever have hoped for in his wildest dreams. By activey not pursuing bn Laden Bush allows the Arab’s legend to continue to grow.

  • From the party that complained about photos of flag draped coffins, we give you…More Assery!

    Is it me or do these guys act like a soldier who dies is something to be ashamed of? Not in a: Oh Gods, I feel awful I played any part in this man’s death, sort of way. More a: You dumb grunt, stop making us look bad! way

    As I posted in another blog, they’ll be ordering Arlington Cemetery to conduct services in the dead of night lest the sight of a soldier being buried cheer up any lurking terrorists. Fuckwits.

    But if they want to send a Fox News team instead… Put them waaaay out front. Those guys may be crap as reporters but I bet they’d make swell bullet catchers.

  • Yeah, um, footage of a sniper taking aim at a US soldier is NEWS! CNN is still “mostly” a news service. Like it or not, people die in war, it is kind of the general idea of war.

    Why does the GOP want to hide the sacrafice of our soldiers from the people who sent them to Iraq? How does sticking the Iraq war in the closet help us win?

    These guyus suck.

  • It is sickening that the survival of Republican majorities depends upon having a worthy opponent — real or manufactured.

  • How are sniper videos any different than the montage of roadside bombs featured in Frontline’s “Lost Year in Iraq” last week? Most of the videos appeared to have been shot by bad guys. Surely that should have drawn as much criticism — but for the fact that those videos have been around for a while.

    What about video of the mutilated bodies hanging from the bridge in Fallujah? Is that enemy propaganda, too?

  • Post script:
    Apparently, the spin on the Mike Savage show was that Anderson Cooper is a traitor for watching Americans get sniped without warning them. But that’s only because Mike Savage is an idiot, and so are his listeners for believing him.

  • The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake. … We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means, it is an end. … How does one man assert his power over another? … By making him suffer. Obedience is not enough. Unless he is suffering, how can you be sure that he is obeying your will and not his own? Power is inflicting pain and humiliation. … A world of fear and treachery and torment, a world of trampling and being trampled upon, a world which will grow not less but more merciless as it refines itself. …

    If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face—forever.
    1984

    Orwell was a freakin’ psychic …

  • I am sure CB will link to Keith O in his final wrap-up today…..but Keith spoke of the CNN “outrage” in his special commentary last night. Keith had another excellent, excellent commentary…..he alone can get the masses fired up.

  • Thank God for Olberman. He is making public the private thoughts of most of us. He is exibiting what we the people have been so gravely lacking these last six years: leadership.

  • Well, everyone in Bushworld knows that when you create reality, anything not seen just isn’t really happening. So, if we don’t see body bags, maimed victims of this war or sniper fire, then it isn’t happening and we’re winning the war. All we need to see is the Moron in Chief telling us that “freedom is on the march” to make it true.

  • Just to add: The threat is real (cue RNC commercial) but the realities of this misbegotten war aren’t…or the terrorists win. Welcome to Dubya in Wonderland.

  • #1 Bubba:

    Watching Olbermann’s special comment leading in to Scarborough is always hilarious. Scabby had to run the CNN piece and the Repubs’ criticism, which had just been roundly exposed for its two-facedness by Keith just 2 minutes prior…

    Also, I love to watch Scabby’s face when his show starts, almost like: “OK, how am I gonna follow that?”

  • i thought the most telling line was, spoken about a news outlet, “you can’t be on both sides of a war.”

    to translate: “journalism shouldn’t be fair and objective.”

    which about sums up the Rethug worldview, and the creation of Faux News.

    really, Colbert has to have the easiest job on earth. these twits believe facts should have a well-known bias, they just wish it were towerds them.

  • San Diego: most beautiful urban area in California, physically, dumbest part of the state after Orangutang County politically – proof of what happens when you let too many lifer morons congregate on one spot.

  • Doesn’t anyone remember that way back when the invasion first took place that all news media were ordered not to show any Iraqi combatants at all but only U.S. soldiers in newscasts? That always struck me as odd, just like the ban on showing flag drapped coffins.

    And apparently the meme is so deeply embedded in the minds of the wingnuts that it’s reached the stage of raw psychosis. It’s not the media that encourages attacks on our troops, it’s the fact that they are there to get shot at.

    It’s just idiots like Hunter who have drunk so deep of the kool aid that they’ve virtually fallen into the vat that still don’t get it.

  • The Terrorists couldn’t have even dreamt of anything as good as the CNN propanganda piece. I really wonder if they don’t slip CNN a few bucks! It would also be interesting to see if there are any “foreign” deposits of huge cash into the Man Tan Man’s (Edward R Oldermann) bank account.

    Hey guys, remember when you libs used UBL in commercials????

  • Hey Paul – you obviously didn’t read the second half of the post above…

    but at least CNN is only re-playing terrorist videos… The RNC ad proves Republicans are terrorizing Americans themselves… why do you hate America so much?

  • San Diego: most beautiful urban area in California, physically, dumbest part of the state after Orangutang County politically – proof of what happens when you let too many lifer morons congregate on one spot.

    Comment by Tom Cleaver — 10/24/2006 @ 1:35 pm

    after 4 years in Vietnam I was so demoralized by the lifers around me …that I thought I was going insane… the vast majority of these people are just plain stupid ,not ignorant but ,STUPID…

    the people who stay could not possibly make it in the civilian world…

    PSST!!!!!!….
    what happened last week at the Falcon base in Bahgdad?

    300 dead Americans ,yet its not on the news…does anyone think this government is not a dictatorship??

  • CNN broadcast a frightening truth, it seems to me. THE TERRORISTS IN IRAQ HAVE WON.

    But they did not beat America. Nor did they beat the American military. They beat the Bush administration–and Donny Rumsfeld in particular. Of course, given the administration’s blinding arrogance and incompetence, that is not a big surprise.

  • “Does CNN want America to win this thing?” Hunter asked yesterday on the network.

    “this thing”? THING???

    “War”. “Invasion”. “Horror” “Disaster”. Any one or all 4. But not a “thing”, Mr Hunter.

    Asshole.

  • As an aspiring journalist, I noticed and thought the same as Zeitgeist (comment #15):

    i thought the most telling line was, spoken about a news outlet, “you can’t be on both sides of a war.”
    to translate: “journalism shouldn’t be fair and objective.”

    Personally, I would prefer to see the clip myself to see what the big fuss is rather than have someone describe it to me. However; it doesn’t sound to me like CNN did any wrongdoing by airing it. Journalism should be fair and should present all sides possible – if it doesn’t, it’s biased.

    Even if they seriously think it’s wrong, sue CNN or something – don’t bar them from reporting about the war. That’s against the freedom of press!

  • Comments are closed.