About those exit polls…

In 2004, exit-poll data leaked, as everyone assumed it would, and caused widespread consternation. This year, pollsters are really intent on keeping the early numbers under wraps.

Two-by-two, polling specialists from ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, Fox News and the Associated Press will go into rooms in New York and Washington shortly before noon Tuesday. Their cellphones and BlackBerrys will be confiscated; proctors will monitor the doors; and for the next five hours, these experts will pore over exit-poll data from across the country.

If all goes well, only when they emerge from their cloisters will the legions of ravenous political bloggers have any chance of getting their hands on the earliest indication of which party will end up controlling Congress.

“The demand for info is intense, and if the safeguards aren’t steel doors bolting people inside a room, it will get out,” says Marc Ambinder, associate editor of National Journal’s Hotline OnCall. “The insatiable appetite for this info will overwhelm the ability to keep it secret.”

Count on it. The WSJ said media executives figure the secret will keep less than half an hour. I’d frankly be a little surprised if it kept that long.

The Journal added, “Mainstream news organizations know that bloggers will eventually get their hands on the exit-poll data, but their goal is to delay it as long as possible because the accuracy of the data improves as the day goes on.” That’s only partially true — the data certainly becomes more reliable as the universe of those polled goes up, but that’s not quite the reason the numbers are carefully shielded.

TPM’s DK explains.

Let’s just remember, folks, that this is about protecting the value of their proprietary information, not some high-minded effort to prevent the misuse of the polling data. That’s fine. No one is expected to reveal his or her scoop in advance (in this instance, literally before it’s ready for primetime).

What remains ironic though is that it’s the major news organizations themselves that over-rely on the exit polls and have done so for years. The 2000 and 2004 debacles aside, the exit polls have long driven the networks’ election night coverage, providing them with the pretense of speaking authoritatively about the results before the results are known.

It is television that has turned election night into the political equivalent of the Super Bowl, where the Democrats and Republicans will battle it out for four hours or so and then a winner will be handed the trophy by a beaming TV announcer. For those four hours, they want us on the couch eating Doritos, not surfing the web for exit poll data.

You wonder though. If all the money the networks pour into exit polling went instead into political reporting, actual political reporting, wearing out the shoe leather about who’s doing what and where during the last hours of the campaigns and on election day, whether the result might be more informative for the electorate. Maybe, for instance, the networks would have caught on to the NRCC’s nationwide robocall scam first, instead of the blogs.

Hard work pounding the pavement? Shoe-leather reporting during an election? What sheer madness.

DK’s point about “proprietary information” is of particular significance today. These exit polls are a commercial product, sold to media outlets and news organizations for thousands of dollars. A week after the election, all of the data can be purchased by academics, political parties and others for $10,000.

To protect their product, the process will unfold with a strict process:

In previous years, numbers were made available to the news organizations in waves via secure Web sites. In 2004, the first wave of data went out around 2 p.m. and quickly leaked onto the Internet. That’s what brought about this year’s sequestering of the news organization’s representatives. The only communication they’ll be allowed to make out of the so-called quarantine rooms before 5 p.m. will be to warn their new organizations about potential problems in the data. (In 2000, faulty polling prompted some networks to incorrectly call Florida in favor of Al Gore.) Those messages will be monitored by representatives of the polling firm NEP has contracted with. […]

But at 5 p.m., waves of exit-poll data will begin flowing to newsrooms via limited-access Web sites. For the bloggers, the scramble will be on to get the data first, hoping for an email from a friendly source.

It’s only a matter of time.

I bet exit polls don’t have voter supression tactics built into their models – so they’re pretty much worthless anyway

  • Maybe the media could at least look at whether the types of things that went on during the last election are going on again, such as long lines in certain districts, misdirections to polling places, and “caging” operations designed to suppress the vote in certain areas.

    But that would be like… doing their jobs.

  • Cleveland Plain Dealer: “More than 40 polling places in Cuyahoga County reported problems with some or all of their electronic voting machines this morning and had to revert to paper ballots to allow residents to vote, the Board of Elections reported.”

    They quickly reverted to paper. So we’ll put it under the ‘good news’ column, I guess.

  • Why should anyone in the media be forced to lie to the public?

    Steve,if you know exit poll numbers and you don’t tell us then all of your posts are potential lies.

    For example, let’s say that you KNOW that the exit polls right now show Steele winning HUGE in Maryland. If that is the case then it really doesn’t matter (as far as the Democrats getting control of the Senate) what else happens in any other race because the Democrats would be lucky to pick up six seats and when they lost one then it would be 50-50.

