When critics of the Bush White House talk about the president having undermined our national prestige and moral authority, this is exactly what we’re talking about.
Several governments around the world have tried to rebut criticism of how they handle detainees by claiming they are only following the U.S. example in fighting terrorism, the U.N. special rapporteur on torture said Monday.
Manfred Nowak said that when he criticizes governments for their questionable treatment of detainees, they respond by telling him that if the United States does something, it must be all right. He would not name any countries except Jordan.
“The United States has been the pioneer . . . of human rights and is a country that has a high reputation in the world,” Nowak said at a news conference. “Today, many other governments are kind of saying: ‘But why are you criticizing us? We are not doing something different than what the United States is doing.’ “
Up until fairly recently — say, before Bush took office — the United States held itself out as a global leader, if not the leader, on human rights. We would sometimes falter, but we set high standards for ourselves. We strived to meet those standards, and encouraged others to follow our lead.
And now, well, we have the Bush administration.
Nowak said that because of its prominence, the United States has a greater responsibility to uphold international standards for its prisoners.
State Department spokesman Kurtis Cooper said Monday night that he had not seen Nowak’s comments and had no response.
Nowak has chastised the United States over detainee policy and for maintaining secret prisons.
Nowak did say that the U.S. had made some progress, particularly in Iraq after the Abu Ghraib scandal. That, of course, is encouraging, but it comes before broad new powers Congress has given the president in this area, including the suspension of habeas corpus, a broad ability to define “illegal enemy combatant,” a repudiation of the Geneva Conventions, the ability to use “coerced” and secret evidence, and presenting the administration with a tragically narrow definition of “torture.”
We are, of course, a “pioneer” no more. Other countries — those we used to be able to repudiate with a straight face — are using the U.S. to justify conduct we used to deplore.
In an entirely different context, Kevin Drum recent wrote:
I wonder how long it will take America to recover from George Bush’s uniquely blinkered and self-righteous brand of ineptitude? … So how long will it take — after George Bush has left office — for our power and influence on the world stage to return to the level it was at in 2001? When I’m in a good mood, I figure five years. Realistically, ten years is probably more like it. And when I’m in a bad mood? Don’t ask. It’s really all very depressing.
After considering how other countries are using our misconduct to justify their own, it’s even more depressing.