    Now, I am not saying Cardin is going down in MD. Actually he is about a 68% favorite right now.

    I am saying that it is wrong to immediately publish polls all throughout the year as soon as you get them but to withhold information on one day a year. This is especially true if you write about an event where you know the results of an undisclosed poll.

    Go back two weeks, let’s say that you KNOW that a Gallup poll will be released in 4 hours that shows Ford with a 12% lead in TN. You don’t tell us about it but you write a post claiming that Ford has been doing really well recently and you expect him to be up in the polls very soon. What you wrote was correct but you would have LIED.

    You didn’t ‘expect’ him to be up in the polls. You KNEW he was up in the polls.

    So, today, EVERYONE who has access to exit polls has an obligation to disclose that they have seen the poll numbers and not to comment on the races where they have information they are not willing to share.

  • In a rational less hyper world we’d all just go about our business and check the newspapers tomorrow to see who won. Our constant speculation serves no real purpose. But ain’t it fun! 🙂

  • I’d like to see exit polling data during the day today to highlight any Diebolding that occurs that skews those results. Then maybe it might even make news when a Dem is showing a 13% win by exit polls, but the “results” show him a loser by 2%.

    No concession speeches tonight no matter what. Contest every loss.

  • Guys, please, exit polls are the BEST way to show if the vote count is honest — and have been so used in various Eastern European elections. (It’s a shame that our election might be as suspicious as those, but until we end the Reign of Diebold, they are.)

    As for sequestering the info, I agre with it. Exit polls shouldn’t come out till the polls are closed, to avoid certain classic types of manipulations. (“Tell me how many votes you need, and I’ll get them for you.” And the Sequoia yellow button glitch makes this easier today.)

  • The networks want exit polling so they can have meaningless scoops against each other, projecting victories a few minutes earlier in their broadcasts than their rivals. Political junkies want advance information, well, just because. None of this means anything; we’ll have the next two years to live with whatever results come out today, and knowing those results a few hours earlier this evening won’t mean squat.

    From where I sit, the only really significant interest we as voters would have in exit polling is if they are to be used to check for signs of potential vote fraud. However, we’ve been admonished over and over again that we aren’t allowed to use exit polling data that way, for some reason.

  • And, at the end of the WJS article:

    “I’ll post it with the caveat that it was all crap last time and will probably be crap again,” says Glenn Reynolds of Instapundit.com, a conservative-leaning blog, who will be doing interviews for CNN via a Webcam from his Knoxville, Tenn., home.

    resonating with BEWARE OF EXIT POLLS, in which the GOP warns that exit polls are always skewed in favor of Democrats. They are pretty het up about devaluing the exit poll, which of course would have nothing to do with its power to reveal election fraud, tampering and voter suppression in 2004.
    So, for the truth-and-fairness-obsessed GOP, the election is the test of the exit poll. How convenient. It used to be the other way round.

  • EXIT POLLS – THEY WANT TO KILL US.

    Mainstream news organizations know that bloggers will eventually get their hands on the exit-poll data

    BLOGGERS – THEY WANT TO KILL US.

    CB, I think you guys are making the hacks jealous. Keep up the good work.

  • I am sick. Exit polling may have actually had some effect again in Missouri and Montana showing that yes, the information predicted earlier did in fact come true so don’t waste a vote go with the majority. That is where the media was, is, and will be.

    Nancy P will be the re-introduction of the Peanut Butter era of Jimmy C. Pay off any loans you have out, get in a position of strength because there will be significant job losses very soon. The end of an era has come and there will be significant problems.

    Get a gun, quick – because soon you won’t be able to so when Al Queda gets here – and now they will come here to fight instead of Iraq – you won’t have the ability to defend yourself or your family. Better buy enough ammunition to last a few years too –

    I cannot believe we have allowed this many dumbasses vote. I can’t believe the Republicans couldn’t get their act together any better and get something done. I vote to limit your next opportunity to vote only to those who do not get something from the government with the possible exception of the military.

    Now we have to listen to this bunch of idiots like Stephanie Cutter who can’t shut the heck up. God Bless Us, we’re gona need it.

  • HAHAHAHAHA!
    That’s right, Georgia Mountaineer. Head For The Hills!!!
    You stupid prick.
    Has Bush got you scared of everything?
    Your not afraid of terrorists, are you?

    Boo! We’re going to raise the minimum wage for you!

    Now if you would only get a job.

    B.T.W. Who answered the skill test for you so you could post? Your manfriend or your boyfriend?

  • Comments are closed.